Talk:Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance). Greater Manchester Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Yorkshire Low‑importance Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lancashire and Cumbria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway was copied or moved into Shipping of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:L&YR lines to Aintree.

I removed the following sentence from the first paragraph:

It was unique amongst the pre-grouping companies in that its main traffic flow was to and from east and west.

As stated, this is clearly false: what about the Great Western Railway! I can guess what was intended here, but it needs to be rephrased, and, importantly for any claims of uniqueness, needs to be backed up by an explicit reference.--Dr Greg (talk) 18:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway until late in its career. I note that there is nothing in this article about the company's works and its locomotives apart from a paragrah about livery. 86.145.167.29 (talk) 12:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a start-class article - it will likely be riddled with errors, and hardly anything is cited with references. If you have relevant published material (I do not) it would be lovely if you could contribute. I only have this article on my watchlist as I have a general interest in the history around Manchester. Parrot of Doom (talk) 13:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091231142723/http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/feeders.html to http://www.theshipslist.com/ships/lines/feeders.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two points.

• A frequent contributor to these pages has made a comment that the 1922 amalgamation was not total, but only a working arrangement. That should be in this article. Could someone find a citation in support?
• If you already know the subject, then this page is not for you. But if you don't know it, the page needs to tell you the answer to obvious questions. "It amalgamated with the London and North Western Railway on 1 January 1922." Q: What was the name of the combined company?

Yes I know it's obvious to insiders, but the page is for other people.

Afterbrunel (talk) 12:59, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the frequent contributor? If you don't inform them, they won't be aware that they are being asked. I've added a bit on the amalgamation. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I meant you, but thought it impolite to directly name you. There is something in the "rules" about not giving other contributors jobs. Afterbrunel (talk) 10:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where did I claim that the LYR/LNWR 1922 amalgamation was "not total, but only a working arrangement"? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:44, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's unclear which of Marshall's books the "Marshall 1981" citation is meant to reference. Can anyone more familiar with the topic assist? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 14:54, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've got a set of his "The Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway" (in three vols) but in none of them does page 155 mention the Blackburn to Chorley closure. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]