User talk:Mad Man American
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Mad Man American, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
AustralianRupert (talk) 04:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Re: What gives?
[edit]I've been signed up for a few weeks now but I still can't move/rename/retitle any articles. How come? Mad Man American (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- You now also have to have edited 10 times before being able to move pages. I know, it's silly... blame the administrators who decided it was a good idea. Gurch (talk) 16:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Requests for assessment
[edit]Hello, why are you nominating all those articles you haven't worked on for other editors to assess at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests? If you haven't worked on the articles you can assess them yourself. Nick-D (talk) 10:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
- Can you please stop nominating articles you haven't worked on for assessment? I'd be happy to give you some pointers if you'd like to assess them yourself. Cheers, Nick-D (talk) 10:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I've just removed the long list of articles you requested assessments for here. That page is really intended as a quick way for editors to receive an assessment of an article they've improved. As you don't appear to have worked on any of those articles, it would be best if you just reviewed them yourself - the instructions for this is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/B-Class FAQ Nick-D (talk) 23:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
[edit]| Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help!
Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1801 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention. 
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver. We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, |
AFC Backlog
[edit]Articles for Creation urgently needs YOUR help!
 Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1801 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial. |
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1801 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
News
|
Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation. If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.
Happy reviewing! TheSpecialUser TSU
- Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 09:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject:Articles for Creation October - November 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive
[edit]
WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 22, 2012 – November 21, 2012.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
EdwardsBot (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1801 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
|
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wikiproject Articles for creation Needs You!
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1st, 2013 – March 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 13:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
WikiProject AFC needs your help... again
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from July 1st, 2013 – July 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
A new version of our AfC helper script is released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code cleanup, and more page cleanups. If you want to see a full list of changes, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Helper script/Development page. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks.
Delivered at 12:56, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC
October 2013 AFC Backlog elimination drive
[edit]WikiProject AFC is holding a one month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from October 1st, 2013 – October 31st, 2013.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:21, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]
Mad Man American (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet of Wild Wolf. Mad Man American (talk) 13:54, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser evidence shows otherwise. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
[edit]Hello Mad Man American:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 1800 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Unblock
[edit]Mad Man American (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet of Wild Wolf. From what I understand from Wikipedia policy, I can only be blocked for doing something wrong, such as repeatedly vandalism articles. Since I have not done so, then I can continue editing. Mad Man American (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No, you cannot. First, there are only very limited exceptions to the "one person, one account" rule, and block evasion is not one of them - it is, in fact, "doing something wrong", as there is clear and obvious evidence that you are, in fact, Wild Wolf - "I am not a sock" is not going to cut it here.. In addition, this account has supported Wild Wolf on multiple occasions in the past in discussions - using sockpuppets to vote-stack is decidedly "doing something wrong". In short: this account is going to remain blocked, you need to take to heart why your behavior was wrong and got you blocked, you need to take the WP:STANDARDOFFER, and then you need to request an unblock at your original account. The Bushranger One ping only 01:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Since a Checkuser has stated that there is technical evidence linking this account with Wild Wolf, you're going to need to explain what your connection with that account is, as we block gimmick accounts of blocked users on sight. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- The fact that I supported Wild Wolf is not proof that I am a sockpuppet of him, it merely means that I agreed with him. Also, I don't see how asking for an unblock on Wild Wolf's account will get my account unblocked. Unless you can show how my edits constitute vandalism, then I should probably continue editing Wikipedia. Mad Man American (talk) 14:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
- The overwhelming evidence is that you and WW are the same person. "I am not a sock" - again - is not sufficient for you to be unblocked. Vandalism is not the only reason you can be blocked - it's extremely obvious that this is block evasion. "The fact you supported" is not proof - because it is not needed as proof. What it is is evidence that not only is there sockpuppetry here, but that the sockpuppetry is being used for votestacking, an even worse thing. TL;DR - unless you can provide a very convincing explanation as to how you and WW are not the same person, you're going to stay blocked. - The Bushranger One ping only 00:28, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- The fact that I supported Wild Wolf is not proof that I am a sockpuppet of him, it merely means that I agreed with him. Also, I don't see how asking for an unblock on Wild Wolf's account will get my account unblocked. Unless you can show how my edits constitute vandalism, then I should probably continue editing Wikipedia. Mad Man American (talk) 14:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)