User talk:Ranjithsiji

Why are you editing User:Neon's userpage? → ROUX ₪ 09:00, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is my original User Name. That is why editing the Same. While trying to register username Neon on Commons it is not getting. So I Selected another user Name.--Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

okay... what you should have done was gone here and had the username changed. That way your edit history, preferences, etc would be kept with your new account. → ROUX ₪ 10:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User:Neon with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• A edit summary would have helped! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

You are deleting rare kutiyattam pics that I uploaded (using scanner & photoshop) , which are very very rare and an asset to wiki. I had given ALL rights to wiki for those rare pics. I want to make them stay here.. dont do this. Sreekanthv (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any further information about the image you uploaded, such as date, material, area/tradition it comes from, identity of the other human figure shown etc? Thanks. Abecedare (talk) 03:32, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately no Idea. Because this is an exhibit in GOA Museum (A restricted area where photography is not allowded). I taken this photo on my mobile phone. There is a small description but now I cannot remember. If I go to GOA Museum next time I definitely note that description. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ranjitsinghji for the reply. Hope you are able to make another trip to museum at some point, because (besides the benefit to wikipedia) I am personally curious in particular about the other human figure shown in the sculpture, which I guess has an associated legend. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 22:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Neon~enwiki/Herbivore, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Neon~enwiki/Herbivore and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Neon~enwiki/Herbivore during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Keφr 08:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of State Protected Monuments in Kerala

added links pointing to Paravur and Marine Drive

Thiru Nayathode Siva Narayana Temple

added a link pointing to Siva

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done- confirmed --Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ranjithsiji. I see you are involved in the organization of WAM on the Malayalam Wikipedia. I thought I should draw your attention to the focus on Asian women we are presenting on the EN Wiki. You might feel inspired to extend this to those participating in Malayalam or in other Indian languages. We would also welcome your own participation.--Ipigott (talk) 13:07, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ranjithsiji. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I just wanted to let you know that I have moved Amazonum Kure Vyakulathakalum to Draft:Amazonum Kure Vyakulathakalum as it does not contain any references at this time. This allows you (and other editors should they choose) more time to work with improving the article as it could have been tagged for deletion without references. Thank you for the work you have done so far & please feel free to submit to AfC or move it back to the article namespace once reliable and independent references have been added and other improvements made. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:14, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article contained the draft template so I moved it back to the draft namespace. If the template was added in error, please remove it and wait for the redirect in the article namespace to be deleted (when this text turns red) and feel free to move it back. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amazonum Kure Vyakulathakalum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 07:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ranjithsiji, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ranjithsiji,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Amalendu Dasgupta for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ranjith

I was really impressed to see your tool Wiki Stats for the UNESCO Challenge (which I'm helping organise). Please could you tell me if its possible for your tool to provide multilingual and multiproject results, ie to have what you have created for Malayalam Wikipedia but for all languages and all projects? This would be really helpful in reporting results back to UNESCO about what the competition achieved in an easy to understand visual way.

Many thanks

--John Cummings (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found your name at Category:User js (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), in the level-unspecified list of JavaScript programmers.

I was wondering how experienced you are at JavaScript, and whether you might be interested in getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.

We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you know of any good ones, please add them.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

please expand the article itself as well

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amazonum Kure Vyakulathakalum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Osprey

[edit]

Please don't keep adding your image. Read the "undo" edit summaries. This is an FA, so there is little chance of you image being accepted Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 (talk) 01:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Marthanda Varma Bridge, Ranjithsiji!

Wikipedia editor Anoptimistix just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your contributions I have patrolled you page. I observed you haven't placed Infobox , refer WP:IB it has a complete list of Ibfoboxes mark-up codes. Thanks Happy Editing

To reply, leave a comment on Anoptimistix's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Anoptimistix Let's Talk 08:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I request you to give protection to the Mangalore article and monitor it, regarding vandalism.
No Administrator is protecting this article and it could be delisted (removed) from the list of Featured Articles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review#Mangalore 223.186.245.115 (talk) 14:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ranjithsiji. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cheruthony Dam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^{T go beyond} 13:43, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Ariyittuvazhcha Kovilakam.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Citation #4 is not reliable and should be replaced with a citation to a more reliable source. Additionally, the article is currently difficult to understand for readers who are not already familiar with the Ariyittuvazhcha ceremony.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Dear Rosguill, I don't know what is this ceremony is. I created this article based on the sources cited. I got the information of the location from archeological dept of kerala. So at the moment I cannot replace the citeation #4. And I am not a historian or a person connected with Kerala history. To improve this article a real person who know about this place and Kerala history needed. I will search for one. If I get a person I will do the peer review. At the moment I am help less. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 03:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ranjithsiji. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 08:21, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Will try to follow the rule. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed your table because the article already has a section on protests/hartals with several paragraphs totaling about 500 words. I think we should either deal with this in prose (which allows more detail) or a table, not both. I also removed an entry because the source said " There is no mention about the BJP’s stir or Sabarimala in his statement." so that doesn't belong in the article at all. If you want to discuss this please use the article talk page. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 08:24, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no mention of Harthal in the article. In Kerala protest and harthal is different. Also which source said " There is no mention about the BJP’s stir or Sabarimala in his statement." Please read the complete article. See this The party (BJP) called for a harthal, this issue is verymuch connected with Sabarimala.I can give you more sources, see these news 1,2,3,4,5 and you can realize that BJP called for that harthal. Also Harthals and Protests are different in Kerala And yes I am on the discussion of the article page. please respond. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I was looking for some small help. I created a new article en:Kithaab-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in Malayalam languages ml:കിത്താബ്. Looking for your possible help in translating the remaining article en:Kithaab to your language article ml:കിത്താബ്. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.

Completing the article ml:കിത്താബ്. translation and updation on Malayalam Wikipedia will be helpful in accuracy of translations in other language wikipedias & other language wikipedias can be encouraged to translate before 8March women's day.

Sorry I do not know Malayalam other Indian languages properly. Translated article in Hindi with help of google translator seems reasonable. Translation and correction support most welcome.

Thanking you , with warm regards

Bookku (talk) 06:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Manthrikappoocha, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Of the three sources currently provided, #1 is a dead link, and #2 and #3 are just listings for the subject in a library database. We need citations to articles with significant, independent coverage of the subject in reliable sources, such as reviews in newspapers or magazines. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:58, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: added enough references from magazines, newspapers, university websites and submitted for review. waiting now... Ranjithsiji (talk) 08:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Manthrikappoocha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Many thanks for participating in the SVG Translation Campaign 2019 in India. It had been quite a successful campaign—194 users from 19 Indic languages took part in the campaign for 38 days, and have created more than 2,500 SVG files, all of them having labels in native Indian languages. You may read the complete report of the campaign at https://w.wiki/3yn.

We would like to thank you again for translating SVG files as a part of this campaign, your contributions have given thousands of people the knowledge that they need the most. Now we would like to have your feedback about the overall campaign, how effective were the training sessions, the resources provided, the support etc.

Please fill the feedback survey at https://forms.gle/4TCicfYzjAGVvKTy6

Your responses are extremely valuable to us, and will be of immense help to understand further training needs or plan future activities in this area. Let us know if you have any questions.

Please note that 4 August 2019 is the last date to complete the survey. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ranjithsiji. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Margaret Pavamani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 19:19, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mookkannoor Govt. Higher Secondary School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Steven (Editor): can you help? what kind of reference for which fact needed to move the article to main namespace? Because there is lot of references. Non governmental, articles, published books etc. So can you explain a little bit more? --Ranjithsiji (talk) 11:24, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Ranjithsiji I've seen that you have raised objections to the proposal of the page with the CAA protest page. But you have not made your stance clear with either a Keep or a Merge, therefore if you intend to contribute in that regard, would you do so on the Talk:Human chain in Kerala, 2020 page? Tayi Arajakate (talk) 00:16, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parvathi Nenmenimangalam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

- The9Man ^(Talk) 07:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article K. K. Usha, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:33, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Pratijnayaugandharayana, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cabayi (talk) 19:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi That was enough of a draft space play. Let it be remain there. OK and Thankyou for that quick action.--Ranjithsiji (talk) 19:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi Added some references to the article. If it is not sufficient you are welcome to delete the article. I hope in future some other person will start it again. Have a nice day. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:47, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's a big blue Submit button you can use if you think it's ready for consideration. Cabayi (talk) 20:50, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi I afraid I will never use that thing. Because I am starting only very relevant articles in this wiki and I am filling references (some what very important) to every sentances in the article. I never thought that somebody would consider the information. So why I would care. My first expectation of creating a new article is that It will be deleted from English Wikipedia. So I Don't care now a days. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your problem. Malayalam wiki also has verifiability requirements - ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:പരിശോധനായോഗ്യത - which you're supposed to uphold. Cabayi (talk) 22:23, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi The problem is not verifiability. It is absolutely not adding Unreferenced tag on the article. But the problem is moving a relevant article like this into Draft space within 24 hours and pushing it to a long pending review pipeline. At least a 'trusted user/relevant article' must be excluded from this procedure. I am not trying to create a marketing doucment for Bhasa (Who lived in 3rd century CE). If you move this to draft I will definitely leave the article. I had done that before this. Now a days it is incredibly difficult to add credible information into English Wiki. So just be there. No hard feelings. Others will come and do the following. BOOM. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:53, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "a 'trusted user/relevant article' must be excluded from this procedure" - this already happens - Wikipedia:Autopatrolled
• "moving a relevant article like this into Draft space within 24 hours" - how many times do you think we should review new aricles? Where would we find the extra manpower to do this extra work? The pressures on a wiki with 6.2 million articles and 40 million editors are less forgiving than those on a wiki with 71 thousand articles and 145 thousand editors. We have a hard enough time looking at all the new material without doubling the workload with a requirement to come back and check again 24 hours later.
• "it is incredibly difficult to add credible information into English Wiki" - hmmm, your article had no sources so forgive me if I don't rush to agree it was credible. You could have started in your userspace and had virtually unlimited time to work on it before moving it to mainspace. You could have started in draftspace and collaborated with other editors there with unlimited working time before moving it to mainspace.

Repeatedly creating unsourced articles in mainspace (1,2) is deliberately courting difficulties - more so given that you are aware of the process. To me, the issue was entirely a question of the article's verifiability, which it totally lacked.

It's regrettable that you've now made it a point of principle to NOT press the Submit button - after all it's not about the effort involved, as this discussion shows. I don't know what you intend to show by your stand against submitting the draft for review, but I won't interfere with your protest, I won't submit it either (nor is it my place to decide if you think you're ready for the draft to be reviewed). Happy editing, Cabayi (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi - My decision of NOT press the Submit button came from so many bad experiences like deletion of an article without intimation or discussion, deletion of facts without discussion, Long pending review line for article, Non removal of tags after proper action etc.

• I forgot that I don't have autopatrol rights. So I am not a trusted user in English wiki. That is understandable and now I found that why the articles created by me is keep on dumping into draft. That is why I am not creating more articles here. OK Let it be there.
• I think that if a person reviews and put a tag then that is enough. NPP works a fantastic way to do that also(I had enough NPP experience, I am usually doing that thing with Twinkle. But the team not benefit from my work because I don't have the right. It is just another experiment to test how NPP works and also to study how to resolve the orphan problem. And also for fun.). If the article is controversial or advertisement then there is good point in moving it to draft. In that way the draft load can also be reduced.
• Writing an article and adding references simultaneously is a very difficult task. I think the process is write article -> add references -> Edit the loose facts -> Expand it. Now you will tell me after all this go publish. My understanding this is not the way a wiki works. It is an everybody can edit space, even without a username. If something is not right or goes wrong the experienced people can handle it. There are a lot of tools and ways to do that. It is understandable if a user is a newbie then put the person into draft. But a person like me (I already have enough wiki experience, in user level-My first edit is on 2005, in technical level-I created tools for wmflabs, in mediawiki level-I am a maintainer of 5 other wikis which uses mediawiki) pushing into draft feels like very high insult. That is why I am not editing or creating new articles here.
• My thought is that in future AI and ML will handle this process. So It will translate all the articles available in all the wikis to other languages better than humans do. Abstract wikipedia and Wikidata Lexemes are a good start in this direction. So concentrate on my home wiki (Headache is verymuch less there). Write more article there and Machine will do the rest.
• So somebody will come and Press the Blue Button OR I am waiting to get things sorted out OR you can simply delete it. And I will try to do lesser edits here. And create a new article if it extremely required.
• Another Idea is I will create a new one on my personal user space as a personal draft. So that any other person cannot touch. It is like the development hell in Hollywood. I can take years to complete a single article.
• (1,2) Are two different experiments to test how admins here behaves to other editors. In (Here) I added enough references to sentence and It hadn't pushed to draft space. But (Here) I hadn't got enough stable references (excluding blogs, posts, news etc) to expand the article.
• If the admins trust me then they must give me more than 24 hours to add enough references into an article (I am doing other works to live). If they are not trusting me (Current status) it is very much OK for me to be pushed into draft, unreferenced, delete and I don't care.

And thank you for your initiative to talk to me. And thanks for you good words. Previous Admins I talked here was so arrogant and tough for good discussions. Happy wiki time. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 12:05, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From your comments, "pushing into draft feels like very high insult" and "If the admins trust me then they must give me more than 24 hours" it's clear you take the admin actions as a judgement on you. They're not. They're an assessment of the text you've contributed.

Autopatrolled is not given to editors to allow them to ignore the required standards, but as a recognition that they always adhere to the requirements. Your experiments are unfortunately creating a history which would make it less likely that you would be given autopatrolled on enwiki.

As for your hopes for AI, ML & machine translation - it's been frequently discussed but the community's view has consistently been that machine translations into English are too poor quality to be permitted. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 18:27, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cabayi - For sure they are judgements of ignorance of the subject. I am very much sure the judged admin had no idea about the topic. Multiple times I got that right. Admins must judge with the knowledge and sense. And talking is your best friend and that most people not doing because they don't have time.

I don't need a recognition for anything I am doing or written for. Because "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what I am doing." and that is my commitment and I was in the list already. So getting into the list automatically is higher than getting it. And I already had lot of these *s in my language wiki. You cannot catch me from my history I am sure about that. I have enough knowledge about how a wiki works, what is inside it, how to trace, how to anaylise etc.

for AI, ML & machine translation - Those are not hopes those things are going to happen in future. Wikidata is not 10year old but It is making a lot (Biggest edited project is WM). And Abstract Wikipedia is the biggest thing coming. And no discussion needed because the foundation already announced the project.

So that is all. If admins care that is good for project. If admins rogue the project sinks. For En wiki, it is the biggest wiki with articles. And a lot of complaints about the bad admin behaviour. Hope admins will act with more sense. Regards, --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ranjithsiji and Cabayi I eventually came here through Draft:Pratijnayaugandharayana. As the article is about one of the most important plays in the history of Sanskrit literature, I am going to add some information whith references. And then I will move it to main space. Ranjithsiji: Keep contributing to Wikipedia, and if you need any help with literature related article, feel free to ask me on my talk page. --Gazal world (talk) 13:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gazal world Thanks for your interest. The sad part is that, such an important article is just moved to draft space. And people arguing me to develop it there and wait for review. Now I got the reason, I am not a trusted user here. I started editing Wikipedia on 2005. In my old account I had 2000 edits here before 2010. On those times I created articles, edited articles and nobody is asking questions like this. This account was created on 2010 after the username unification happened and I lost my old accounts. I had big plans to write/develop articles about Geography of Kerala, Important literature of India which don't have enough information in this wiki. But what holding back is this behaviour. Now I realize that I am not a trusted user, no auto-patrol rights. I am a bureaucrat in my home wiki but things are not working here. So trying to apply for autopatrol rights here. If it works then will try to do something here. Otherwise I will concentrate on my home wiki and Wikidata. There is a lot of job to do. Happy editing. Thanks for stopping by. Regards - --Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ranjithsiji: Don't be discouraged. English Wikipedia is a more globalised community and rules are followed more stringently here due to its size and more likelihood of vandalism. The whole discussion was unwarranted. In English Wikipedia here, anything without reference or unaware/unknown things are more likely to be draftified because of the vanalism issues in managing such a large encyclopedia. Just simply adding few references would have made it easier to pass/patrolled. I know, It is annoying to feel untrustworthy but do understand that things are looked here with more suspicion than other Wikipedias.

You can create new articles with references and ping me to review it quickly after submitting the draft. So rules are followed and you get your work done faster. But, I would be able to review only literature/writers related articles. --Gazal world (talk) 15:50, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Ranjith. Just to let you know that I have published the article Pratijnayaugandharayana. I will work on it and expand it further sometime later. While working on this article, I came to know about one of the important Indian writers, A. S. P. Ayyer. I have started writing a draft (Draft:A. S. P. Ayyar) on him. Thank you. --Gazal world (talk) 20:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 May 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Dennis Joseph, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 20:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 25 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Parassala B. Ponnammal, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
WikiProject India Tag & Assess 2021 has started. The India WikiProject has a backlog of around 10,000 unassessed articles, built up over the last few years. The time has come for comprehensive housekeeping and that's what this drive is all about. The drive will run from 1 September 2021 to 30 September 2021.

We request you to participate in the assessment drive. Learn more about the event here, learn assessment process and rewards details. Please add your name as a participant here.

Feel free to discuss this on the event talk page or at WikiProject India noticeboard.

You received this message, because you participated in earlier iteration of the assessment drive, or we felt that you may be interested to participate. --Titodutta (talk) 01:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She is not in Vendhu Thanindhathu Kaadu. You can ask User:Kailash29792. DareshMohan (talk) 05:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kayadu Lohar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayadu Lohar. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Tulsi 24x7 06:03, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayadu Lohar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayadu Lohar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 10:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ranjithsiji. Thank you for your work on Khali Purse of Billionaires. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add some reviews.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 13:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know how to add the reviews. What is the style, where can I find those. I am not an expert. Ranjithsiji (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am editior in English wikipedia from 2010. I never got any kind of block in english wikipedia. But recently I encountered in an IP block. I dont know how this happened. Accoring to online websites my ip is 103.85.207.179. Please unblock this IP so that I can contribute to english wikipedia again. Hope this message reach any of admins in English wikipedia.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ranjithsiji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.85.207.179. Place any further information here. Ranjithsiji (talk) 03:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You aren't blocked so you could edit from an unblocked address. Instead of getting the proxy block lifted, you would have better luck going down to WP:IPECPROXY and following those directions to request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ranjithsiji (talk) 03:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths in the Aegean Sea has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am editior in English wikipedia from 2010. I never got any kind of block in english wikipedia. But recently I encountered in an IP block. I dont know how this happened. Accoring to online websites my ip is 103.85.207.179. Please unblock this IP so that I can contribute to english wikipedia again. Hope this message reach any of admins in English wikipedia.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ranjithsiji (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.203.73.142. Place any further information here. Ranjithsiji (talk) 09:57, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed p2p proxy. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. Yamla (talk) 11:15, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: How can I edit english wikipeida. I already logged into into user account still I am getting this blocked message. Is logged in users got the proxy block? --Ranjithsiji (talk) 13:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logged-in users are indeed affected by proxy blocks. See Template:Blocked p2p proxy for more details. --Yamla (talk) 15:43, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I cannot edit English wikipedia. Also My friends cannot edit English wikipedia. OK. I am planning to do a workshop about wikimedia projects to college students. So if this is not working then unfortunately I must cancell the programme. That seems very sad to me. Thank you @Yamla: for the explanation.

WikiProject Kerala Newsletter JULY 2024

Newly Nominated content Western Ghats Open tasks You can add your suggestions for open tasks here Articles to be improved Malabar River Festival Edamalayar Edayattoor Erattayar Ezhuvathiruthy Gayathripuzha River High Range, Kerala Holy Land Chalakudy Irumbuzhi

WikiProject Kerala Main page talk Participants Newsletter talk  → Subscribe  → Contriute  → Archive Article alerts Popular pages Articles Delsort Todo tasks Cleanup Templates Sandbox User group Miscellaneous We need more contributors for the newsletter. Feel free to add your ideas here We want to give the newsletter a unique name. Please add your suggestions here. Events These are some of the events in Kerala in the month of July Malabar River Festival, 25-28 July, 2024 Muharram, 16 or 17 July, 2024

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Contribute
• Subscribe/Unsubscribe
• Archive

---

Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject Kerala. © Copyleft 2024.
Go here to unsubscribe if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mokksha, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mokksha, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Meenakshi Raveendran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meenakshi Raveendran. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give an answer to my post on the article's talkpage? Ranjithsiji (talk) 12:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Deb:,

Subject : About deletion of the Article Meenakshi Raveendran without pinging me.

I am Ranjithsiji from Kerala, India (Was a Colony of UK before 1947). You just deleted Article Meenakshi Raveendran without pinging me or even putting your opinion in the speedy deletion discussion which was happened in Talk:Meenakshi Raveendran with me and @Jeraxmoira:.

You just said that "A much better draft already exists" on the deletion log only. I cannot ask for undeletion of the article at WP:DRV because the talk page was also deleted.

The original problem was when I started the article the redlink page was not linked to the Draft:Meenakshi Raveendran which was showing now. So I don't have an information about an existing draft. I am the only person who edited that article and simply delete a page without pinging me is not a good practice in Wikipedia. I am not trying to do any kind of VANDALISM.Also this article passes the notability criteria.

You just spoiled my work done on this article. And @UtherSRG: says that there is no way to get my article back. This is a real bad practice and I feel sad for you.

I am Bureaucrat and sysop in my home wikipedia and I have enough experience in handling all kind of admin tools.

So before doing any kind of destruction just consider the hard work of editors. If I am doing any kind of bad to wikipedia then you have all the right to punish me. What you just did was destroying all the work that done by me using the power with you. If you can consider me then I think you will find a way to solve this problem. If you are not consider the scenario then can I recreate the article you just deleted.

Hope we meet again in English Wikipedia,

Have a good day and nice evenings.

Regards and Best Wishes. Ranjithsiji (talk) 12:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Ranjithsiji. I'm sorry I didn't follow my usual practice of leaving you a message. I don't like to criticise you, but the article I deleted was badly written, in very poor English, and didn't make a proper claim of notability. The draft version is far better and has been in draft for a very long time, so you should have checked for it before you tried to create a new one. For some reason it hasn't been submitted for review yet, so I invite you to work on that and then submit it for an independent review. Deb (talk) 13:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Deb: I understood the point. Why I started the article because there was no warning on the page that this article was deleted previously, there was a Draft of this article etc.. Usually when I try to recreate a deleted article there is a message about that. Why this article is in very poor english because no copyvio edit was done. It was in a work in progress state. the was proper claim of notability on talk page. The current draft version is in a bad shape. My practice of creating a new article in Wikipedia is click a red link and start writing. That was a practice for a lot of early editors for a long time. I started editing in 2005. So DRAFT thing is relatively new. And the articles I created contains enough things. Usually not in bad shape.

The thing happened was Just deleted the article and talk page (where a discussion is ongoing) in the middle.

Now you are helpless and I am also helpless about what was happened. What I feel is very sad.

My Advice is that before press the DELETE button please click some links and enquire about what is happening around things and warn people.

I got a lot of very very very bad experience in English Wikipedia from the admins. That is why I am holding back writing here.

Still I am "Imagining a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge."

OK. Bye. Have good days and Nice evenings.

Regards. Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"It was in a work in progress state" - that's why it should have been started in draft, not in article space. Draft space has been available for more than ten years - it isn't new - and you didn't begin on English Wikipedia until 2010 so AfC was always available to you. There are also templates you can use to indicate that an article is unfinished, and these have been around since 2005. If you had begun by creating a draft, you would have known that someone else had already done so. You're right in saying that the current draft isn't ready for mainspace yet, but it is much better than the version you tried to create in article space, so I didn't "spoil" anything; your version just wasn't anywhere near good enough. If you're having "bad experiences" with admins, it could be because you don't understand the advice you are being given. For someone with limited English, clicking on a red link is not a good way to start an article unless you have already prepared the text in your sandbox and obtained help from an English speaker. My advice to you is to use the Draft facility every time you want to start an article from now on, otherwise you are going to hit the same problems time and time again. Deb (talk) 14:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are an admin here. Then please read the first comment in this talk page and do some investivation. Then you will find the answer of WHEN I started editing English wikipedia (That is not a matter of discussion here).

I usually start edit an english wikipedia article in my computer with a text editor (Vim, Nano). Then I copy the article with enought templates into this wiki. Why I do this because some patrolers tag very soon. Admins delete very soon. Why I am not using Draft is because there is good backlog.

I only create new article which is very much notable. But some admins can't understand. I got a notability request for the work of Bhasa.

Now a days I prepare article in my computer getting help from chatgpt.

Still I am ready to fight. Don't care if someone delete it. I am meeting enough people those who had same bad experience from english wikipedia in all wikimedia conferences. So I am not alone.

My advice is that the admins in English Wikipedia must work to make English Wikipiedia a better place for editors.

Will think about drafts future. Testing waters. Ranjithsiji (talk) 15:21, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are around 20 basic English errors in this rant. Do not try to create an article using Chatgpt; it will be obvious to anyone reading your article. Do not assume that you are right and everyone else is wrong; you aren't and they aren't. Disruptive editing can lead to you being blocked; if you want to avoid that, I recommend you take notice of the advice you've been given. If you carry on "fighting", as you put it, you could end up being prevented from editing here. I would be very unhappy to see you shooting yourself in the foot. Deb (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am shooting myself in the foot here for last 8 years . I am not a native UK English speaker or US English speaker. There are big contradictions in different English in the world. And errors are natural in a Wikipedia Article. And to correct those errors people are using [EDIT] button.

I always assume that I am wrong and others are right. I will try to think from the other side too. So I do a lot of research to get more correct version of things. There is no absolute truth or absolute error in the universe. Every thing is relative to perspective.

I am not doing any kind of Disruptive editing. If any one disrupt my editing I stop there. That is my policy. The License CC-BY-SA-4.0 says that you remix, transform, or build upon the material. So when you press publish the material is not yours only.

Usually I prevent my self from editing here. So I am not doing a lot of work that can be done here using various kinds of tools in my possession.

My thought is that let English Wikipedia people must find their way.

I am an open knowledge volunteer. Wikipedia editing is one way of contributing to open knowledge. I am running a science journal in my language with CC-BY-SA-4.0 License. I am running a wiki for schools in my language. I am creating a lot of free software (free as in freedom).

So if people disrupt me for non legitimate reasons then I stop here.

You deleted an article which passed the notability criteria in English Wikipedia. It does not matter whether it was written by me or any other editor because of CC-BY-SA-4.0. Yes there was a draft. But that was there for last 3 months. Due to the complexity of the process in English Wikipedia you are now helpless to reinstate the article. The only thing you can do is to move the Draft article into main namespace. According to the subject of the article I am not a concerned party. So I am not so worried about moving the draft.

Everything in the universe will come into Wikipedia. Time is the only constraint. So people can wait. Everything after a 100 years is a part of open knowledge. So Harvest now, decrypt later is the best attack. And Everything is inside a box so we can find it later.

OK. Bye. Have good days and Nice evenings.

Regards Ranjithsiji (talk) 18:48, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, I am not helpless. I could restore your bad article and delete the better-written draft. But I'm not going to do that. Deb (talk) 13:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, DC. Good or Bad or Draft. Deleting a Main namespace article Which passes notability criteria in Wikipedia is not a good practice. A kind of over use of power. Not good for community. Really bad for a veteran admin. Ranjithsiji (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mokksha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and The sources are IMDb type references, interviews, or about the films with only mentions of her roles. Cannot find any significant coverage of her that is reliable other than one bylined piece in TOI but that is an interview so would not count towards notability. Moving to draft as an WP:ATD. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 00:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks for the notification. I will try to work on that article. I will add more references if they are available. Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mokksha എന്ന ഡ്രാഫ്റ്റ് ഡെവലപ്പ് ചെയ്തിട്ടുണ്ട്, പക്ഷെ കാരണം പറയാതെ ഡിക്‌ലൈൻ ചെയ്യപ്പെട്ടു. ഇനി കൂടുതൽ ഡെവലപ്പ് ചെയ്യാൻ scope ഇല്ലാത്തതുകൊണ്ട് ഇനി ചെയ്യാൻ പറ്റുന്ന കാര്യം ഈ ഡ്രാഫ്റ്റിന്റെ ഉള്ളടക്കം കോപ്പി ചെയ്തു നിങ്ങളുടെ sandbox-ലേക്ക് പേസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യുക. അതിനു ശേഷം ഡ്രാഫ്റ്റ് ഡിലീറ്റ് ചെയ്യാൻ റിക്വസ്റ്റ് ചെയ്യുക. ഡിലീറ്റ് ആയതിനു ശേഷം ഇതേ ഉള്ളടക്കം വച്ച് പുതിയതായി ഒരു article തുടങ്ങുക. അത് ഡിലീറ്റ് ചെയ്യാൻ സാധ്യത കുറവാണ്. 117.230.95.94 (talk) 09:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

അവർ സാവധാനം സ്വീകരിച്ചോളും. നമുക്ക് കൂടുതൽ ഡവലപ്പ് ചെയ്യാം Ranjithsiji (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you create a page for director-producer Boban Kunchacko? He has directed, acted, and produced several films: [1][2][3]. 117.230.81.58 (talk) 13:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]