Talk:Women's rights in Brazil
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Women's rights in Brazil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Women in Brazil was copied or moved into Women's rights in Brazil with this edit on 12:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC). The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Citation style
[edit]A quick note about citation styles. When you cite the same source multiple times, you can use the <ref> tags to simplify your job. This also makes the citation list easier to sort through.
Here's how I go about it (others vary a bit in their style):
The first time you cite a source, format it as <ref name=anamehere>Citation here</ref>. All times after it, simply type <ref name=anamehere /> and the software will automatically format the citation for you. It's usual practice to choose the author's last name or a one-word description for the name. The name is completely arbitrary and doesn't show up in the article, only in the reference window.
I just went through and combined all the multiple citations, but this should help y'all in the future. Cheers! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:29, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]Women in Brazil (to which the properly-capitalized Women's rights in Brazil currently redirects) duplicates this topic. A merge should be carried out. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:59, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with the merge.2A02:2F0A:506F:FFFF:0:0:50C:DCD8 (talk) 22:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, looks like a merger is needed. Kaldari (talk) 06:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm starting to merge.2A02:2F0A:508F:FFFF:0:0:BC1A:B76A (talk) 12:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- I finished the merging.2A02:2F0A:508F:FFFF:0:0:BC1A:B76A (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm starting to merge.2A02:2F0A:508F:FFFF:0:0:BC1A:B76A (talk) 12:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, looks like a merger is needed. Kaldari (talk) 06:58, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Citations for Reproductive Rights
[edit]The first part of the Reproductive Rights section is poorly cited and referenced. There is no citation for the data on Brazil's birth rate or for the entirety of the third paragraph, which deals with a lot of information about prostitution and access to wellfareMdladams (talk) 16:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- B-Class Feminism articles
- Mid-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- B-Class Brazil articles
- Mid-importance Brazil articles
- WikiProject Brazil articles
- B-Class Gender studies articles
- Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- B-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Mid-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles