Talk:Antiquity (journal)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Acknowledging Antiquity’s role with the Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG) conference

Latest comment: 1 day ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I am aware that a sentence acknowledging the support Antiquity gives to the annual TAG conference has recently been deleted by another editor. I am starting this thread to open a dialogue on this. I personally think that the role the journal plays with TAG should be acknowledged in this article. Indeed, it might be worth acknowledging other conferences where Antiquity has a presence, such as the European Association of Archaeologists (EAA) conference. Admt999 (talk) 02:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I removed that phrase and just did so again. It says that the journal contributes "significantly" to TAG, but that is nowhere supported in the source given. You'll need an independent reliable source that says this. All I see from the link that you gave is that one year Antiquity "hosted" TAG, but it is not really clear what that means and whether it is "significant". --Randykitty (talk) 12:30, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I understand the need for independent and reliable sources. I hope the revised version of the sentence with new sources meets these criteria. Many thanks. Admt999 (talk) 17:47, 24 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic