User talk:Damate

Have a look at my answer to your question on Talk:Pyrgos.--Hippalus 06:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Fleshing out Minoan civilization category
• Ayia Varvara
• Vitsilia
• Mitropolis
• Plate
• Prophetes Elias
• Ayios Konstantinos Attica vs. Crete?
• Platanos not the bananas ... Platania related or no?
• Larani
• Halasmenos Brock University 2000
• Pelekita
• Ambelos
• Xykephalo
• Nirou Khani Ksanthoudidis
• Chamaizi (Souvloto Mouri) Xanthoudides, Davaras -- k. da-ma-te (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Kommos Shaw
• Kato Syme Lebessi
• Zou Platon
• Atsipades Korakias Alan Peatfield, Christine Morris
• Mameloukou
• tis Ouranias to Froudi cave at Zakros
• Episkopi Sakellarakis cave
• Axos Sakellarakis
• Dia island north of Amnisos... any Minoan evidence? Homeric name for Naxos
• Mohos Sakellarakis sw of Malia
• Krasi Sakellarakis
• Tzermiado Sakellarakis south of Karfi
• Lyttos Sakellarakis cave
• Xydas Sakellarakis
• Kasteli Sakellarakis
• Thrapsano Sakellarakis
• Limenas Hersonisou Sakellarakis
• Skoteino alias for Skotino
• Nirou Hani Sakellarakis north, east of Amnisos, cave
• Myrtia Sakellarakis related to Myrtos?
• Houdetsi Sakellarakis
• Kounavoi Sakellarakis
• Skalani Sakellarakis
• Patsides Sakellarakis .. same as Atsipades?
• Profitis Ilias Sakellarakis
• Aghios Myron Sakellarakis
• Kato Assites Sakellarakis
• Rizinia Sakellarakis cave
• Prinias Sakellarakis
• Gasi Sakellarakis
• Gonies Sakellarakis
• Anogeia Sakellarakis focus on Axos instead
• Aghia Pelagia Sakellarakis north, nw of Iraklio
• Kroussonas Sakellarakis
• Epano Archanes vs. Kato Archanes Sakellarakis
• Kasteli Sakellarakis
• Vitsila Sakellarakis west of Juktas
• Tourkoyeitonia - part of Archanes
• Papadaki - bakery sity at Archanes
• Kassotaki - at Archanes
• Psaltaki - at Archanes
• Vorna at Archanes
• Agora at Archanes
• Kakoskalo Sakellarakis north of Vitsila
• Karydaki Sakellarakis west of Archanes
• Homatolakkos east of Archanes
• Katsoprinia nw of Archanes Sakellarakis
• Sambei west of Archanes Sakellarakis
• Synoikismos west of Archanes Sakellarakis
• Karnari west of Archanes Sakellarakis
• Myristis north of Archanes Sakellarakis
• Xeri Kara se of Archanes Sakellarakis
• Aghios Ioannis MMI Sakellarakis
• Expand Leto

It's a pleasure, and it's nice ot be appreciated! Good work by the way, when we've finished WIkipeida, perhaps we can crack Linear A? Rich Farmbrough. 09:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it, Rose! Damate

It is possible that the name Demeter is derived from the PIE root *dem "house" (Fraenkel) therefore she is the the "mother of the house" (relative greek words: domos,despotis,despoina,damar),but it was rejected by Kretschmer.It's almost certain that the second element means "mother"(Comp.Messapian Damatura).Despoina (clearly interpreted as "mistress of the house") was the goddess of the mysteries of Arcadian cult and a title also given to Persephone.This title is similar to the nameless "mistress of the labyrinth" of the Linear B tablets and today it is given to the mother of god in the Orthodox church ("Panagia Despoina"). It' s possible that Demeter and Despoina,the great Greek goddesses of the Arcadian cult (later Demeter and Persephone) are connected with the Egyptian Isis ("mother" and "mistress of the house of life") and Nepthys ("mistress of the temple" or "mistress of the house") probably with an intermediate link in Knossos (snake goddesses?).I cannot include it in the article because I could be accused for vandalism or for personal research by the Anglo-germanisch experts.Mondigomo (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, Komawenteia was a goddess listed in Linear B. Do you think this word could mean "Party Goddess"? (κόμμα θεά) or "Divine Party"? (κόμμα θεία) But what does βεν mean in Greek? What ever it means it would be in Greek "komma ven thea" and "komma ven theia".--Russianamerican1 (talk) 20:49, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe. However, I'm not entirely convinced ko-ma-we-te-ja is a theonym. The contextual argument isn't bulletproof when you delve into its incidents. The likely related anthroponyms, ko-ma-we, ko-ma-we-ta, ko-ma-we-to and ko-ma-we-te are generally etymologically derived from κόμη 'hair', suggested as relating to "long-haired", by scholars. Do you have a copy of A Companion to Linear B: Mycenaean Greek Texts and their World vol. I from 2008? It has some good information on both the theonym and anthroponyms, including a theory that ko-ma-we-te-ja as a theonym is an epithet meaning "long-haired". k. da-ma-te (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have heared of Komawenteia meaning “long-haired” before, and no I don’t have a copy of A Companion to Linear B: Mycenaean Greek Texts and their World vol. I, but I’ll have to get one.--Russianamerican1 (talk) 19:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, User:Damate! It is I, Ellie K., of Quora, paying a social call. I perused your Linear A & B blog, enjoyed it quite a bit. The post that is currently the first entry of the second page on your blog included a link (about an alphasyllabary?) that led me to a favorite website, that of The OmniGlot. I like The OmniGlot a lot, especially the blog. I based a recent blog post of my own on something seen there. I would like to share it with you. I will do so by other means. On your blog, you wrote about regressive spelling or pronunciation, with a nod of acknowledgement to statistical methods. I enjoyed that, especially because it explained what a tripo is. I have seen that term, or maybe tripos, as a variety of degree for graduates of King's College, Cambridge, and been confused. I'm digging around the somewhat mysterious story of Baron Kahn of the multiplier and Keynesian fame, and noted that he was graduated with that degree in the late 1920's, maybe early 1930's.

I'm sorry. My narrative is the very opposite of linear! I am rushing. Please note that I left a completely unasked for response to your visitor from 2010, regarding Demeter. Feel free to delete any or all of it. Demeter, or Ceres, is my patron avatar, or loa, if I were Hindu or Santeria-observant. And if Demeter/ Ceres were members of the Hindu pantheon or Yoruba/ Haitian/ Voudun, which is not the case! I am here, on English Wikipedia, a fairly recent arrival, and also dabble on Wiktionary and related sister sites, minimally. I've been referred to as the "Whimsical Economist" by kindly souls, but in my official capacity (insert humor, irony, quick grin and shake of my head at the mock pretense), I am known as --FeralOink (talk) 23:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, what is a tripos three-footed degree? -kim. (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a "tripos", there is even a Wikipedia article for you to peruse, -kim. , so that you may better understand! The etymology of the Tripos as an academic credential does allude to "three footed", but as an object, rather than a living being. "An apocryphal legend says that students used to receive one leg of a stool in each of their three years of exams, receiving the whole stool at graduation."--FeralOink (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Surreal Barnstar
		𐁁𐀀𐀷𐀎𐀴𐀣𐀲𐀡𐁊𐀺𐀐𐀹𐀑𐀞𐀂𐀇𐀊𐀁𐁋𐀞𐀲𐀴𐀦𐀫 Thanatos|talk|contributions 01:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why wi-ki-pa-i-di-ja and not wi-ki-pe-di-ja? -kim. (talk) 05:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously because of ἐγκυκλοπαίδεια, encyclopaedia...
PS.Though the barnstar was given to Damate for her to decipher when she would have come back, this, unfortunately, doesn't seem likely any time soon.
So, you deciphered the easy part; how about the rest?! :)
Thanatos|talk|contributions 13:19, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I now realise, it's you. I'm such a fool; your user alias really fooled me. So... you've come back. So, as I've asked you recently elsewhere, on a different medium, care to comment on the present status of the List of Mycenaean deities? Also have you deciphered this? Thanatos|talk|contributions 22:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still having some difficulty deciphering it ... I can't tell if it's intended to be an English transliteration or Greek, and without the space delimiters, it was only the wi-ki-pa-i-di-ja that stuck out for me immediately ... ai-a-wa-(is that supposed to be a ju?)-ti-qa-ta-po-tu-wo-ke-wi-ki-pa-i-di-ja-two-pa-ta-ti-qo-ro. Want to give me a hint on the delimiters? :) -kim. (talk) 04:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As for the List of Mycenaean deities, there are some problems with it right now. :( Too many of them are hapax legomenon and impossible to define with any certainty. I haven't read any academic work on quite a few of the items in the list. I'll try to make some time to do a more thorough line item review, but it might be very intermittent as I still don't have the time I'd like to dedicate to such pursuits ... -kim. (talk) 04:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Damate. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Before creating articles on soldiers please read our notability requirements, in particular WP:SOLDIER. The two articles I tagged for deletion don't meet the notability requirements. Not every soldier is notable and WP is not a memorial to fallen soldiers, see WP:NOTMEMORIAL Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. This is very important and notable to US history because these soldiers are the first black soldiers to serve in the US Army. These are free men and slaves fighting to end slavery in the US. Many suffered as prisoners of war above and beyond white soldiers, which has been documented, and also makes them notable. And, because too many came from slavery, very little is currently available in the vital records about these men, so the many things that are likely notable about them are in an archive somewhere or were never made available because they were deemed property rather than people. I'm happy to accept a stub designation on these, but I don't agree at all that the soldiers of the MA 54th - especially ranked soldiers and soldiers killed in the service - are not "notable." It is rare to even have a photograph of one of these soldiers, and that's something that should be widely shared as the US struggles to tell our black history better. These kind of articles are meaningful and notable to black American identity because of the paucity of any information about black Americans and black soldiers from the American Civil War era. -kim. (talk) 10:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gbawden, please also note that nearly all references from this time period are written by white men and the black soldiers are almost never named in the details. During the American Civil War, the very highest rank a black soldier could attain was Sergeant Major, automatically disqualifying all from several of the WP:SOLDIER criteria. -kim. (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: I just want to let you and -kim know that I (re)created a page for William Tecumseh Barks based on a number of sources. I'm not sure the state of the original page and welcome any additions from anyone. I have have added my 2 cents on -kim's point at the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history, but I wanted to make sure you were both aware of the new version of the Barks page. Smmurphy^(Talk) 17:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Smmurphy! -kim. (talk) 19:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:William Nesbit (Civil Rights Leader), from its old location at User:Damate/William Nesbit (Civil Rights Leader). This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses:, thank you! I was confused about whether it was Ok to move the page before it was reviewed. Question answered. (And heart attack averted; for one second I thought it had been wholesale-deleted without comment. So thank you for updating me here!) -kim. (talk) 04:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete the page. I suppressed the redirect. I just thought you were able to figure out where the draft was without a redirect, and it sounds like you did after a brief startle.

Generally speaking, if you're going to submit a draft for review, you'll may as well do it directly in the draftspace, or else, move it/expect it to be moved. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

William Nesbit (Civil Rights Leader), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating William Nesbit (activist), Damate!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A well-written article and a useful addition to Wikipedia. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:18, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, Damate. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Damate. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]