User talk:Nshuks7

---

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nicely with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Rockpocket 00:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Arthur Berriedale Keith article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Rockpocket 00:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Eclerx, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Toddstreat1 23:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I was not involved in the recent speedy deletion of eClerx. I did delete a redirect at that name last year, but that was quite some time before your re-creation. IceKarmaॐ 10:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, it is usual practice for an administrator not involved in the deletion discussion to close the discussion and, if consensus is to delete, ultimately delete the article. That's what happened yesterday with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eclerx. —C.Fred (talk) 18:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about the fact that all but one comment on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Eclerx were made before I cited multiple external sources and made some significant changes to the article? It's really frustrating to have your work deleted without much thought.Nshuks7 19:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Which was never mentioned in the AfD discussion. (Tangent: only one source is independent.) Since the only discussion at the AfD was delete, I don't blame the closing admin for not looking closely at the article. If you'd like, I can restore the article into your user space tonight (EDT, GMT-4) so you can work on it further, but before it goes back into main article space, either some drastic changes in the company's notability need to happen, or it needs to go through deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely you can participate in the deletion review discussion. Presumably you'd probably open the case, and then might need to respond to concerns raised by other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 03:28, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the article is in userspace now at User:Nshuks7/Eclerx —C.Fred (talk) 03:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jim Wadia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 00:23, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD votes typically last five days. If you can significantly improve the article, or address concerns brought up, the closing admin will typically evaluate the changes, so if you end up seeing several delete !votes, don't feel discouraged and stop trying to improve the article. The more sourced information you can add, the better chance it will stand. Regards, Resolute 00:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest a personal section would be useful, provided it can be attributed to reliable sources. It looks a lot better, but as with most Wikipedia articles, more is better. I would suggest looking up other CEO biographies for ideas on how to further improve the article. Regards, Resolute 02:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Jim Wadia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Wadia. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 01:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you signed up for the Finance Project. Welcome! Please let me know if I (or the project) can help you in any way. It's fairly low key, and I do hope we get beyond templates. Smallbones (talk) 22:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bailey Coates Cromwell

Thank you for your contributions there and I have also noticed your contributions to wiki concerning systematic risks. As I have been designing trading and risk management systems for 17 years I have introduced substantial systematic risks; the question is how you quantify and hedge against such risks. Regards, --Malin Randstrom (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Indian Express Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. FlyingToaster 08:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend applying an {{undercontruction}} tag to the article. That way, editors will know that you're not finished and will give you time to complete some edits before evaluating the subject of the article. FlyingToaster 09:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a Devanagari editor, that is the only reason for the image to be there. Please go ahead and convert the image into text. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 09:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

वेद प्रामाण्य कस्य चित् कर्त्रवादः स्नाने धर्मेच्छा जातिवादाव लेपः| संतापारंभः पापहानाय चेति ध्वस्तप्रज्ञानाम पञ्च लिन्गानि जाड्ये||

The bold sections need correction. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 10:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

वेद प्रामाण्यं कस्य चित् कर्तृवादः स्नाने धर्मेच्छा जातिवादाव लेपः| संतापारंभः पापहानाय चेति ध्वस्तप्रज्ञानां पञ्च लिङगानि जाड्ये|| How does one activate the Devnagari keyboard? 117.195.17.87 (talk) 10:57, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nshuks7. You have new messages at Cerejota's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cerejota (talk) 07:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nshuks,

Thanks for your reasons for the removal of the link. Unfortunately we do not have even a single external link to a good website in History of India wiki page. I am a lecturer of arts and am new to editing articles on wikipedia. All the history of india pages which I have surfed through on the internet are full of ads and scattered articles. This was the only page where I found the material well organized. And I struck upon this page only through wikipedia.

I am not aware of wiki rules and policies which make a link eligible to be listed in the external links section but am definitely of the opinion that the volume and the material presented on the site are huge and well presented and would be of great help to the readers.

Also it would be great if we can have such URLs in the external links which meet the standards set by wikipedia and is also informative. Unfortunately we do not have even a single good link.

Thanks, Sneha —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneha.desai (talk • contribs) 13:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it necessary to keep the bits on poverty etc. in the intro of the page (the article on India)?? Steed Asprey - 171 (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steed Asprey - 171 (talk • contribs) [reply]

If you could take a look here and voice your concerns then it would be help select a suitable title for the article. Regards, JSR 0562 07:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have sought some citations on L K Advani page. Please add the references if you have them or else let me know if I can delete the lines. Thanks nihar (talk) 12:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Most of the edits are just copyediting. There's hardly any info I have added to the article. I hope I find time to later go through the article again for the purpose of adding citations. --Just my 2 cents -- Hemanshu (talk) 07:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nshuks, Let me be plain: From what I have seen so far, you are an enthusiastic editor who can be an asset on wikipedia, but currently you lack good judgment about what are quality sources, and what is encyclopedic writing. If you are interested in improving those aspects of your editing (which are of use on wikipedia as well as in academic, professional writing), I will be happy to be of help as in the two sections on Talk:Romila Thapar. If instead, you wish to continue edit-warring on a BLP, making poor quality edits, and snarky misguided comments I can spend my time more usefully elsewhere, and simply revert and post warning template when you err. Let me know if you prefer the former approach or if you look at this as an adversarial relationship, and would prefer me not to offer unwanted (and unheeded) advice.

As you are perhaps aware, you are under no obligation to trust my judgment of sources, neutral phrasing, or interpretation of wikipedia policies and can use the various related noticeboards (WP:RSN, WP:POVN, WP:BLPN etc) to get second opinion. Cheers Abecedare (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that you are on the verge on violating WP:3RR on Romila Thapar. Any further reverts will likely lead to blocks. Please discuss on talk page, or use one of the noticeboards listed above to get an outside opinion. Abecedare (talk) 23:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the topic of Romila Thapar, I have seen very little constructive criticism coming in from editors who were already present. If you scroll up from the latest section on the talk page, most of my questions were left hanging there. Editors who had reverted my edits did not care to explain why, for example, Praful Bidwai is more notable/correct than Arun Shourie? Why criticisms cannot be placed on Thapar's bio? Why does the article/editors don't accept any changes to the body? And so on.

Also, in the present context of the "marxist" tag, I have not received any logical explanations as to why the references I have given are not valid. See you on the talk page. Nshuks7 (talk) 23:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC) copied from my talkpage, to keep discussion consolidated. Abecedare (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have not participated or read the Shourie vs Bidwai discussion so cannot comment on it at the moment. If you are interested in reopening that question, start a new section on the talk page, and ping the editors previously involved.

As for the marxist tag: Firstly note that Sreedharan is not criticizing, but rather prasing, Thapar's scholarship. But irrespective of that, simply tagging the historians as "marxist" is inappropriate for reasons I have already explained on the talk page.

PS: I have this page watchlisted now, so we can keep the conversation in one place; of course article specific issues are better discussed at Talk:Romila Thapar, and I posted the posted the above message here since it concerned your conduct rather than article content. Abecedare (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, just for clarification, if you have reverted thrice — once for MrinaliniB and twice for me — doesn't that mean you are already over your 3 reverts/day limit too? I guess such technicalities should matter. Secondly, by WP:3RR definition, I am editing and you are reverting. Thirdly, shouldn't WP:WikiBullying#Making "no-edit" orders apply here? Nshuks7 (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC) copied from my talkpage, to keep discussion consolidated. Abecedare (talk) 23:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]

• WP:3RR does not say that you are editing and I am reverting. It says, "A revert is any action, including administrative actions, that reverses the actions of other editors, in whole or in part." and both of us have reverted by that definition.
• But no, I have not run afoul of 3RR: see the BLP exemption to understand why. You have not contravened 3rr either, yet.

Of course, if interested, you can get a second opinion on the above points. Abecedare (talk) 23:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To set us authomatic archiving, just add the following code on your talk page

{{User:MiszaBot/config |maxarchivesize = 80K |counter = 1 |algo = old(4d) |archive = User talk:Nshuks/Archive %(counter)d }}

See User:MiszaBot/Archive_HowTo for further explanation of the parameters. Abecedare (talk) 23:48, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And you can use the {{Archive box}} template to create links to the archived pages. Abecedare (talk) 23:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the compliment for UP map. Saw ur comment just now(I expect such messages at my talk page also, that helps).--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 11:06, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you reverted my edits on the Lavasa article for discussion. I've posted for discussion on the talk page. How long do you think is acceptable to wait before changing it back to my version? Fleetham (talk) 04:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apropos of Samar Chatterjee, I sympathize with your wish to save the article (I have worked to save other articles myself), but everything really depends on finding independent sources in the media confirming his notability. Articles are routinely deleted of professors, journalists and writers who have authored many articles but have no independent sources confirming they are notable. See WP:PROF which says, "The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." So far, I haven't found anything in the Indian or US media mentioning Dr. Chatterjee. Jonathanwallace (talk) 18:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't like how you are treating my edits to the Lavasa page. I make an edit, then you revert it. And you say things like I am making "aggrandizing" edits. I don't understand. Can we please discuss this instead of you telling me what is and what isn't acceptable? Please read WP:OWN.

I don't want to write an advertisement. I do want to be able to contribute to the page, but I can't because you always revert my edits and make excuses I can't understand. I'm not happy how you are treating me. Fleetham (talk) 01:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I could find no mention of an airstrip in the citation you provided in Shahid Balwa. Please familiarize yourself with the biographies of living persons guideline. Material added to Wikipedia concerning living persons must be carefully sourced. — Brianhe (talk) 16:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, are you editing the Lavasa page anymore? Because there has not been much activity. If you are not participating I will go ahead and put my version of the history section up. But I would really like you to participate! Fleetham (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to know if you were still actively contributing to the Lavasa page. I've held off making changes because I want to get your agreement to them, but you haven't edited the page or posted on the discussion in a while. I don't know if you're still interested in the article. Please let me know! Fleetham (talk) 14:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and make changes to the Lavasa page. You seemed interested in helping out with that article before, so if you're still interested please come back! Fleetham (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 15:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a token of appreciation for your good work

WBRSin (talk) 12:36, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arrow-Lind principle.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paranjoy Guha Thakurta.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 13:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nshuks7. You have new messages at Mrt3366's talk page.
Message added 15:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 15:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nshuks7. You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:25, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arrow-Lind principle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arrow-Lind principle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 11:54, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nshuks7. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Paranjoy Guha Thakurta".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paranjoy Guha Thakurta}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 03:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nshuks7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Im currently rebuilding the WikiProject Investment.

Since your a member of the project/were one I wanted to ask if you were interested in helping me re-start the project.

I already am pretty much finished with updating the project page.Take a look at it. Ping me if you want to help! Thanks. WikiEditCrunch (talk) WikiEditCrunch (talk) 22:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

Hello, Nshuks7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nshuks7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samar Chatterje, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]