Talk:International roughness index

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Civil engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article would benefit from a picture of a quarter car suspension system. 188.121.68.1 (talk) 08:27, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good suggestion! Done. Pirehelo (talk) 04:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on International Roughness Index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150403154512/http://www.lpcb.org/index.php/component/docman/doc_view/11127-2006-nz-comparison-of-roughness-calibration-equipment-with-a-view-to-increased-confidence-in-network-level-data?Itemid= to http://www.lpcb.org/index.php/component/docman/doc_view/11127-2006-nz-comparison-of-roughness-calibration-equipment-with-a-view-to-increased-confidence-in-network-level-data?Itemid=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the copy/past violation flag. Looking at the comparison at [1], the identified sections are either technical phrases or names of organizations, such as "National Cooperative Highway Research Program," or cover definitions and other material that has been present in the article since as early as 2010 ([2]) (five years prior to the publication of the thesis). It could well be that the material here is not 100% original, but it appears to substantially predate the identified source. Carter (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]