User talk:Fbell74

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

• The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
• You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

A412 (talk) 16:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, unfortunately I've had to move your submission back into AfC space as it does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion at the moment. If you would like a more detailed explanation please contact me at my talk page. You can find the submission at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Giuseppe D. Pol430 talk to me 00:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Article created Pol430 talk to me 11:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AVANCE.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:17, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AVANCE.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jonadin93 (talk) 01:40, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of George Guillaume by Kris Kuksi.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AVANCE.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 16:33, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AVANCE.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 13:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kris Kuksi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 Chzz  ►  02:11, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AVANCE.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:34, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AVANCE, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
• You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CharlieEchoTango (contact) 06:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kris Kuksi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You also do not need to put your signature in edit summaries, and you should never add it to articles. I fixed your image problem, the file only works if it is preceded by a parameter that the infobox template understands, you can see the parameters at {{Infobox non-profit}}. Regards, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Glovico Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glovico.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bmusician 07:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glovico.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! JayJay^{Talk to me} 02:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Padraig Rushe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TMF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Irish Payroll Association (IPASS), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PRSI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Onyx Moonshine Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Onyx Moonshine Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Alarm Medical, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sarah (talk) 20:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Onyx Spirits Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sarah (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you so much for all of your great contributions to Wikipedia!! Sarah (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbell74. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 02:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Sarah (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this re File:Onyx Moonshine in the Attic.jpg. As to your uploads of three images of Hilliard Mill: when were these images taken? Who was the photographer? How on earth can Adam von Gootkin claim copyright? They are almost certainly now public domain. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:24, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, I've taken your comments on board and am hoping that I can rectify the issues that you mentioned. I have re-uploaded the pictures of the beverages in the Wikipedia Commons section and will obtain the author's permission for these, to be forwarded on to Wikipedia subsequently. I will not now be uploading the images of Hilliard Mills. Finally, there is a logo that I would like to upload (File:Onyx Moonshine Logo.jpg). I previously tried to do this but was obviously doing something incorrectly as it was deleted. I suspect it may have been because the information in the non-free rationale did not contain details re 'Purpose'. I can try reloading it, having included this, but am mindful of your comment re continuing to upload when faced with a warning message. I just want to make sure I'm doing this correctly. I have amended the non-free rationale as follows and would be grateful if you can can indicate whether this is acceptable? - Thank you in advance:

{Non-free use rationale logo | Article = Onyx Moonshine | Use = Brand | Owner = Onyx Spirits Company | Commentary = | Source = Onyx Spirits Company | Portion = All | Low resolution = JPEG will be rendered at low resolutions. The logo is of a size and resolution sufficient to maintain the quality intended by the company or organization, without being unnecessarily high resolution. |Purpose of use = The image is used to identify the beverage Onyx Moonshine, a subject of public interest. The significance of the logo is to help the reader identify the product, assure the readers that they have reached the right article containing critical commentary about the organization, and illustrate the organization's intended branding message in a way that words alone could not convey. | Replaceability = Because it is a logo there is almost certainly no free equivalent. Any substitute that is not a derivative work would fail to convey the meaning intended, would tarnish or misrepresent its image, or would fail its purpose of identification or commentary. }}

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UK Newspaper Coverage of the Rhea Page Story.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 17:38, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Onyx Moonshine Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
• I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Onyx Spirits Company Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Onyx Moonshine Logo2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.

Hi, Fbell. In case you didn't see my post at the Stephanie Adams AfD on this, your user page is separate from your talk page. I saved it for you because the red link sort of stuck out. Once the user page is established, you can put content on it, like pictures, text, etc. Pkeets (talk) 18:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see - thanks for clarifying. I obviously got the wrong end of the stick. I haven't edited my User page in the past, although I probably should have. Shouldn't the edit really have come from myself though? Fbell74 (talk) 00:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't really matter. I just put "User page" on it. If it hadn't come up in the discussion, you wouldn't have noticed. Click on the "User page" tab above and you'll see it. You should copy your Barnstar award to it so people can appreciate the award properly. Pkeets (talk) 02:48, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I probably wouldn't have noticed it, as I hadn't before. Thanks for the suggestion about the barnstar - good idea.Fbell74 (talk) 03:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Damien Dematra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for Ivy Queen's "En Que Fallamos" being certified Gold & Platinum as you claim in Chris Panaghi? Thank you. — DivaKnockouts 18:49, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone back trying to find a source for this but can't seem to locate it, which is frustrating. I've temporarily deleted the reference to Ivy Queen.Fbell74 (talk) 08:48, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you do, could you please let me know? :) Thanks! — DivaKnockouts 18:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DivaKnockouts. The single was part of the album 'Sentimiento' that achieved gold and platinum status. A source for this is the RIAA certification database. If you search for 'Ivy Queen' it comes up. Hope that helps Fbell74 (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Castro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheOneSean | Talk to me 16:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheOneSean - Thank you for the update on this article Fbell74 (talk) 12:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Epicgenius^{(talk to me • see my contributions)} 13:25, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Onyx Moonshine may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UK Newspaper Coverage of the Rhea Page Story, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:09, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chris "The Greek" Panaghi, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fbell74. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled UK Newspaper Coverage of the Rhea Page Story.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UK Newspaper Coverage of the Rhea Page Story}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glovico, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giuseppe D. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giuseppe D. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 08:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbell74. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions.
Message added 12:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Samwalton9 (talk) 12:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note: This is an article for which I was approached to edit and received a financial consideration for doing so.

Hello: I've working on the backlog of edit requests. Regarding John Travis (physician), I see you posted the request in January. From my quick review, it looks like you waited a reasonable period of time and then implemented. (I assume your edits were along the lines of what you requested.) If anyone gives you grief about the editing, please let me know. Also, if you have other requests that are getting stale, you ought to contact other involved editors on the particular articles and urge them to take a look before you implement on your own. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 00:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fbell74. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Glovico".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Glovico}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Illness-Wellness Continuum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Coin945 (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's great news. Thank you for letting me knowFbell74 (talk) 06:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Wellness Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 08:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Fbell74, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hell in a Bucket (talk) 08:52, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Wellness Institute and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The World Café page, your edit caused a DOI error (help), a URL error (help) and an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

National Wellness Institute, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Suzanne Arms and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^speak up! 04:14, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suzanne Arms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

--L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 10:23, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lixxx235 Thanks very much for letting me know and for your help with this.Fbell74 (talk) 04:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fbell74, have just read the article on suzanne, good job:). might i suggest a section on criticism of her work (if any:) to balance out the article? thanks for your time Coolabahapple (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good idea. I might have a look to see what I can find. Thanks Coolabahapple for the suggestion Fbell74 (talk) 06:31, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the list of peacemakers should not include Jane Fonda or Cat Stevens in order to be credible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corodo48 (talk • contribs) 05:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Corodo48. You recently left a message on my talk page saying you felt that Cat Stevens and Jane Fonda shouldn't be included in the article List of peace activists. I think this comment would be better placed on the Talk page of that article. That will help the discussion along.Fbell74 (talk) 06:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This still needs any more available coverage overall. Cheers,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Churchill Retirement Living and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Churchill Retirement Living. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 02:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Churchill Retirement Living. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Churchill Retirement Living and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:31, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Churchill Retirement Living and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RadioFan (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article must be built from information found in third-party sources (newspapers, magazines) that are independent of the subject of the article. Those sources must be referenced in-line with the text they support. No un-referenced material is allowed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Direct Line for Business and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this account is - as you say on your user page - "solely for the purpose of contributing to articles with which I may have a potential conflict of interest", then you should never edit any of these articles directly, per WP:COI. Glancing at your contributions, you added "In 2015 (name) was a Churchill Award winner." directly to a bunch of articles last month, despite declaring a COI with Churchill Awards. --McGeddon (talk) 12:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi McGeddon (talk). My understanding of the COI guidelines is that, while users are discouraged from editing where a COI or potential COI exists, that this is not prohibited. If changes pass Wikipedia's guidelines in terms of sources, neutrality and notability, then shouldn't the changes be acceptable? The awards themselves are national awards in a specialist category, which have been won in the past by individuals who would be considered notable. The awards are being run jointly by a national organisation and a national newspaper and previous judges have included Sir Roger Moore, Lawrie McMenemy and Esther Rantzen, all of whom, I would suggest can be considered notable in their own right. Additional judges have been Sir Roger Carr, former chairman of CBI and Tom Wright, Group Chief Executive of Age UK and Age International. Admittedly, some of this information hasn't been included in the Churchill Awards page, so it wouldn't have been obvious.Fbell74 (talk) 01:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are "strongly discouraged" from editing relevant articles. (If you're being paid to edit then you're "very strongly discouraged".) WP:COIADVICE gives some guidelines on what kind of editing is appropriate. Adding a single housing company's obscure award to a biography such as Harriet Harman's - which mentions no other awards, implying that this is the only significant award she's ever been given - does not improve the article, and with a WP:PRIMARY source is borderline spam.

Please also note that if you are being paid to edit Wikipedia, you must clearly state these client(s) on your user page, per WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE. --McGeddon (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point about the awards being less notable than some of the others that the winners have won, such as CBEs and so on. By that standard this award probably isn't on the same level. Fair enough.

Separately, I've updated my Talkpage with a list of the articles that I've worked on and added notes to the Talkpages of the different articles. I had done this for a most of these before, but there were a couple without a notification.Fbell74 (talk) 08:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Just to be crystal, though, WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE requires your userpage to be more specific, saying that "you must declare who is paying you, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship." --McGeddon (talk) 18:21, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. The guidelines indicated making a list on a userpage, which I had done, but I've made the nature of the relationship clearer. I realised later that some of the COI notices on the subjects' talk pages indicated a connected rather than a paid contributor, so I've amended these accordingly Fbell74 (talk) 03:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still seems questionable for the applicable notability and I'm not confident he's particularly independently notable. Inviting DGG for analysis.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emmett Miller (physician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is basically advertising for the individual. FBell74, were you paid to write this article? or is Dr. Miller connect with the firm you apparently work for? Youve been warned about conflict of interest. Undeclared page editing is sufficient cause by itself for deletion of the articles involved. ' DGG ( talk ) 02:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The subject has had a number of Interviews and articles written about him in various regional newspapers, particularly in the 1970s and 1980s, but again more recently. While these aren’t national publications there are quite a number of them, which speaks to notability? In terms of the article coming across as promotional, I was trying to avoid this, in light of my connection to the subject. From your comments, I obviously I didn’t succeed in this. Yes, absolutely, I was paid to write this article. Per Wikipedia’s requirements, I indicated the relationship in the talk page of the draft article as well as my own user page. As I understand it, paid editing is permitted, but the relationship must be made clear.Fbell74 (talk) 03:31, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been created by a paid editor to publicise the company. It is thus an advertisement – it doesn't just read like one, it is one. Wikipedia does not tolerate WP:promotion of any kind, in any space. The previous article on this company was deleted as G11: unambiguous advertising or promotion by Alexf. This probably should be too. WP:Notability is not established here by the plethora of self-published and trivial sources; of the mainstream national sources, the Guardian has a passing mention of the company (for demolishing a local landmark), the Telegraph is in partnership with the company and thus not an independent source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Churchill Retirement Living and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

… is Fbell74. You've been writing it as FBell74 (e.g., here) which doesn't lead anywhere. I've fixed that one, will leave the others to you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:03, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that was my error. Thanks for correcting that one - I've redone the others now Fbell74 (talk) 06:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onyx Moonshine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onyx Moonshine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Wellness Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Wellness Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Churchill Retirement Living, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbell74. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I consider the article basically acceptable, provided that the article on his diagram Illness-Wellness Continuum is redirected to it, so I boldly did that. OK? There are still some unsourced statements in the bio that will need to be fixed. DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DGG. Redirecting is fine - you'd previously suggested deleting the other article and consolidating the information in the John Travis one, so that makes sense. I hadn't thought to do a redirect, so thanks for thinking of that (also for removing one of the alerts). I'll go through the bio information and look to find more sources. By the way, Travis is on the advisory board of the California Institute of Integral Studies. The article currently says that he works with them, but not in which capacity. Would it be overkill to include that? (I have a source). Separately, regarding the COI alert on the main page, is it possible to have this removed, as the contributor connection is made clear on the Talkpage? Fbell74 (talk) 00:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Being on a Board of Directors is not usually considered significant enough, but it's a organization with some relevance to his views, so I wouldn't object. DGG ( talk ) 00:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking along those lines as well - thank you (also for removing the alert). I'll look for the additional sources that you mentioned.Fbell74 (talk) 04:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbell74. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Direct Line for Business".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbell74. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Emmett Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 03:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in Talk:Knowledge café#Merge with World Café (conversational process)?. Yaris678 (talk) 13:55, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Barasingha-drawing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Padraig Marrinan, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.newulsterbiography.co.uk/index.php/home/viewPerson/1127, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Padraig Marrinan and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Padraig Marrinan, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Padraig Marrinan. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Padraig Marrinan with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Padraig Marrinan saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fbell74. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:A-Heroic-Abduction - assemblage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Portrait of George Guillaume by Kris Kuksi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]