User talk:Bandwagon98

Hi Bandwagon98! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ab207 (talk) 13:32, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ala Vaikunthapurramuloo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 20:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cameraman Gangatho Rambabu, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Radhe Shyam, you may be blocked from editing.
Please use common/credited names in the infobox; do not add unsourced full names per WP:BLP and WP:V Ab207 (talk) 13:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bandwagon98! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Radhe Shyam several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Radhe Shyam, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Please refrain from adding uncredited names without a valid sources. Ab207 (talk) 08:32, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soori. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using false edit summaries - almost all of your edits state "Fixed grammar", but almost none of them are grammar changes - Arjayay (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at D. V. V. Danayya, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ab207. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pakka Commercial, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Don't add uncredited producers. Only people who are credited under "produced by" should be added Ab207 (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nikamma, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teja (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhairyam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kaduva. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. This notice is regarding this edit. The Doom Patrol (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Legend (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing. While writing reception of films, do not add WP:OR and personal commentaries, also you cannot write your own POV conclusions based on WP:SYNTH of selected reviews. Also, "fixed typo" edit summary is used for fixing minor spelling errors and not for major or disputable changes which would be misleading.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Please do NOT add actors' names in the plot, as you did at Thank You (2022 film), since this is contrary to WP:FILMPLOT "Do not include actors' names in the plot summary" - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 09:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Thank You (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing.
Please don't add your personal opinion as critical summary. Always provide reliable sources Diff: [1] Ab207 (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pushpa: The Rise.
Don't add /change anything without sources; avoid your personal commentary. Diff: [2] Ab207 (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bandwagon98, Plot summaries should be between 400 and 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT. Re this edit, the hidden note clearly indicates that the word count is already 691, yet you went ahead added additional details, forcing other editors to clean it up again. Please listen to the concern of fellow editors and act accordingly. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 14:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Bandwagon98. These additions to the plot are exceeding the 700-word limit by a margin. Please don't exceed the limit by adding unnecessary details and force other editors to revert your additions to maintain the word limit.

Also, please leave accurate edit summaries like 'expanded plot' in this case instead of misleading ones like Fixed typo/Fixed grammar. Thanks. -- Ab207 (talk) 12:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dhamaka (2022 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 01:45, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dhamaka (2022 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 23:07, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cobra (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 21:37, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frozen (2007 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yashpal Sharma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J. P. Dutta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarhad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vamsy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arunachalam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please remove the full name of Suhas from the cast as it is sensitive information. This would spoil the experience for many. Thank you Dcrajula (talk) 03:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anek. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits.

Many of your edit summaries say "Fixed typo" for edits that not fixing typographical errors. This is misleading. Please ensure your edit summaries are fair and accurate summaries of the edits performed. Thank you.

— Archer1234 (talk) 01:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Project K (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ab207 (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bandwagon98, Please do not revert the change in the filmography section of cinematographer Karthik Palani. It is listed as per the principal photography of the films. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Language columns on pages such as Allari Naresh, Vijay Devarakonda, Naga Chaitanya are not neccesary in my view because almost all of their films are Telugu. @Kailash29792: @Ab207: Any thoughts? DareshMohan (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at The Last of Us (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. CastJared (talk) 08:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tanhaji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jagat Singh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bandwagon98! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ajith Kumar that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Archer1234 (t·c) 14:34, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chirantan Das

added a link pointing to Sanam Teri Kasam

Excel Entertainment

added a link pointing to Best Supporting Actress

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vadh (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MLA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are pretty disruptive if you could first gather what you want to edit, consolidate everything and then make a change. In that way, we will also be able to verify your work, instead jumping from multiple commits. You could also use Wikipedia's Sandbox feature to try out your edits to see the visual result then you can transfer that edit to the desired page. Aadirulez8 (talk) 05:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ashta Chamma, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bandwagon98! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Dasara (film) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 12:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bandwagon98. I have noticed that in your edits that your edit summaries, when you do provide them (which appears to be rare), are frequently misleading (stating a reason that did not accurately describe your actual edit) or vague to the point of being functionally equivalent to providing no summary at all.

For example, your recent edits to Chatrapathi (2023 film) included these:

• [3] – no edit summary provided, but an unsourced claim was made
• [4] – edit summary "Added links" that did a lot more than just add links. It added a substantial element to the infobox. This is a misleading edit summary.
• [5] – edit summary "Added links" that did a lot more than just add links. It changed the prose. This is a misleading edit summary.
• [6] – edit summary "Added links" that did a lot more than just add links. It added cast members without citing published reliable source(s) to verify them. This is a misleading edit summary.

Here is what Help:Edit summary states (among other things):

• Avoid misleading summaries. Mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important. You could add something like "and misc." to cover the other changes.
• Avoid vagueness. While edit summaries can be terse, they should still be specific. Providing an edit summary similar to "I made some changes" is functionally equivalent to not providing a summary at all.

Please do better. If you need help on who to write a good edit summary, see WP:EDITSUMCITE.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chatrapathi (2023 film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 22:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bandwagon98. There are several editors persistently changing the cast list at Agent (film) and it is difficult to get agreement when changes are being made repeatedly. We could use your help. I am inviting you to participate in the discussion at Talk:Agent (film)#Cast section: seeking consensus. I would like to hear your thoughts on what the cast listing should and should not include and why. Will you join the conversation?  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bandwagon98. Regarding your recent edit to Agent (film) where you made changes to the cast list, note that the "Cast" section is disputed and a discussion topic has been started to seek consensus. I, ask that you not make any changes to the Cast section until we can reach consensus on the talk page. Since you have interest in this article and in that section, in particular, your participation in the talk page discussion would be most welcome. Thank you.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 19:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again @Bandwagon98. Your recent edit to the "Cast" section of Agent (film) appears to be ignoring the situation that the section is in dispute and that we are seeking to get consensus on the talk page for what the section should contain and say. Are you going to ignore the discussion at Talk:Agent_(film)#Cast_section:_seeking_consensus? I would prefer to collaborate with you, but, obviously, cannot compel you to do so. However, if you continue to make edits when you know the section is contentious, then I will raise the issue at an administrator's noticeboard for their help and disposition. Administrator actions could possibly include full or partial blocking of your account. Won't you, instead, join in the discussion? Thanks.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 21:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yuvan Pradeep yuvan (talk) 03:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Aanand L. Rai, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

The edits were contrary to the cited source. They did not cite published reliable source(s) to verify the claims made. Again, you used a misleading edit summary.

 — Archer1234 (t·c) 23:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Herald. I noticed that you recently removed content from Interstellar (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:37, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Bandwagon98, you recently changed a film title on the Sreeleela page from Extra Ordinary Man, which is the way it appears in other articles and in images, and you added a hyphen. I reverted you, asking "why?" in my edit summary. You proceeded to reinsert the hyphen, disregarding my revert and the fact that the hyphen is inappropriate, and as usual, you didn't bother offering an explanation for your edit. Please explain your behaviour, which appears to be disruptive. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:05, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Ghoomer, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Millows! | 🪧 04:51, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why ru adding brackets for no articles. Fostera12 (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 69th National Film Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smile Please.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pallavi Joshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adalat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Game Changer (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 21:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shah Rukh Khan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Your changes have been reverted time and again by multiple users. Use Talk:Shah Rukh Khan#Lead changes to make a case for your changes instead of edit-warring. FrB.TG (talk) 17:07, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satyaprem Ki Katha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garba.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Apaharan

added a link pointing to Superintendent

Kaala (TV series)

added a link pointing to Intelligence Bureau

Siva Ananth

added a link pointing to Intelligence Bureau

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apaharan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superintendent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was not a "grammar fix"; rather, "huge" adds an element of WP:POV to the sentence. Please stop edit-warring here. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:17, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tiger 3, you may be blocked from editing. Edit-warring, not following cited refs/MOS, and not using edit-summaries, are all examples of your disruptive behavior. DMacks (talk) 21:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ravi K. Chandran, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear Bandwagon98, The release date of Dunki was officially changed but you removed my edit. Kindly check this poster [ https://twitter.com/iamsrk/status/1726926047160185155] PQR01 (talk) 13:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I was trying to remove the budget of the film, since it was uncredited without a source. Bandwagon98 (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh, it's okay, can you revert? PQR01 (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RangersRus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Please either include a citation or revert back your changes to previous revision. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 21:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Sainik School, Korukonda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korukonda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please add contents to Draft:Hanu Man (soundtrack) and move to mainspace. 2409:4073:2186:EE35:0:0:2412:10A5 (talk) 06:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Ranbir Kapoor. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avantika Vandanapu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union City.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nandha Periyasamy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mahesh Babu, you may be blocked from editing.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 05:44, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Heeramandi.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 21:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been messing with genres on Guntur Kaaram even though the sources clearly state action-drama. Stop this ASAP. 77Survivor (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Article 370 (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page J&K.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karan B. Rawat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shikari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Yuva (2024 film). In addition to the soundtrack NOT being sourced, it was removed based on being a COATrack. Please see edit summaries as this was already reverted previously. Use talk page if you feel it meets inclusion criteria. CNMall41 (talk) 04:20, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nani filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY: we do not add future film projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.

 — Archer1234 (t·c) 06:17, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bandwagon98, This is a friendly advice. I had come to your user talk page to make a different help request, but ended up being surprised that you know at least user talk page discussion procedure and still you seem to be ignoring important notices by other users. Yours is a 2 years old account with over 10k edits and ignoring notices by other users may not be helpful. You need to engage in discussions and address the issues where other users are concerned about your edits.

Bookku (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Varshangalkku Shesham. Once again, you are adding unsourced OR to movie reviews. Nowhere in the citation you provided had the terms positive reviews or similar texts. Please be extra careful not to use WP:OR or WP:SYNTH. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Niketh Bommireddy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. WP:FILMOGRAPHY: Do not add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:32, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dange (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siddharth Menon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @Bandwagon98

Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across your user profile (from article history Dinesh Vijan) .

Requesting your visit to My Choice (2015 film) (still a draft in my userspace) and help expand the topic areas if you find topic interesting. Wish you very happy Wikipedia editing.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sabu Cyril, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

At what timestamp was this name mentioned in Por? DareshMohan (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are all of your edits marked with the summary #article-section-source-editor? DareshMohan (talk) 05:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Santhana Krishnan Ravichandran, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Santhosh Narayanan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Numbers. Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words. DareshMohan (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bandwagon redid their edit [7] from [8] depsite my change. What should I do? 🤔 @Kailash29792: DareshMohan (talk) 16:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have my permission to undo the edit, and cite the above link in your edit summary. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:01, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, see my TP and the exceptions in the guideline; I think that numbers might be acceptable (and I sometimes see them; and use them myself (I may be wrong)). Better not start an edit war over this, I'd say. Have a look: Joker_(2019_film)#Critical_response for example. I had seen other GAs with numbers but cannot locate them anymore! Still, the precise sentence you are linking is a bit different, not just the mention of a XX/XX out of rating, but a sentence with a verb (he gave the film ...), so maybe different (and maybe more a case for letters), as it is the case in the following FA Jaws_(film)#Critical_reception or that A-article Rang_De_Basanti#Critical_reception, or in the GA Bethune: The Making of a Hero, and Angel_Heart.... Mushy Yank (talk) 17:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yash Raj Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]