User talk:Tim96144/Archive 3

Your edit to Purple Hat has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Won't Go Quietly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cover Me Up.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Unbothered (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Test whether links work before adding them. Ss112 11:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Whoopty, you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 03:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:En så’n natt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you come to me weeks ago asking me if I can "help you out" doing chart positions, then you just proceed to do them yourself every week anyway. Do you just want somebody to compete with? It really seems like that's the only reason you asked me. If you're struggling to do them all yourself, funny, because you dedicate your whole Tuesday to doing them every week.

As for just now, it really looks like you saw me start doing the Hot 100 chart already so you started from 100 and then worked your way up instead of down as you ordinarily would. It's pretty telling that you did that, and it's also quite sad that you just have to find something to do so you start from the other end to get to those peaks before me. You really seem to have some serious obsession or compulsion with needing to update peaks yourself first and making edits on articles others have gotten to before you. Realise how annoying it is to start doing something yourself only to see somebody else interrupt you in a rush to do it themselves. Don't do that to editors.

In future, do not come to my talk page asking me for anything. You are petty and obsessed with the Billboard charts and I will not help you at all. I'll do what I want to do regardless of you. Ss112 15:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I explain the reason, because I hope accessdate can finish on the same day, just you see, you area Australia is UTC+9, and my area Taiwan is UTC+8, only one hour difference, and Hot 100 was updated late.... OK, if you think I do that is annoying, I swear, won't do the same behavior after. Tim96144 (talk) 15:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You know quite well I didn't mention anything in that message about accessdates. I was talking about how you started at the article for the lowest chart peak that hadn't been updated, Moonwalking in Calabasas, and worked your way up to higher chart positons at Somebody Like That (song), instead of going down the chart like usual. You have done this same thing before (updating articles by reverse order) when I've started updating a chart before you so you can obviously get to chart positions before me. I don't see any other reason for why you would start going from the bottom of a chart up other than to cut another editor going down the chart off. I said don't do that because it's annoying and it's petty behaviour. Ss112 16:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	编辑星章
	Greetings from mainland China! I appreciate you and your persistent updates of record charts. Keep going bro! BrandNew Jim Zhang (talk) 15:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know a single other editor from Taiwan who's been interested in updating charts on Wikipedia, so don't post on my talk page on a mobile device while logged out either, or next time I Will file a sockpuppet investigation on you. You're very capable of updating charts yourself—as you're doing right now—and still you pester me about it. Don't try it again. If somebody chooses not to do what they normally do, that's their choice—I hardly think they're going to be persuaded by broken English screeds on their talk page. By the way, you should also be reverting these editors updating Hot 100 peaks without an additional citation ahead of time instead of updating charts around them. Ss112 01:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir, but the IP isn't me, maybe some editor from other area in Taiwan attempt to make trouble you, so I emphasize again, It's NOT ME!! Don't mistakenly point the finger at me. Tim96144 (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Way Less Sad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Do you have access to this website? ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 11:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please review my FA nomination of Love for Sale (Bilal album). Doing so would have the added benefit of offering me another inkling of happiness to my little existence. The criteria for featured articles is at WP:FACR, in case you aren't familiar and would like to. Happy editing either way! isento (talk) 06:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ss112. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Traitor (song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ss112 10:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lifetime (Swedish House Mafia song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supergroup.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:All My Love Cash Cash featuring Conor Maynard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not a native English speaker and you need to compensate for this when creating articles. It should not fall to me or any other editor who comes across your articles to have to almost entirely rewrite whole sections because you've either taken an entire quote without putting it between quotation marks because you cannot or refuse to learn to paraphrase (as you did on Cold as You—this can land you in WP:COPYVIO territory if you keep it up) or you've phrased something in a garbled way that makes little to no sense. Please use an online grammar service or find another way to have your articles proofread if you insist on repeatedly creating articles on the English Wikipedia. Anyone else who encounters you as much as I do would be exactly as frustrated as I am in this situation. And yet you still insist on following my edits and making sure I get my "chart updates" correct and to your liking. Focus on your own shortcomings. Three or four articles in one day using the same nonsensical way of attempting to quote from websites without attribution is enough. Thank you. Ss112 17:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Chain My Heart has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Ss112 18:59, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COPYVIO concerns are very serious and not acceptable on Wikipedia. The occasional typo or error is forgivable - no one is perfect - but repeated copyright issues are repeated serious errors - we simply cannot tolerate copyright issues. If you dont have the ability to fix this, then you are not ready to be writing content on Wikipedia, let alone writing articles from scratch. You need to stop adding content immediately, until you fully understand the message of WP:PARAPHRASE. If you make any more copyright violations, your account will be blocked, with the unblock condition that you can only create articles if you get them approved through WP:AFC. Sergecross73 msg me 14:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for 3 days. As I said, copyvios/plagiarism are very serious problems. Blaming it on a language barrier is not enough - if you don't have the ability to write things in your own words, then you are not ready to be creating your own articles from scratch, and should focus on editing other things until you're ready. Please spend your block trying to understand WP:COPYVIO and WP:PARAPHRASE. Additionally, I recommend using WP:AFC for future article creation, and making sure they approve your drafts. They will verify it isn't a COPYVIO. Every time I spot a new COPYVIO from you, you're going to receive a another longer block, so that may be a safer option for you until you better understand the problem. Sergecross73 msg me 22:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended to 1 week because you're obvious block evading. I'm really disappointed that instead of addressing these issues, you decided to edit under an IP address instead. I really feel like I tried to work with you, and give you the benefit of the doubt, but it really appears that you've been doing the things that they've been accusing you of. If I catch you block evading again, I'm switching your block time to indefinite. Sergecross73 msg me 01:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don't Be Shy (Tiësto and Karol G song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Business.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tim96144 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First, I need say sorry for all administrators and users that post any warnings for me, because I'm immature, cause any users troubles. Recently these 2 ~ 3 days, I spent all day reading Wikipedia's various guides, including I committed error (ex:Wikipedia:Copyright violations, Wikipedia:Block evasion), join Wiki for 2 years, has many thing I must understand. With this bitter lesson, next time I will more notice every edit. In the future I won't create any pages, until I read Wikipedia:Copyright violations in detail, afterwards, I only edit Billboard charts and charts peak positions that not completed, it also my original intention, can't forget it. :I promise with this bitter lesson, I will pay attention to every edits, avoid receiving warning notification, if unfortunately get it, also won't say a lot of reasons, because I know making mistake must punish, I believe I won't dare to do it in the future. ::Besides, since October 2019, I have used this account editing 16,000 time, most are articles about songs, singles, or albums that charts, sometimes these peak positons are incomplete, if nobody want to edit this, most is edited by me, I think I have contribute for Wiki. Tim96144 (talk) 11:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were only blocked yesterday, and before you were blocked, you spent your time on Sergecross73's talk page bargaining about how you would not create articles until a certain date; minimising what you had done; claiming I had an "opinionated attitude" and was just trying to get you in trouble; demanding I should be more "tolerant" to your English ability although we were addressing your eight-plus months of copyright issues; and then attempting to be antagonistic to myself and Ferret about our contributions. You have not spent "2–3 days" reading various guides, and you definitely haven't spent that long reading Wikipedia:Block evasion considering you were only caught block evading 12 hours ago (why would you have been reading our policies on block evasion before you did and even if you had, then proceed to do it anyway?) and had your block extended because of it. This is just straight-up nonsense, just like your "plagiarism tool" bit yesterday. Ss112 13:09, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73: I have already known severity of the thing (Wikipedia:Copyright violations), I also afraid my account is blocked forever, if I recover editing, I will restart, the previous me was died, please give me a chance, please!! Tim96144 (talk) 13:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll comment, since it seems other admin are so far reluctant to weigh in. Your account isn't blocked forever - just 1 week - but I have a hard time rationalizing unblocking you early when we've already had multiple talks about COPYVIOs and not editing while logged out, and it didn't keep you from getting blocked for both here this week. I'll let another admin formally answer the edit request, but I imagine they'll let the week long block run it's course. Sergecross73 msg me 17:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences.

I'm sorry if it seems as though I'm piling on (looking at the other activity on your talk page), but when I see −3,705 bytes for one edit, I immediately suspect some sort of vandalism. As it turns out, your edit was very useful, but it would be nicer, IMO, if you would include an edit summary to indicate what you're aiming for (before others look at the diff). Thanks! — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 17:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating the chart rankings for Dream with Me. Would you mind taking a look at Evancho's other albums to make sure the charts are complete? Thanks for any help! -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated assertion that you would not create articles until you understood copyright better or entirely didn't last very long. Let me guess: the solution is now to just create articles with next to no content on them besides an infobox and charts? Ss112 14:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you literally only follow my edits to make changes like this? If you can't make a more substantial edit than an unnecessary change like this, I suggest you stop checking up on what I'm doing and stick with your own way of finding things to edit. You've proven yourself to be a problematic editor, editing while logged out and the copious amounts of copyright issues, so there is still reason for you to be checked up on. I, however, don't have those issues, so I don't need to be shadowed by you. The manual citation links directly to the entry for the song, which some users consider beneficial. The use of Template:Single chart has never been a requirement. Bear that in mind next time. Ss112 13:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Serotonin Girl in Red.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lost Frequencies Don't Leave Me Now.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 'Til You Can't, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Thank you for creating Someday (Kygo and Zac Brown song). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title (or, as in this case, overwrite a previous redirect), please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie Someday), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find your article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 09:19, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD: Thanks your help!! Tim96144 (talk) 12:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tim96144: Never put a shop reference in an article, ever, please. There is only outcome of that if its repeated over time and that is a visit to Ani. Use worldcat instead. It is considered promotional i.e WP:PROMO, breaking Wikipedia Terms of Use, so please don't add it back in. scope_creep^Talk 12:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This oversighting BS where you think you know better than others who add charts needs to cease right now. On short articles or articles where the charts are squeezed next to the infobox, we do not, and in the latter case, should not, put a column break in. I deliberately didn't do this on the majority of articles where you then thought to come check and correct me and put one in. Stop this. I'm also going to say right now: I'll be doing all the year-end charts for the international charts I update every week when they are released. Even if it's a few hours later or a few minutes later, I will be checking and doing them. Please don't bother trying to do them or get in my way, like you did earlier with the Rhythmic charts, as that is incredibly annoying to do to any editor. May I remind you that you don't bother updating these international charts throughout the year, whereas I do. Therefore you really shouldn't only take interest in their year-end stats. Find something else to edit, these will absolutely be done and are covered. Thank you. Ss112 09:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DanTheMusicMan2, Ss112, and Lk95: Because of myself need to join the military training for two week for country since December 20, 2021, so i will suspend to edit for two week until January 7, 2022, please help me update the Billboard charts, thanks! Tim96144 (talk) 02:23, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tim, it is getting tedious to find you have still not been able to paraphrase, and when you do try, your grammar is poor. For the love of God stop copying large chunks of text and thinking indicating it's a quote is going to save you. Quoting is only acceptable up to a point, as reproducing portions is considered to be fair use—if you're constantly reproducing significant portions of text because you can't write anything yourself, it's also a copyright violation. The whole big paragraph you copied verbatim on Bruxelles je t'aime of Angèle talking about how Brussels is like a "lover" to her is really not that important and did not necessitate copying. I think it's inevitable at this point that at some point in the near future, an admin is going to tag you for copyright violations and all your edits to Wikipedia will be gone over to weed out plagiarism. I say inevitable because you've previously attracted the attention of Diannaa who revdel'ed several of your edits, and you have demonstrated that you cannot stop creating articles for songs that appear on charts you follow. Ping @Sergecross73: for posterity to note this habitual inability to paraphrase is a long-term thing and will not cease. Ss112 11:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot be creating articles that are virtually entirely copy/pasted from sources. You need to write in your own words. I recommended that you don't create articles until you understood this. You didn't listen. I asked you to submit article creations through WP:AFC. You didn't listen. You either won't, or cannot, comply. So you are blocked. This time, it's 1 month. This will be your last chance. Next time will be indefinite. Sergecross73 msg me 12:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tim96144 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I think myself was very pay attention to the copyright problem, I carefully quoted other articles, add quotation marks between the cited articles head and tail, I didn't understood why did I blocked by administrator again, I thinked I'm correct, I used quotation marks to avoid copyright.

Decline reason:

This is almost incoherent. Regardless, it does not convince me that you understand WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. Yamla (talk) 13:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Read WP:QUOTEFARM. That's a description of a portion of what you're doing wrong. You're not writing articles, you're just copy/pasting large quotes over and over again. If you don't understand the concepts there or at WP:COPYVIO, quite frankly, I just don't think you're ready to be writing prose on the English Wikipedia. I've tried to work with you, but youve refused to use avenues like WP:AFC to review your work prior to publishing. Sergecross73 msg me 13:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]