Talk:L'Oréal

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. France: Paris Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Paris task force.

The contents of the List of L'Oreal spokesmodels page were merged into L'Oréal on 2012-06-08. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on L'Oréal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150502221904/http://www.trustadvisory.info/allindia_2014.html to http://www.trustadvisory.info/allindia_2014.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20100424192639/http%3A//www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/anitas-163652m-sellout-470379.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on L'Oréal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120505045702/http://gladwell.com/2011/2011_03_28_a_color_of_money.html to http://www.gladwell.com/2011/2011_03_28_a_color_of_money.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141010122943/http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D14633%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html to http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID%3D14633%26URL_DO%3DDO_TOPIC%26URL_SECTION%3D201.html/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160403113833/http://standardethicsindices.eu/standard-ethics-french-index.html to http://www.standardethicsindices.eu/standard-ethics-french-index.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20170209165431/http://www.connexionfrance.com/court-appeal-price-fixing-fine-upheld-consumer-companies-gillette-loreal-procter-gamble-sc-johnson-18567-view-article.html to http://www.connexionfrance.com/court-appeal-price-fixing-fine-upheld-consumer-companies-gillette-loreal-procter-gamble-sc-johnson-18567-view-article.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

what's the word L'oreal mean? I used to think Oreo, but that's probably wrong.Feldercarb (talk) 17:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ya hemos pasao: Regarding the change: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%27Or%C3%A9al&type=revision&diff=964110165&oldid=963604713&diffmode=source firstly the change to "affirmed" adds bias as it is a strong word (meaning "emphatically state"), suggesting the extent of the company's feeling about the statement (which we do not know/cannot back up with a source). It is more accurate to say this was a claim by the company (something they are stating but cannot necessarily be backed up by a neutral observer). Secondly (and I think this would have been better as two separate changes) the changes to the skin whitening section remove essential context - you have said that the skin whitening creams have been criticised but removed a point about the reason for this criticism which was supported by a citation. Apologies but I took the liberty of undoing the change as you by deletion were undoing someone else's change. Evertent (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undid here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=L%27Or%C3%A9al&diff=971218517&oldid=971212759&diffmode=source Evertent (talk) 20:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Currently links to: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravisi%C3%B3n which is a television network in Paraguay and may have been created in 2005, https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paravisi%C3%B3n. I believe the article is talking about Paravision International, which is a different company that was created far earlier. I don't believe the company has an English or French page but it is referenced on this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StudioCanal and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Frydman. Link should probably just be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coystags (talk • contribs) 23:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]