Talk:Cervical vertebrae

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anatomy: Gross High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

The contents of the Vertebra prominens page were merged into Cervical vertebrae. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

I've added this category to hold the previously unattributed and uncategorized comments on this talk page. The text below (preceding the next header) was present on the original page. James A. Stewart 23:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ailments of cervical vertebrae

is this page geared towards humans only, or also animals?

The derivation of the dens or odontoid process is "tooth." I'm not sure what language it's from, though. Also, the dens is what forms the pivot. This is not really made clear in the article.

Atlas for the C1 vertebra is a mythonym named for the titan Atlas. It is therefor a proper noun and should always be spelled with a capital A.

The spinous processes of cervical vertebra are frequently, but not always, bifid. The seventh cervical vertebra is rarely bifid, while the second almost always is. There is significant geographic (racial) variation in the frequency of bifid spinous processes on levels three through six. Claiming that bifid is a typical characteristic of human cervical vertebrae is both wrong, and may be unintentionally racist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.49.2.40 (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There has been recurrent vandalism of this page by 24.35.76.223. I've reverted it again, but the page may need to be locked. James A. Stewart 00:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism was corrected again on 2008-05-28 reverted to James A. Stewart's page

I'm looking at netters right now, and the landmarks specified in the wiki page are either a) wrong, or b) badly defined (how do you define the "level" of the vertabrae? is it at the middle of the body of the vertebrae? Using this definition, C4 is at the hyoid). Could someone please look this over. You can find the image here:

http://www.netterimages.com/image/569.htm --68.195.89.254 (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although the introduction of this article disusses cervical vertebrae of mammals in general, and even other animals, the body of the article is entirely confined to humans. Should probably decide if this article is to be human-only and if so, edit it accordingly, leaving the reptiles (etc.) out.

I have proposed a merge between the articles on C3-7 and this page, as I believe that this would improve the overall quality of this page, enhance its readability, and hopefully lead to more quality editing. If needed, these articles could be expanded at a later date. --LT910001 (talk) 07:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

I've noticed some edit warring in the history that happened on 29 December between Dschslava and 49.197.133.232. However, it's stopped now (possibly due to the 3RR?). Hdjensofjfnen (Is something wrong?) 22:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too less content in current form , to even be a stub. Will be good to either expand it here or better , make it a section of the main article Devopam (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)  Done[reply]

About symptoms and none surgical treatments 102.222.234.181 (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]