Talk:Florida Everblades

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ice Hockey This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey Florida Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article's introduction contains conjectural statements ("The Everblades are thought of as a model franchise for the ECHL," "The Everblades' fanbase is also considered to be one of the best in the league") that are not supported by the supplied references. Please reword this section in such a fashion that ensures it meets the encyclopedic intent of Wikipedia. Cjmclark (talk) 21:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate the attempt to fix the issues I listed above, unfortunately the sentences in question still employ weasel words. It is not sufficient to say that the "Everblades are thought of by many in the ECHL as a model franchise" without having a source that clearly indicates that multiple individuals in the ECHL actually do think of them as such (not to mention that a model franchise ideally would have won the league championship at least once). Similarly, sourcing the team's attendance statistics does not support the statement that the "Everblades' fanbase is also considered to be one of the best in the league". You would need to have a source that directly states that many people (and ideally it would specify who those people are) consider the fanbase as such.

As far as sourcing, ideally the article would be supported primarily by reliable secondary sources such as newspapers. This is not to say that the ECHL and team websites aren't valid sources for information, but they shouldn't be the primary sources that the article depends on...they should be mostly for supporting data such as statistics and roster information. Google news can be extremely helpful in this regard, especially searching the archives. I would also check the website for the local newspaper for articles about the team.  Cjmclark ^(Contact) 02:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gailvila, thank you for your work on this article. We're almost there with the weasel word thing. Wikipedia can only report facts, and phrases such as "The Everblades are a model franchise in the ECHL..." and "The Everblades' fanbase is also one of the best in the league..." are opinion statements. A better way to word this would be to let the facts speak for themselves, i.e. "The Everblades have not missed the playoffs in any of their thirteen seasons and have made two appearances in the Kelly Cup Finals. The Everblades' fanbase has finished first in the league in attendance 5 times, and never lower than fourth." You could then remove the "This is according to the ECHL website" bit. Would you be amenable to this wording?  Cjmclark ^(Contact) 17:37, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see this page at WikiProject Ice Hockey for an example of how the page structure and layout should ideally look. The WikiProject is a great resource and I have gone there many times for assistance with hockey-related articles. Cheers.  Cjmclark ^(Contact) 17:42, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Florida Everblades. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140106041528/http://www.echl.com/stats-archive-p166310 to http://www.echl.com/stats-archive-p166310
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160105091102/http://www.echl.com/florida-s-muse-named-most-valuable-player-of-kelly-cup-playoffs-p177606 to http://www.echl.com/florida-s-muse-named-most-valuable-player-of-kelly-cup-playoffs-p177606
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150720203502/http://www.echl.com/reebok-goaltender-of-the-year-winners-p144415 to http://www.echl.com/reebok-goaltender-of-the-year-winners-p144415
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415031902/http://echl.com:80/reebok-equipment-manager-of-the-year-award-winners-p144432 to http://www.echl.com/reebok-equipment-manager-of-the-year-award-winners-p144432

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]