Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:Fraud Act 2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fraud Act 2006 Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland. I did think that I was being of assistance I will refrain in future.

Apologies, but we can't accept Crown Copyright material - the limitations on reuse mean we would need to exert control over how it's used in future, which we have no capacity to do. Sorry for the inconvenience. Shimgray | talk | 17:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Is it ok to post a link under 'external links' to the article Fraud Act 2006


I would suggest that, provided the condition of the copyright waiver is shown clearly on the page (i.e. quotes from the Act must only be from original Government sites, not from other quotes), Wikipedia would be covered. It is virtually impossible to discuss the exact effect of legislation without quoting some part of it.--Esthameian 01:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I find it difficult to understand why my contribution was deleted because the material was Crown Copyright. If Wikipedia aspires to provide accurate information to the general public there must, in my opinion, be room for Crown Copyright material to be posted.

"© Crown copyright 2002 - 2007
The material featured on this site is subject to Crown copyright protection unless otherwise indicated. The Crown copyright protected material (other than the Royal Arms and departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. Where any of the Crown copyright items on this site are being republished or copied to others, the source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged.
The permission to reproduce Crown protected material does not extend to any material on this site which is identified as being the copyright of a third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material must be obtained from the copyright holders concerned.
OPSI encourages users to establish hypertext links to this site." See OPSI website

Ron Barker (talk) 11:10, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Section for Civil Action for Fraud in Tort? Shouldn't this also reference an action for fraud in tort in English law? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.183.208.164 (talk) 15:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fraud Act 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]