Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Kingsley Wood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

tenure of the Chancellor of the Exchequer

[edit]

If Sir Kingsley died on 21 Sep, 1943, how could he step down 3 days later, on 24 Sep?--218.103.231.56 17:43, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably that's when Anderson was appointed as the new Chancellor. I've amended the dates. Timrollpickering 16:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements

[edit]

The following containing additional information that could be used to improve the article:

  • Quotation from Herbert Morrison, An Autobiography (1960)
  • Sir Kingsley Wood. A talk to The Eltham Society by John Kennett, Thursday 6th December 2007
  • Barnett, Correlli, The Audit of War, pub Macmillan, 1986, and Papermac, 1987, ISBN 0-333-434587.

Of these (1) and (2) bring out Wood's achievement introducing PAYE for income tax (which we still have), and Post War Credits [Morrison disapproved of that because it tied that hands of the post-war Labour Government].

(1) Also brings out Wood's achievement glamorising the Post Office when he was postmaster general

In (3) Kingsley Wood emerges as the one great hero who opposed the 'new Jerusalem' ideas of Beveridge. [Barnett seems to have regarded the implementation of Beveridge's ideas as a national disaster for Britain.] --Toddy1 (talk) 05:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

False attribution

[edit]

The tale of Kingsley Wood telling Leo Amery that the Black Forest could not be bombed is a neat one, but not borne out by the relevant Hansard, which is here. I imagine it is a tale that has got mixed up with this from Claude Lowther in the First World War.

On a more general point this piece is rather thin for Churchill's war Chancellor. If I get the time I shall peruse through "The Chancellors" by Roy Jenkins and try to add some more relevant points. 79.73.124.57 (talk) 10:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The first search in Hansard returns nothing relevant. Also the External Links in the article to the biography requires a subscription to log in. Salsa man (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
also see here [1] Salsa man (talk) 00:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kingsley Wood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article presents Sir Kingsley Wood as a Collectivist - that is not a correct view of the person.

[edit]

Sir Kingsley Wood supported very high taxation because of World War II - not because he was a follower of J.M. Keynes, the article exaggerates the closeness of their philosophies - it was a working relationship in wartime.

Also the article utterly ignores Sir Kingsley Wood's doubts about what became known as the Beverage Report - which completed the transformation of the United Kingdom into a Welfare State after World War II. 2A02:C7C:E1BA:CE00:1DFC:75B0:E26C:41CB (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rearmament in the 1930s.

[edit]

It is true that Michael Foot, in "The Guilty Men", denounced Sir Kingsley Wood, and various other people, for not rearming enough in the 1930s - but at that time Mr Foot and the Labour Party had supported disarmament (not rearmament) - the book is an example of gross hypocrisy. 2A02:C7C:E1BA:CE00:1DFC:75B0:E26C:41CB (talk) 21:04, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]