User talk:Trolli20

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to King (company) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: King (company) was changed by Trolli20 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95249 on 2016-08-31T10:00:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:00, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, King (company), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to King (company). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- ferret (talk) 12:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the King (company) article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:13, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at King (company). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop making small inappropriate edits in order to make promotional edit notes about the company. -- ferret (talk) 14:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at King (company). -- ferret (talk) 15:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you've received many warnings about this, so here's your final chance:

• Do not add fake or hoax information like you have here. This is objectively not true, and it's not okay your own speculation to Wikipedia.
• Stop making edits that serve no purpose. Edit summaries are not ways to communicate your personal thoughts or announcements. They're to explain your edit. This edit served no purpose - no edit or summary was necessary.
• Stop adding information to articles without adding a source. If you need help on this, read up here.

If you ignore any of these three warnings, you're going to be blocked from editing. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 21:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]