User talk:tdowling

Hi Tim, I noticed you reverted my edits about old navy moving. It actually did move, to North Point shopping center in Arlington Heights. The space is currently vacant. thanks... bobsmith319.

Hi Bobsmith - sorry about that. For some reason I went a little nuts with the Old Navy move thing. I hope you don't mind, though, that I made a couple edits to what you put in (some spacing and capitalization, and I think that previous edits had placed Steve & Barry's at what used to be Old Navy). Let me know if I'm wrong in any of it. --Tim D 00:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tim, that is perfectly fine that you went nuts. Steve and Barry's is located in the former Applebee's space. The old Navy location still sits empty, as far as I know... I havn't been in Mount Prospect since August.

Thanks,

bobsmith319.

Hi Tim, The "Learn the Signs. Act Early." campaign informs people about autism and many other developmental disabilities such as hearing loss, vision loss, cerebral palsy, and general childhood development. That is why these links are on other pages that are not concerning autism. Please let me know if you have more questions. Thanks!...learnthesigns

Discussion is at Learnthesigns

I added the protect tag just until these vandals calm down and finish with their fun. Mind help reporting a few of these to WP:AIV with me? Wildthing61476 19:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's pretty out of control...and the tag didn't seem to be working from what I could tell. I need to step away, but I'll see what I can do later if needed. -- Tim D 19:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To let you know that your gentle snarkiness made me chuckle here. Dina 18:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you appreciated it...it seemed to be kind of a snarky-worthy situation -- Tim D 21:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I didn't know you were from Illinois! All insults taken back. I hope you enjoyed my humor! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.175.196.164 (talk) 17:30, 11 November 2006

No worries, friend! -- Tim D 23:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But of course life long friend and companion! (no real insult meant, I just enjoy this game)

G'day Tim, normally I never revert any talk page stuff but I'm glad you did with regard to virgin impregnations. Sometimes I can't help myself when replying to daft (and misspelt) questions. I didn't feel I could then go and revert my own rubbish when I am hassling Bobsmith about his 'censorship', so thanks again! Maustrauser 21:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, no problem. Nothing against your responses, really...the original question just didn't belong there and I figured there was a good chance that it was just a troll or something. -- Tim D 04:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On my computer the dialog boxes overlap, the Daily Show Correspondents box and the various Wiki boxes. It doesn't matter though someone else rearranged the sub-sections. Naufana : talk 19:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay - I had a feeling that was it. Still looked misaligned from my browser, though...it was just a bad place for the boxes I guess. -- Tim D 02:18, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see current version of Day of the Dead, and I'd be interested in your global comments. LAVisitor1 09:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll take a look at it a little later today when I'm done shoveling myself out of snow and I have the time to reflect :) -- Tim D 18:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim, I spent almost one hour yesterday evening to write facts on what pregnant women should eat (or not), and you remove the whole thing because "unencyclopedic"

Would you be so kind to explain what it means:

- do you think this topic does not belong to this page, or

- is the style too relaxed (I can easily change that)

Thank you for your answer, Denis Corpet 22:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Denis - I see that the discussion is going on in the talk page, so I guess we can keep it there. I figured that you spent some time on what you wrote, but at least it doesn't disappar into a void. I just wanted to err on the conservative side of things until the wording and such can be adjusted. -- Tim D 23:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A colleague and I are conducting a study on health wikis. We are looking at how wikis co-construct health information and create communities. We noticed that you are a frequent contributor to Wikipedia on health topics.

Please consider taking our survey here.

This research will help wikipedia and other wikis understand how health information is co-created and used.

We are from James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia. The project was approved by our university research committee and members of the Wikipedia Foundation.

Thanks, Corey 15:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question for you, if you don't mind, about how you would compare the direction your revision of the autism article is compared to the featured article version, or perhaps to the version up for AfD? Do you feel eerie gusts from paper shuffling, what with the closing of ranks signaling a possible consolidation of hegemony? What does Jonathan's Law mean to you in the context of the cloaking rituals taking place across the vast breadth of the Wiki's medical articles? Ombudsman 02:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about the restoring of what had been removed a couple days ago, I mainly did that because the previous edit was anonymous and unexplained. Looking at it again now, I see the content as being kind of iffy overall and would at the very least need some references to go along with it. It's a bit preachy. Now, I haven't been keeping up with what's been going on in the circle of autism articles, so I'll need some catching up with the politics of everything. Concerning that, what exactly are you hinting? Also, I'm not quite catching where Jonathan's Law would come into play since by my understanding, that is focused on specific records of specific children. Correct me if I'm wrong, though. -- Tim D 10:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment. The work is tedious without a bot to help me but at the same time I find it enjoyable. To answer your first question, yes I did upload a layered image at wikimedia commons for anyone to edit. You can find it here[1]. Unfortunately, I didn't make one for photoshop. A small explanation is on the image's talk page. I'm going to upload an updated version very soon.

I don't mind adding the mt. prospect image so I'll do that very soon. Take care! — oo64eva (Alex) ^{(U | T | C)} @ 23:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Alex! I appreciate the response. A nice image will really add to the Mt. Prospect entry. -- Tim D 04:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tim, I still have not gotten to those images. I apologize for not being more timely but I've been extraordinarily busy. I should have those up within the next few weeks. — oo64eva (Alex) ^{(U | T | C)} @ 18:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that's okay. There's no schedule here...things get done when they get done! -- Tim D 04:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, David Ayoub, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ayoub. Thank you. Sideshow Bob Roberts 20:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:APA-logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In view of your contributions to the Autism article, would you please comment at this AfD (if you have not already done so). I'm looking to close that AfD, but it seems to need more comment. Thanks. -- Jreferee T/C 17:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caught this request a little late; sorry I couldn't contribute! -- Tim D 16:41, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I need your help. I am working on a research project at Boston College, studying creation of medical information on Wikipedia. You are being contacted, because you have been identified as an important contributor to one or more articles.

Would you will be willing to answer a few questions about your experience? We've done considerable background research, but we would also like to gather the insight of the actual editors. Details about the project can be found at the user page of the project leader, geraldckane. Survey questions can be found at geraldckane/medsurvey. Your privacy and confidentiality will be strictly protected!

The questions should only take a few minutes. I hope you will be willing to complete the survey, as we do value your insight. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Professor Kane if you have any questions.

Thank You, Sam4bc (talk) 00:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing up the ADHD section. This page is vandalised so frequently, it's a relief to see a real and useful edit. twirligig^{Leave one! ⋄ Check me out!} 02:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help! I may do a couple more edits if I find some time; some spots sound like they were taken from student research papers or something... Tim D (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tim, do you have access to the Swanson paper that describes effects of Adderall on students? The reference I found (Greenhill) says that teachers' perceptions of students behavior improved; the article currently says that students' perceptions of their teachers improved. The Greenhill paper just summarizes the Swanson paper, though, so the Swanson paper would be the better reference. --Ben Kovitz (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I found the abstract. :) The Greenhill summary is right. I'll fix Adderall right now. --Ben Kovitz (talk) 17:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that, Ben. The section has a much more crisp feel to it now. I'm not sure what I was thinking when I thought I saw that students rated their teachers more highly with Adderall. It clearly is the other way around! One of my many brain farts, I guess. Tim D (talk) 03:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Brandmeier-wgn.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:15, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have converted your request to rename the article from "technical" to "potentially controversial", as it is not completely clear that we are dealing with a proper noun. The discussion may be found at Talk:Response to intervention#Requested move. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. Response to Intervention is a major educational term/concept that is indeed a proper noun. (see, for example, http://idea.ed.gov/explore/view/p/,root,dynamic,QaCorner,8, and http://rti4success.org). I'll note this at the discussion as well. -- Tim D (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have a WP:Reliable Source for Mary and Abby's partner status that you inserted here: [4]? If you have one, that would be great to add back in. 97.85.173.38 (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:American Psychological Association (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tdowling. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tdowling. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Psychoeducational is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychoeducational until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 13:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Tdowling|<font color="green">TimD</font>]] [[User talk:Tdowling|<font color="gray"><sup>''[talk]''</sup></font>]] : TimD ^[talk]

to

[[User:Tdowling|<span style="color: green">TimD</span>]] [[User talk:Tdowling|<sup style="color: gray">''[talk]''</sup>]] : TimD ^[talk]

—Anomalocaris (talk) 09:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the heads up! —TimD ^[talk] 18:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know that I've started WikiProject Western Governors University, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of WGU. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Paul Smith111977 (talk) 12:02, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tdowling. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Clarence "Sonny" Henry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Stub for 12 years, unlikely to be expanded, not really a jazz guitarist, few sources exist about him as an individual

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vmavanti (talk) 18:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]