User talk:Jbpo

Welcome!

Hello, Jbpo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --HailFire 10:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to your comments on Talk:Estate tax (United States): Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. · j·e·r·s·y·k·o talk · 00:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per his Senate voting record, Obama has been ranked the 4th most partisan Democrat, voting with the majority of Democrats on 94.97% of the time and ranked 88th in partisan Republican voting, voting with the majority of Republicans 37.44% of the time.

I think you could be on the right track with this, though I may have a go at modifying the language slightly ("partisan" may be regarded as a negative term, I think?). Anyway, I think the content is both notable and informative, and hopefully the source reliable (it seems so). Congrats. --HailFire 10:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jbpo, stopped by to share this article with you. Not about Obama, but one I thought you'd find of interest.

I'd gathered from this post that you've viewed Obama's past legislative alliances with Republicans like Lugar, McCain, and Coburn with cynicism. Now that the tables of power have been turned, let's watch what happens over the next two months and then the next two years for fresh indicators.

Also, if you have not done so already, I encourage you to read some of Obama's new book, where he offers lots more background on how he regards the political process in general and U.S. conservatism in particular.

I've been taking a partial-wikibreak from the Barack Obama article of late, but anticipate doing some more editing, referencing, sorting, condensing, and adding now and then. If any edits that you would have liked to see left alone get impacted by this, please be free to immediately alert me on my talk page, and we might try to come to agreement there. There are no obligations to do so, of course, I'm just suggesting it as something to try because you have more then once helped me to reconsider the balance of my own editing. --HailFire 22:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit ("you are a censor and a PR Flak, by no means an editor of any value") and this edit ("Jerseyko, you are a horse's ass"): Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. · j e r s y k o talk · 17:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have some concerns about your additions to the controversy section, which I've brought up at the talk page, and which I hope you can address. Regards, Gzkn 14:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC 0267.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Stjohnta.jpg. The copy called Image:Stjohnta.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Basilica of St. John the Apostle, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.basilicaofstjohn.org/Basilica%20Information.htm. As a copyright violation, Basilica of St. John the Apostle appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Basilica of St. John the Apostle has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Basilica of St. John the Apostle and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Basilica of St. John the Apostle with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Basilica of St. John the Apostle.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Fabrictramp 15:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Tony Rezko, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Rezko and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jbpo. My name is Mike Lyons and I am a doctoral student at Indiana University. I am conducting research on the writing and editing of high traffic “current events” articles on Wikipedia. I have noticed in the talk page archives at Barack Obama that you have contributed to the editing or maintenance of the article. I was hoping you would agree to fill out a brief survey about your experience. This study aims to help expand our thinking about collaborative knowledge production. Believe me I share your likely disdain for surveys but your participation would be immensely helpful in making the study a success. A link to the survey is included below.

Link to the survey: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=P6r2MmP9rbFMuDigYielAQ_3d_3d

Thanks and best regards, Mike Lyons lyonspen | (talk) 22:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jbpo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]