User talk:Ouro

Talk archives
October 2005 - December 2007

I guess they should probably be merged, but I'm not sure which title we should use, as they are subtly different concepts. Perhaps the apropriate course of action would be to seek wider input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disaster management‎? Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Yes, then, definitly requires broader input. A monsterous new year to you as well! ;-) Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I doubt anyone will attempt to rescue it but rules is rules! If you need any help with anything on here just let me know. Cheers, Mallanox 16:46, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I read the article and this is what I have to say about it:

• It's indeed written like a resume. Actually, it appears to be a full length CV
• I could see some basic notability (a bunch of television appearances, discussions of his work on Greek and Italian television, etc) but, totally unreferenced
• The article title is after the person's last name and does not follow the normal naming conventions for biographies of people

I'll be posting a PROD on the article --Kimon^talk 14:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm unsure how to send messages to individuals on here, so you'll have to please forgive me if I'm going to wrong way about it.

I understand your reasons for deciding to not split Erection up completely. However, the reason I thought it worth splitting it up was that the clitoral and nipple erections seemed lost at the bottom of the page and dwarfed by the overriding initial interpretation of the word erection being penile. In addition to this, they are all quite distinct variations of erection. Casdious ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The version of the article Chris Llewellyn you prodded, was heavily vandalized. I would think it's smart to check if something like that is the problem when you think of prodding something. I have reverted, and then also deprodded.Greswik (talk) 22:29, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(moved barnstar to user page)

Are you going for 4k?--ROGER DAVIES ^talk 11:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, think you interested in the issue. I propose adding it here--Seyyed(t-c) 18:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was demonstrating how some of the commercials are presented. 65.163.113.170 (talk) 09:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just learned that a rogue satellite will hit Earth on Feb. 29-30. Satellite lost power, propulsion. No one knows where it will hit. Can you look into this ? IF it hits ME and mine, NASA had better have a hell of a check ready for me. (pain and suffering, property damage, medical bills, that kind of thing) 65.163.113.170 (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Had a typo. 65.163.113.170 (talk) 11:04, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		My RfA
		Thank you very much, Ouro, for your support in my RfA which I really appreciate. It closed at 83/0/0. I was surprised by the unanimity and will do my best to live up to the new role. All the best, --ROGER DAVIES talk 16:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply] The patio at the Partal Palace in the Alhambra, Andalucia.

Yeah, I think it had just crossed the line from off-topic banter to mudslinging. I can see someone feeling the need to resurrect it though... J Milburn (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you back and thanks for the support. The photo of your desk looks very much like mine. (Must tidy it.) --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 09:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You guys have a desk? I gotta upgrade. I only have a lap. Leobold1 (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least it's not about his soap operas (I don't think), so I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. Not that I actually expect any clarification. — Lomn 14:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.: Thank you! :.

Thank you for participating in my 2nd RfA and supporting me! My RfA passed unanimously at 79 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral. I would like to take this opportunity to thank AndonicO and Rudget for nominating me. I also want to thank LaraLove for persuading me to keep going after I failed my first RfA. To be really honest, I am surprised that my RfA passed without any oppose or neutral. Being an administrator means more responsibilities, especially when I'm now an administrator on both English Wikipedia as well as WikiSpecies. I promise everyone that I will use the tools effectively to serve the community. If you need help on anything, don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page and I will get back to you as soon as possible. Last but not least, remember the motto for Ohana: "When it comes to family, nobody gets left behind." Once again, thanks for placing your trust in me to help the community. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

		Milhist Coordinator elections
		Thank you very much for your support in the recent Military history Wikiproject elections. I went into it expecting to just keep my seat and was astonished to end up with the lead role. I anticipate a rather busy six months :) --ROGER DAVIES talk 13:41, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply] Haut-Koeningsbourg castle, Alsace.

Ouro: I wish to thank you for your support in my unsuccessful bid at becoming an Assistant Coordinator for the Military history WikiProject. Rest assured that I will still be around, probably even more than before, and I have the utmost confidence in the abilities of the current and new coordinators. I might also mention that I am already planning on running again in August. As always, if you need anything, just get in touch. -MBK₀₀₄ 21:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As for the header on my talk page, which one, the nav bar? Or the one telling you what to do? I'm kidding, sure you can use it, just link back to my talk page. I took the formatting from User talk:TomStar81 but have made my own improvements. -MBK₀₀₄ 03:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't need to ask to use Image:Yakyakyak.gif. Because it is licensed CC-SA, you only need to state that User:Mailer Diablo created it. -MBK₀₀₄ 17:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am feeling better, mobility in both my hand and leg are back above 95%. Unfoturently, though, I am still working overtime to get back on top of school work. I am struggling to cope with my legendary procrastination, which isn't helping me any; I may end up taking a leave of wiki-absence for a few days to catch up entirely. I can't afford to fail any classes this semester, my gpa skidded from 2.8 to 2.2 last semester; if it gets below 2.0 I'll end up back on acedemic probation and be forced to sit teh next semester out :-/ TomStar81 (Talk) 08:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I invite you to particpate in our new assessment drive? It's strictly for experienced wiki-gnomes and has a degree of friendly competition built-in. It involves re-evaluating around 3500 Milhist B-Class articles to ensure they match our new criteria. As ever, we're offering a range of awards as our way of expressing our thanks. The drive doesn't start until 18:00 (UTC) on March 10 but you can sign up in advance here. It would be great if you can spare the time, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 05:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One Stripe (200 articles) Two Stripes (400 articles) Three Stripes (600 articles) Chevrons (1000 articles) Golden Wiki First place

thankx dear for your kind suggestion, it will not affect on me cuz iam not great wikipian so no will call me or mail me , thankx for your graetness

Mangrio 04:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Milhist's new drive – Tag & Assess 2008 – goes live on April 25 and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance, here. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 13:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One Stripe (200 articles) Two Stripes (400 articles) Three Stripes (600 articles) Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles) Chevrons (2000 articles) Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles) Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles) Third place overall Second place overall First place overall

Many thanks for the invitation, and nice to hear from you again. However at this time I am going to be doing a bit of travelling around (first going to meet my girlfriend's family across Poland, but generally in the vicinity of Bielsko-Biała, and next weekend we're hitch hiking from Gdańsk to Munich), so it's going to be busy. However, I have just noticed that the drive is going to be long - so I'll be hoping to find time later to participate. I've generally been very busy in March and April, new place, new people, and the Misses :) you probably know how it is. But thanks for the heads up. Hope everything's fine with you. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 13:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hllo, you seem to have missed, as somebody before you as well, the software also nominated that isn't eligible for Speedy deletion and the reason I listed this at AfD in the first place. Please undo your closure.--Tikiwont (talk) 08:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That somebody takes a careful look at the discussion and deletes the also nominated JiraBuddy as well.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and sorry if above sounded edgy, but I am actually trying to have break. Being doubly careful once someone questions any closure of yours is recommend, though. For my side, i'll try to highlight the bundling better in future noms. Cheers--Tikiwont (talk) 09:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Labrador x golden retriever. Don't forget to place {{subst:at}} above the title of the AfD instead of below it. Keep up the good work! DARTH PANDA^duel 21:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, we all have our firsts. I'm pretty sure I did the same thing as you the first time for me. DARTH PANDA^duel 21:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Benedykta Mackieło is really good just short. Can you write someting to the article???? --Tamás Kádár (talk) 18:24, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeap. The article is better now. --Tamás Kádár (talk) 14:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think we could remove the notability tag now?

Yes. --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying to my question about Kraków. You said there are storage lockers at Kraków railway station, which is good. I hope they are big enough, as my backpack is the kind that hitch-hikers use and not exactly one that a schoolchild would use on a school day. I'm prepared to spend even more than 100 zlotych (is that how you spell it?) if it means I can put my backpack in a safe place for ten hours.

Now my other question is, what is the best way of getting around in Kraków? When I was in Prague, I found the Prague Metro very easy to use, and only ever used it. But Kraków doesn't have a metro, it only has trams and buses. I have bought a tourist guide to Kraków, and it has an overall map of the tram and bus lines, but it does not have nearly all of the stops marked and named, and not even all individual streets. Is there some sort of well-detailed map of the Kraków tram and bus lines available?

I haven't even booked a hotel yet, but I have to do so quite soon. I'm hoping to find one quite near the centre. Booking.com offers some hotels not exactly in the centre, but a bit further away, for 400 zlotych for two nights. That's less than what I paid for a single hotel night in the centre of Berlin, so I can live with that price. Can I somehow see on the maps that Booking.com offers if the hotel is in within reach of the tram lines?

I wish I could have replied to you in Polish, but I do not understand any Polish. JIP | Talk 19:01, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jip. I must say I am very happy that you are so interested in Poland and Kraków, actually my favourite city.

Well, the storage lockers are big (there are many of them), although I must say I just usually left the luggage with the storage people (they are marked with a large luggage icon or the term 'Przechowalnia bagażu' in Polish. Young people in Kraków usually speak English well, so there will surely be someone there to help you. The storage should not cost you in excess of 10 Złotys (Złotys is the nominative plural I'd say). 100 will get you safely through the day including bus and tram fare for the whole day, a decent meal and even souvenirs.

The best and easiest way to get around Kraków, if you are there just for one day, is on foot. Really, I'm not jesting. Almost everything is close by, the centre of the town is within 10 minutes walking distance, and Kazimierz is another 20 minutes away of a picturesque walk around the streets. If you want, the tram and bus line maps are here, unfortunately only in Polish. As far as I see, the website of the city company operating the trams and buses is in Polish only. Trams will definitely be enough for you to get around, they are fast, modern and run around all of the centre. A day pass costs 10,40 for an adult and will let you ride all trams and buses for 24 hours from the time you stamp it (stamp the ticket directly after entering the bus or tram for the first time, and then keep it on you until it expires).

I have never used booking.com, but if you tell me what standard you are looking for, I will be happy to assist you in finding a place to sleep in Kraków. The city offers a wide variety of backpacker-friendly hostels and hotels in the centre which will let you sleep for under PLN 100 per night easily. PLN 400 for two nights is a lot.

Hope I helped you a bit. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 19:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just booked a hotel in the centre of Kraków, only a bit more than 1 km from the railway station. It will cost me 180 PLN for two nights. The room is otherwise OK but it doesn't have a private toilet. I think I can live with that, I've had previous experience with hotel rooms without private toilets. I should be all OK if I don't try to venture very far away from the centre. Now I should have everything else settled except what I'm actually going to see in Kraków. I will have to consult that tourist guide I bought. Thanks again for your help. JIP | Talk 20:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Ouro, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Ouro/euro2012. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have every respect for your use of language and I am delighted that you used this word in its original meaning. I was intending to confirm what you had said, not denigrate you in any way. My apologies if you took it that way. Best to you. Richard Avery (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:B Puzzle colours.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chewbacca told me you could use a kitten or two. Here you go. I love Kraków BTW.

Von Restorff (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind re-assessing Dandridge McRae? Thanks! Aleutian06 (talk) 02:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ouro!!! :) ZelDelet 10:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.160.216.133 (talk)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ouro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ouro. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted a suggestion and a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of the Bible. The Transhumanist 20:37, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ouro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ouro. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2020 Polish protests, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 16:46, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that a message you recently left to a newcomer may have been unduly harsh. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see others making a common mistake, consider politely pointing out what they did wrong and showing them how to correct it. It takes more time, but it helps us retain new editors. Thank you. - Knightoftheswords281 (Talk · Contribs) 13:10, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Zsolt Palotai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 07:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JM (talk) 11:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:MINOR. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 11:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 11:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 11:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Heidegger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tautology. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zsolt Palotai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 17:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:

• Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
• Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
• Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
• Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
• Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
• Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
• Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
• Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
• Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
• Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
• Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
• Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
• Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
• Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
• Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
• Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
• Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.

To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everyday People (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Variety and David Rooney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

• Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
• Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
• Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
• Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
• Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
• Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
• Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
• Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]