User talk:Reviewer1830

Hello, Reviewer1830! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 01:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juan de Lángara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cape St. Vincent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did it ever occur to you that all the articles you are adding tree-lists to don't have tree lists for a reason? Cinderella157 (talk) 06:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

To address your question, I don't see any problem with regards to adding tree lists in military-related infoboxes. Tree lists are a more structured, streamlined way to organize wars, campaigns, and battles within an infobox, as opposed to bullet points or any other manner. They also allow for a seamless potential expansion should it be warranted. Reviewer1830 (talk) 01:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They introduce unnecessary visual clutter, and you shouldn't automatically add them when there isn't a clear reason to. Remsense ‥ 论 00:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. Respectfully, I don't see how it adds clutter, at least in general. Tree lists (from my perspective at least) still appear to be a more structured, streamlined way to organize wars, campaigns, and battles within an infobox, as opposed to clunkier bullet points.

Nonetheless, I do see your point, particularly with individuals with extensive combat experience. Putting that information into a tree list can produce a somewhat chaotic result, especially if there are multiple indentations with regards to campaigns and battles.

And while I have been active in adding tree lists lately, I haven't added them to every infobox with a military service section. Sometimes I organize the conflicts and battles using tools such as {{br}} and {{plainlist}}.

Overall, keep in mind that my edits are in good faith. Thank you! 😉 Reviewer1830 (talk) 02:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please consider other means to remedy typographical runts rather than hitting them with linebreaks—linebreaks have semantic value. Consider wrapping text in {{nowrap}} instead to force it onto its own line. Remsense ‥ 论 00:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! I'll use {{nowrap}} for removing runts going forward! Reviewer1830 (talk) 02:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please consider the semantics of what you are doing when transforming lists en masse. Creating a one-member list for the result of something is semantically incorrect and therefore creates concrete problems e.g. for screen reader users. Only structure something as a list if it is actually a list.

In any case, WP:RESULT says there should be no bullet points in that parameter at all, so I recommend enforcing what the guideline actually says while you're at it. Remsense ‥ 论 23:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexei Ivanovich Avtonomov. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Come on man, we're busy enough without this stuff. We are grown-ups here. Herostratus (talk) 17:53, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Vandalism? I only added a link within that article's infobox on September 5.

Looking through the edit history of the page in question, I saw your own edit from today, where you rightfully deleted an anachronistic mention of that individual serving in the Vietnam War, something that I most certainly did not add. That piece of clearly incorrect information was entered not by me, but by an unregistered user on June 27.

Please look more closely at who made the vandalizing edit before making threats to remove editing privileges. Thank you. Reviewer1830 (talk) 19:22, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]