User talk:The RedBurn

Dr.Ommaya died on 11 july 2008 at islamabad,pakistan.I was his family doctor here in pakistan.

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Crunchy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Crunchy provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Crunchy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. --Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Northrop N-102 Fang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northrop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the Chennai event in March, the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, or any other of our events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumanah (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samsung Galaxy Mini 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DragonLord. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Intel HD Graphics seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Your edit used the term "Digital Restrictions Management", replacing "rights" with "restrictions" in the original term "digital rights management". This replacement is common among anti-DRM advocates who want to emphasize that DRM restricts legal uses of copyrighted content. However, as much as we hate DRM, this phrasing is non-neutral because it favors this anti-DRM position. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 17:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DragonLord, You're right, it's not the right phrasing. I took it from the HDCP article and I felt something was wrong about it, but I couldn't say what. Now I know. The HDCP article may need to be corrected though. The RedBurn (ϕ) 19:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edited the High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection article to correct the issue. I've struck out the first part of the warning because this wasn't really your fault. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 21:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Found the relevant edit and issued a warning to the correct user. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 21:21, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DragonLord! By the way, there seem to be more articles where "rights" is replaced by "restrictions". The RedBurn (ϕ) 21:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French cleat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabinet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Dyson (company) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have broken the 1RR restriction on a Troubles-related article by performing two reverts within 24 hours on Great Famine (Ireland). The first edit you made today was a revert, as explained in my edit summary, because that content has been in the article before. Be aware that repeated violations of the 1RR restriction can lead to topic bans and blocks. DrKay (talk) 19:22, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DrKay, Thank you for you message. I may not have understood that rule correctly, but how did I break it? I only made one revert ([1]), didn't I? Anyway, it probably wouldn't have been necessary had I added the ref right away. The RedBurn (ϕ) 19:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for inadvertently failing to explain my revert. WP:DDD is merely a summary of guidelines. MOS:DABPRIMARY states more specifically that "When the ambiguous term has a primary topic but that article has a different title (so that the term is the title of a redirect), the primary topic line normally uses the redirect to link to that article[.]" (Emphasis added.) --R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thank you for the info. I indeed found out about it later. Though I'd still prefer to see the plain link as I was searching for a link "United States", not "America". I really like the guideline for not piping the links and I would have preferred it applied even for the main topic. The RedBurn (ϕ) 09:13, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at this edit. You overwrote my previous change. Could you fix that please? -- RoySmith (talk) 17:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry RoySmith, it's fixed. The RedBurn (ϕ) 17:45, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crankcase ventilation system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Direct injection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Biobag. Since you had some involvement with the Biobag redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Generation Kill characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wayne Harrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Foundational medicine. Since you had some involvement with the Foundational medicine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AGM-136 Tacit Rainbow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northrop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Numatic International logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see in a recent addition to List of HTTP status codes you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 11:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Diannaa, no problem! The RedBurn (ϕ) 16:03, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I forgot to put it in my edit summary, but MOS:DABABBREV and MOS:DABMENTION is where we outline the minimum requirements for disambiguation links. Happy editing. -- Fyrael (talk) 15:24, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's mentioned in Robotic lawn mower. What's the best way to include both with only one link? The RedBurn (ϕ) 15:45, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look to me like either article is providing any information about this Exact Positioning Operating System. If I were you I would gather a couple reliable sources, add some relevant information about it to an article, and then link to that article from the disambiguation page. -- Fyrael (talk) 18:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to comment on the merger discussion on Talk:Flexible tanks. Pkgx (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Common image aspect ratios has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Android Runtime, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jank.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Android 13

added a link pointing to Jank

Android version history

added a link pointing to Jank

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Android 13, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jank.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At some point in the nearer rather than further future, .hlist styles will be removed from Common.css and Mobile.css in favor of TemplateStyles. This is a headsup to adjust what this script is doing. The replacement is at Template:Hlist/styles.css in case you wish to load the sheet in JavaScript instead. Izno (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! We finish talking before we reverse what's being discussed on an article's talk page. One would think you know that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Junkers Ju 87 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please do not put close paraphrasing of a source in the article text. It has to be written in your own words. A one-sentence quote in the ref is fine, where needed. BilCat (talk) 04:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a perfect quote of the original text, but feel free to rephrase it instead of reverting my edits. The RedBurn (ϕ) 04:15, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would have, but close paraphrasing is still considered a copyvio, and much of the text was word for word. An administrator will review it, but please don't restore it without rewriting it. Also, I don't believe your addition meets the WP:MILPOP guidelines for pop-culture mentions,as it's not about the aircraft as a whole. If we had an article on the siren, that would be the appropriate place for it, as.of now, we don't. BilCat (talk) 04:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said that you could "rephrase it" to prevent it to be "close paraphrasing", I don't see what prevents you to do it except the fact that you don't seem to want to see this addition to the article and seem to try to find any pretext to remove it. The RedBurn (ϕ) 04:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are two issue involved. Copy violations, which are legal matters, and whether the content is appropriate, which is an editorial matter. In either case, you shouldn't be restoring the content, as that is edit warring. Instead, you need to use the article's talk page, and get a consensus to restore it first. BilCat (talk) 04:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So I guess you "would have" rephrased it, but you didn't want that content in the article. Each time I've restored the content, I've tried the fix the issues you mentioned. If it doesn't meet WP:MILPOP for a pop culture section, it can be moved to a different section. I put it there because I didn't find a section about the "trumpet". The RedBurn (ϕ) 04:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Invasive carp has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22 § Invasive carp until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:55, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Static row numbers no rank has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HouseBlaster^talk 01:03, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]