User talk:Tucady

Hello, Tucady,

Thank you for creating Research.com.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Welcome and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I was reviewing your article Research.com and noticed that none of the sources you used appear to meet the standard of significant coverage required for inclusion on Wikipedia. Additionally, do you have any connection to the company? If so, you must disclose the connection.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dan Leonard}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 22:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Research.com. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Licatatom per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Licatatom. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 10:56, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]