Talk:Origins of the Sino-Indian War

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Asian / Chinese / South Asia Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Chinese military history task force South Asian military history task force

wats with these indian in wiki being all so bias here. this article is such a bs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.11.142 (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply] 

I commented out a very large number of broken references for "Garver", "Calvin" as well as ones for "Guruswamy" and "VKSingh". Seems that the first two would be of great value if they could be found again. Ogre lawless (talk) 22:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the Garver reference to the main document. The link is also shown below. Ouyuecheng (talk) 16:09, 25 December 2009 (UTC) http://www.scribd.com/doc/19480031/China-India-War-1962[reply]

Provided a direct link to U of Harvard plus book citation for Garver - now we need page numbers for commented-out citations, which I assume were not present in the first place. Cheers, Rayshade (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The events that led to the Sino-Indian War in 1962 may be said to reach back to mid-19th century when the then Chinese inperial power went into decline and Tibet increasingly asserted its independence under successive Dalai Lamas. There are numerous references to these events and developments as documented by Alastair Lamb ("British India and Tibet 1766-1910", Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960/1986), H.E. Richardson ("Tibet and its History", Oxford University Press, 1962), Margaret Fisher et al ("Himalayan battleground", Frederick A. Praeger Inc., 1945), L. Petech ("China and Tibet in early 18th Century", E.J. Brill, Leiden, 1950) and others.Pidiji (talk) 01:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Origins of the Sino-Indian War/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 14:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Events leading to the Sino-Indian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326032121/http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/garver.pdf to http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~johnston/garver.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.epw.org.in/articles/2006/09/10532.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Events leading to the Sino-Indian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071013172913/http://hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2018/stories/20030912002104800.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2018/stories/20030912002104800.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050326174852/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2017/stories/20030829001604900.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2017/stories/20030829001604900.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010209084245/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-3/lns.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-3/lns.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this line from the article sourced to Neville Maxwell:

(I suppose the citation is wrong and the editor wanted to cite Maxwell's book.) The statement is the usual cherry-picked claptrap from Maxwell and is not directly relevant to the topic of this article.

Parshotham Mehra says in a book review:

Professor Lamb is a professional historian of great academic distinction; he is thorough, painstaking and, for the most part, at once sound and scholarly. This is not to gainsay that there are gaps both in his presentation as well as interpretation. Neville Maxwell is a different kettle of fish, a good journalist who has used historical data selectively to build one hypothesis and demolish another.^[1]

We see this selective cherry-picking here. Maxwell, who covered India throughout the 1950s as a BBC journalist, surely knew that Sikkim was a protectorate of India and Bhutan was a protected state of India.^[2][3][4] With some discretion, he might have also known how to distinguish between what is shown as part of India and what is shown in relation to India, like the map on the right here. But informing his readers of such niceties is not part of his plan.

Nor does he want to tell any truths remotely resembling these:

The Chinese - Imperial, Nationalist, Communist - have frequently talked, and sometimes tried to act, as if parts or all of Sikkim and Bhutan were their feudatories.^[5]

If one throws in the modern Chinese nationalist propositions that the People's Republic of China is the successor to the traditional Tibetan state and that Tibet is part of the family of nationalities making up the modern Chinese state, this means that Sikkim and Bhutan were virtually part of "China" for over 1,800 years.^[6]

In 1960, the Chinese leadership issued a statement was cause for concern in Bhutan: “Bhutanese, Sikkimese and Ladakhis form a united family in Tibet. They have always been subject to Tibet and to the great motherland of China. They must once again be united and taught the communist doctrine.”^[7]

Hmm... Ladakhis as well. Oh, my!

I count 26 citations to Maxwell on this page, roughly 20% of all citations. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:18, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]