User talk:Ajith008

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mammootty filmography because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dewritech (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajinikanth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Why are you making unnecessary changes to Good Article. ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 18:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Brothers (film)‎‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed.
Anish Viswa 14:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Arivaal Chuttika Nakshatram, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 07:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leela (2013 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leela (2013 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ushau97 ^{talk contribs} 09:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ajith008,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Godman for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cmckain14 (talk) 02:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ajith008,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Gangster (film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Cmckain14 (talk) 02:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lingusamy's Untitled Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingusamy's Untitled Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 07:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]