User talk:Panamitsu

Archives (Index)

2023/May 2023/June 2023/September 2023/October 1 2

Hello! Your submission of GeoNet (New Zealand) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 12:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of discontinued Guinness World Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failure to meet WP:NLIST; no discussion of this topic as a list/set among reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Happy to discuss this further on the talk page or if there is a deletion discussion page, but I do not believe notability guidelines are met for this article. No ill-will intended. Dingers5Days (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of discontinued Guinness World Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failure to meet WP:NLIST

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dingers5Days (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of discontinued Guinness World Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of discontinued Guinness World Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dingers5Days (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edmonds Band Rotunda, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the basement of the Edmonds Band Rotunda (pictured) was once used as a kitchen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edmonds Band Rotunda. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Edmonds Band Rotunda), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article E-Defense, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the E-Defense was commissioned in 2005, it was the world's largest 3D earthquake shake table? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/E-Defense. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, E-Defense), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:04, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora, the bot lives on my Github, you're welcome to fork and submit PRs. David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 21:43, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I'll take a look. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Panamitsu, I have made good progress with the Draft:1984 Southland floods article. Have archived the references and incorporated the NIWA source into the article. The article now has an introduction section. I also split the impact section into an aftermath section. Is it ready to move into mainspace? We could also link it to other articles like the Southland Region and 1984 in New Zealand. Andykatib (talk) 00:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work. I've managed to find a free-to-use image and have added it to the article. I've also moved it to mainspace and added incoming links. I haven't written about it on the Southland Region article though. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think we could put it on Did you know? I'm struggling to find something interesting about this article.

I know I said before we started that something that there was interesting about it, but it turned out I was confusing it was another event. For some reason I thought it involved a dam overflowing or almost overflowing, but it looks like that might've been the Otago floods of 1863 or the 2004 Bay of Plenty floods. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Panamitsu, good job on finding a free image and moving it to the mainspace. I don't think it is notable enough to go into the Did You Know page but it could go into the Southland Region and List of natural disasters in New Zealand pages. Cheers. Andykatib (talk) 06:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK has no notability requirement. What it requires is an interesting hook. If you can think of one, I encourage you to nominate the article. Schwede66 15:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a nomination now. ―Panamitsu (talk) 06:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know something interesting about it (in the DYK sense) but unfortunately I don't think it's documented anywhere (and "the civil defence guys thought it was a real crack up" doesn't constitute a reliable source). Apparently one of the guys "rescued" from a roof didn't actually need rescued - because of the fine weather the day after he was up on a roof painting it and was rather indignant about being "rescued". Otherwise one of the more iconic images (which, sadly, is almost certainly unavailable with a compatible licence) is of an unusual "igloo" shaped house (corner of Gimblett and Queens Drive if you're familiar with Invercargill) with only its domes visible. Daveosaurus (talk) 10:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the house still there? I'm unable to find it on Google Maps. Your comment intrigues me. ―Panamitsu (talk) 05:48, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it survived the floods but was replaced by a "normal" house some time after 2010. If you are using Google Street View, click on "See more dates" (in the top left window), select the January 2010 street view image and it's largely still visible amongst the mature trees that were also on site then. Daveosaurus (talk) 07:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Haha that's a funny looking house. Reminds me of the Dutch Bolwoningen. ―Panamitsu (talk) 08:03, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It also had a vague Futuro House look to it. I think it was concrete? It would have been quite new in 1984 - it's visible on this Retrolens image https://files.interpret.co.nz/Retrolens/Imagery/SN8408/Crown_8408_F_13/High.jpg (from nine months or so after the flood) but half of the subdivision it's in isn't built up yet. Daveosaurus (talk) 10:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, below and the trees on the top right of the image. Neat map. I wonder what the indicators on the left display. ―Panamitsu (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not certain, but my guesses, working from left to right (bottom to top) would be: some sort of gyroscope to measure camera orientation; some sort of focusing tool; a clock reading almost 3:17 p.m.; a card stating which series of photographs this was. Retrolens is an interesting resource of raw aerial photography dating right back to the 1940s. Daveosaurus (talk) 17:25, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edmonds (brand), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that housewives were encouraged to keep Edmonds baking-powder tins to be used as bombs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edmonds (brand). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Edmonds (brand)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

1=Launchballer 00:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Panamitsu, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 08:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Leonardo da Vinci (Isaacson book), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Leonardo DiCaprio was set to star in the film adaptation of Leonardo da Vinci? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Leonardo da Vinci (Isaacson book). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Leonardo da Vinci (Isaacson book)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:AWBRULES I think you should desist from adding wikilinks to reference or bundle them together with other minor fixes. You are making up to 20 edits in a minute at times with this. 1news + RNZ could've been bundled for example and it'd save a lot of edits. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Traumnovelle: What rule exactly are you referring to? I've re-read all five and am still unsure. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Number 4, although I guess that is a matter of interpretation. I don't believe there is any guideline/policy specifically prohibiting but I do feel it'd be better served if more trivial edits could be condensed into one or a slower speed is used for it. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Traumnovelle: Number 4 says:

Do not make insignificant or inconsequential edits. An edit that has no noticeable effect on the rendered page is generally considered an insignificant edit.

Do you consider adding a link as having "no noticeable effect on the rendered page"? A cosmetic change? ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:51, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a reference, yes. That is just my opinion ultimately and there is no actual policy covering this to my knowledge. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:53, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As for the bundling, I'm not sure how to. Maybe there is a way but I don't know it. I'm using the query ' "RNZ" insource:/=RNZ/ ' to find the missing links, and am not sure how to do it for both RNZ and 1News at the same time. Do you know how? ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:54, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Traumnovelle: I've stopped these edits and have asked at Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser if those edits break the rule. ―Panamitsu (talk) 03:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've never used AWB. I assumed you could bundle things together as I've often seen people make AWB edits that make several changes like this: [1] Traumnovelle (talk) 04:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe those are general fixes (which are mostly cosmetic). I could bundle multiple link changes together, but my current way of searching for missing links would need to be changed in a way that I don't know how. Do you want me to enable general fixes? ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't you be able to search for RNZ but also simultaneously add wikilinks to lets say Stuff if any exist on the change? Tying in general fixes/white space removal edits would help a bit too to reduce the amount of automated edits required. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is what I was referring to. Searching for one but adding any others that pop up at the same time would prevent having the same page being edited twice which would reduce the overall volume. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked at the talk page and the people there have said that it is not cosmetic, but have suggested that I fix multiple links at the same like you've said (e.g. both RNZ and Stuff). Do I have your permission to continue? ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need my permission, so go ahead. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:57, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Traumnovelle: Do edits like this satisfy you? I had fun writing a little Python script to generate the settings for AWB. ―Panamitsu (talk) 06:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presuming you planned on doing all of them that edit saves five edits, so yes. Thank you. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:07, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Panamitsu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samsung Galaxy S25, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1984 Southland floods, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although nobody died in the 1984 Southland floods, about 12,000 sheep perished? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1984 Southland floods. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1984 Southland floods), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edmonds (brand) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paora you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 02:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paora you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Paora and Talk:Paora/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paora you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paora for comments about the article, and Talk:Paora/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]