Adultery: Revision history

20 December 2024

• curprev 18:0418:04, 20 December 2024 AimanAbir18plus talk contribs 133,413 bytes 0 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit [automatically accepted]

29 November 2024

• curprev 20:0920:09, 29 November 2024 ZyphorianNexus talk contribs 133,413 bytes +5 Rejected the first text change (by 2603:7080:8600:26C1:7D24:EB4F:E552:AB59) that followed revision 1259513452 by ViridianPenguin undo [accepted by CycloneYoris]
• curprev 18:1418:14, 29 November 2024 2603:7080:8600:26c1:7d24:eb4f:e552:ab59 talk 133,408 bytes −5 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 18:1118:11, 29 November 2024 2603:7080:8600:26c1:7d24:eb4f:e552:ab59 talk 133,413 bytes −8 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 18:1018:10, 29 November 2024 2603:7080:8600:26c1:7d24:eb4f:e552:ab59 talk 133,421 bytes −26 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 18:0618:06, 29 November 2024 2603:7080:8600:26c1:7d24:eb4f:e552:ab59 talk 133,447 bytes −5 No edit summary undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

25 November 2024

• curprev 16:0916:09, 25 November 2024 ViridianPenguin talk contribs 133,452 bytes −86 →Definitions and legal constructs: Adding repeal of NY State law undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor [automatically accepted]

10 November 2024

• curprev 13:3013:30, 10 November 2024 AimanAbir18plus talk contribs 133,538 bytes 0 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit [automatically accepted]
• curprev 13:2813:28, 10 November 2024 AimanAbir18plus talk contribs 133,538 bytes −16 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit [automatically accepted]

21 October 2024

• curprev 16:3716:37, 21 October 2024 Jk55092 talk contribs 133,554 bytes +3 →Punishment: Changed the wording from reading, (regarding the criminal code of India) "no party was criminally punished in case of adultery between a married man and an unmarried woman" from " adultery" to "intercourse" because the reason it isn't punished is that it isn't adultery - at least so far as that statute is concerned. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit [automatically accepted]

30 September 2024

• curprev 18:2218:22, 30 September 2024 GreenC bot talk contribs 133,551 bytes −105 Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#foxnews.com/story undo [automatically accepted]

22 September 2024

• curprev 12:4112:41, 22 September 2024 Pepperbeast talk contribs 133,656 bytes +1,061 Undo. Unexplained changes. undo Tag: Undo [automatically accepted]
• curprev 11:5911:59, 22 September 2024 Bodha2 talk contribs m 132,595 bytes +3 →Hinduism: syntax undo Tag: Reverted [automatically accepted]
• curprev 11:5811:58, 22 September 2024 Bodha2 talk contribs 132,592 bytes −197 →Eastern religions undo Tag: Reverted [automatically accepted]
• curprev 11:5111:51, 22 September 2024 Bodha2 talk contribs 132,789 bytes −348 →Hinduism: Redundant source removed undo Tag: Reverted [automatically accepted]
• curprev 11:4511:45, 22 September 2024 Bodha2 talk contribs 133,137 bytes −97 →Hinduism: Reformatted and resourced section undo Tag: Reverted [automatically accepted]
• curprev 10:4410:44, 22 September 2024 Bodha2 talk contribs m 133,234 bytes +1 →Hinduism: punctuation undo Tag: Reverted [automatically accepted]
• curprev 10:3410:34, 22 September 2024 Bodha2 talk contribs 133,233 bytes −423 →Hinduism: Removed. Not found in cited source undo Tag: Reverted [automatically accepted]

9 September 2024

• curprev 08:0808:08, 9 September 2024 Remsense talk contribs m 133,656 bytes −84 Reverted 1 edit by Amingon (talk) to last revision by JeanetteMartin undo Tags: Twinkle Undo [automatically accepted]

5 September 2024

• curprev 10:0310:03, 5 September 2024 Amingon talk contribs 133,740 bytes +84 No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted [automatically accepted]

30 August 2024

• curprev 06:3206:32, 30 August 2024 JeanetteMartin talk contribs m 133,656 bytes −14 →Greco-Roman world undo [automatically accepted]

20 August 2024

• curprev 10:5310:53, 20 August 2024 OIM20 talk contribs 133,670 bytes −27 Rm generic name. undo [automatically accepted]

13 August 2024

• curprev 14:0614:06, 13 August 2024 Bookworm-ce talk contribs 133,697 bytes −5 some CE undo Tag: Visual edit: Switched [automatically accepted]
• curprev 11:3511:35, 13 August 2024 Zsohl talk contribs m 133,702 bytes +3,009 Reverted edits by 2406:3400:318:BE60:AD3D:2B50:4922:A91 (talk): unexplained content removal (HG) (3.4.12) undo Tags: Huggle Rollback [automatically accepted]
• curprev 11:3411:34, 13 August 2024 2406:3400:318:be60:ad3d:2b50:4922:a91 talk 130,693 bytes −3,009 →Hinduism: Updated the page with correct info undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

15 July 2024

• curprev 03:3603:36, 15 July 2024 Annh07 talk contribs 133,702 bytes −7 Reverted 1 pending edit by 2603:6000:C305:78DF:8640:AD57:475E:799F to revision 1234505655 by Nick Levine undo Tag: Manual revert [automatically accepted]
• curprev 03:3203:32, 15 July 2024 2603:6000:c305:78df:8640:ad57:475e:799f talk 133,709 bytes +7 →Criticism of adultery laws undo Tag: Reverted

14 July 2024

• curprev 18:1618:16, 14 July 2024 Nick Levine talk contribs 133,702 bytes −1,029 Reverted 2 pending edits by 2603:6000:C305:78DF:9A00:4064:7A13:5DC6 to revision 1232088794 by Fabrickator: Misplaced and unsourced undo Tag: Manual revert [automatically accepted]
• curprev 18:0818:08, 14 July 2024 2603:6000:c305:78df:9a00:4064:7a13:5dc6 talk 134,731 bytes +80 →Criticism of adultery laws undo Tag: Reverted
• curprev 18:0518:05, 14 July 2024 2603:6000:c305:78df:9a00:4064:7a13:5dc6 talk 134,651 bytes +949 →Adultery and the law undo Tag: Reverted

1 July 2024

• curprev 22:0122:01, 1 July 2024 Fabrickator talk contribs 133,702 bytes +488 add numerous wikilinks in citations undo [automatically accepted]

28 June 2024

• curprev 13:3413:34, 28 June 2024 Nick Levine talk contribs 133,214 bytes +1,103 Reverted 1 pending edit by Trika Shaivism to revision 1231428933 by City of Silver: Insufficient explanation for removing all four citations and the text to which they refer undo Tag: Manual revert [automatically accepted]
• curprev 12:3312:33, 28 June 2024 Trika Shaivism talk contribs 132,111 bytes −1,103 News article not quoting any scholarly source. I am attaching the medhaditi commentary over manusmriti verse 5.154 https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/manusmriti-with-the-commentary-of-medhatithi/d/doc200540.html undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed Visual edit
• curprev 06:5306:53, 28 June 2024 City of Silver talk contribs 133,214 bytes +3,276 Reverted 1 pending edit by Trika Shaivism to revision 1229160257 by Bbb23: poorly explained removal of heavily sourced content. not sure why this person used the singular word "source" when they removed 4 of them; also not sure about the emphasis on citing to a primary source since that's actually not the preferred way of doing things undo Tag: Manual revert [automatically accepted]
• curprev 06:4006:40, 28 June 2024 Trika Shaivism talk contribs 129,938 bytes −3,276 Not from scholarly source and radical fringe opinion. Not cited from primary source and lacks the commentaries work undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

15 June 2024

• curprev 06:1606:16, 15 June 2024 Bbb23 talk contribs m 133,214 bytes +4,254 revert sock undo Tag: Rollback [automatically accepted]
• curprev 04:4704:47, 15 June 2024 Truth Seeker Alway talk contribs 128,960 bytes −1,104 Manusmriti verse 5.154 doesn't tell that wife worship husband even if he is adulterous. Medhaditi commentary doesn't impiles that things. Her husband’s regions’—The regions to which she has become entitled by the performance of religions acts in the company of her husband. ‘Being desirous’ of reaching those regions,—‘she should never do anything that might be disagreeable’; i.e., such acts as intercourse with other men and so forth, which have been forbidden by the Scriptures. It is not possibl undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit [automatically accepted]
• curprev 04:3304:33, 15 June 2024 Truth Seeker Alway talk contribs 130,064 bytes −977 Weak and misunderstanding of verse of narad smriti. I am citing the Ashaya commentary on it. https://ia601304.us.archive.org/25/items/Bibliotheca_Indica_Series/InstitutesOfNaradaWithExtractsFromCommentaries-JuliusJolly1885bis.pdf undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit [automatically accepted]
• curprev 04:3004:30, 15 June 2024 Truth Seeker Alway talk contribs 131,041 bytes −2,173 Not credible the source and fring understanding of srimad bhagavatam source. I am citing the the sri vallabhacharya's commentary o srimad bhagavatam to understand the general understanding of verse. https://archive.org/details/Srisubodhiniji_anuvaadsahit_part01hindi2/srisubodhiniji_anuvaadsahit_part05%28hindi%29/page/n309/mode/2up undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit [automatically accepted]

14 June 2024

• curprev 14:3014:30, 14 June 2024 Pepperbeast talk contribs 133,214 bytes +3,889 This is a major change that needs to be discussed. undo Tag: Undo [automatically accepted]
• curprev 14:2814:28, 14 June 2024 Truth Seeker Alway talk contribs 129,325 bytes −1,434 Out of context meaning of verse without reading the Asahaya and Bhavasvamin commentaries. https://dn790007.ca.archive.org/0/items/Bibliotheca_Indica_Series/InstitutesOfNaradaWithExtractsFromCommentaries-JuliusJolly1885bis.pdf undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit [automatically accepted]
• curprev 14:2014:20, 14 June 2024 Truth Seeker Alway talk contribs 130,759 bytes −1,020 Srimad bhagavatam commentaries doesn't implies the adultery in srimad bhagavatam verse. https://archive.org/details/Srisubodhiniji_anuvaadsahit_part01hindi2/srisubodhiniji_anuvaadsahit_part05%28hindi%29/page/n309/mode/2up?view=theater undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit [automatically accepted]
• curprev 14:1814:18, 14 June 2024 Truth Seeker Alway talk contribs 131,779 bytes −332 Bhagavatam verse doesn't imples the adultery in first place. I am attaching the work of sri vallabhacharya sri subodhini which is detail commentary over the srimad bhagavatam. https://archive.org/details/Srisubodhiniji_anuvaadsahit_part01hindi2/srisubodhiniji_anuvaadsahit_part05%28hindi%29/page/n309/mode/2up?view=theater undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit [automatically accepted]
• curprev 14:0714:07, 14 June 2024 Truth Seeker Alway talk contribs 132,111 bytes −1,103 Manusmriti verse 5.154 doesn't tell that wife worship husband even if he is adulterous. Medhaditi commentary doesn't impiles that things. Her husband’s regions’—The regions to which she has become entitled by the performance of religions acts in the company of her husband. ‘Being desirous’ of reaching those regions,—‘she should never do anything that might be disagreeable’; i.e., such acts as intercourse with other men and so forth, which have been forbidden by the Scriptures. It is not possibl undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit [automatically accepted]

1 June 2024

• curprev 05:2205:22, 1 June 2024 CrocodileUnderling talk contribs 133,214 bytes −17 →Greco-Roman world: needs copyediting undo [automatically accepted]

1 March 2024

• curprev 06:2306:23, 1 March 2024 Rodney Baggins talk contribs 133,231 bytes −14 Reverted 1 pending edit by 106.51.61.69 to revision 1195232759 by N.A. , Freibierfan: This sentence is specifically making a vague comparison between the concept of adultery in Christianity, Judaism and Islam; the concept in Hinduism is covered in Eastern religions section undo Tag: Manual revert [automatically accepted]
• curprev 05:3805:38, 1 March 2024 106.51.61.69 talk 133,245 bytes +14 Hinduism was missing from the relegions that forbids Adultery undo Tag: Reverted

12 January 2024

• curprev 22:3922:39, 12 January 2024 N.A. , Freibierfan talk contribs 133,231 bytes +14 Link undo [automatically accepted]

9 January 2024

• curprev 01:3901:39, 9 January 2024 WikiCleanerBot talk contribs m 133,217 bytes 0 v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tag: WPCleaner [automatically accepted]

2 January 2024

• curprev 13:0413:04, 2 January 2024 Polarbear678 talk contribs 133,217 bytes +8 Some additions undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit [automatically accepted]