User talk:Silver Pavilion

Hi Kishore Editing I have reverted your edit at Viswasam for two reasons:-

• Per per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summaries should be between 400 and 700 words - your edit increased it from edit increased it from 809 (slightly too long) to 1043 words (much too long)
• Also per WP:FILMPLOT "Do not include actors' names in the plot summary since it is considered redundant to the "Cast" section."

It might be worth your while reading WP:FILMPLOT before spending too much time editing film plots - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 08:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've had to do revert some of your edits at Darbar (film) - for the same reasons - Arjayay (talk) 08:29, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, S. P. Balasubrahmanyam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 17:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the first time Suriname has been invited to the Delhi Republic Day Parade, so it is not a second invitation. Kindly understand the article and the list and adhere to, not adding incorrect information to Wikipedia. Thank you. Peter Ormond (talk) 02:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Kadaram Kondan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Darbar (film) ‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:57, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Project 75I-class submarine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalvari-class submarine. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Nilgiri-class frigate (2019), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - wolf 21:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Along with the preview function, you can also use your sandbox to set-up edits. In the space of about a day, you've made 75 consecutive edits to this page (so far). That's is a significant portion of the page's history and a lot of watchlist notifications for all the editors watching this page. Instead, use preview to ensure an edit is correct before saving, and for any content you intend to make mass-changes to, just copy the existing section to your sandbox, make the changes there (with as many edits as you like), then copy that content back over to the article to replace the existing section's content. This will greatly cut down on the number of edits made to the article. Thank you - wolf 21:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted multiple edits of your owing to bad source or improper license used. Please stop adding inane edits again and again. If your edits are reverted there is a reason for it. Please do not re-edit them before correcting the issue.Shashpant (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Enemy (2021 film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.
When a plot is already tagged as too long, you need to make it shorter, not longer - Arjayay (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Enemy (2021 film), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kishore Editing! Your additions to Anti-Submarine Warfare Shallow Water Craft (ASW-SWC) corvette have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kishore Editing. I noticed that your recent edit to Invincible-class submarine added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 05:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheGEICOgecko. I noticed that you recently removed content from PageName without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheGEICOgecko (talk) 04:27, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kishore Editing, to be clear, it seems that you had removed content to fix it. If this was your intention, please add back the content before you publish your edit. There should not be an intermediary phase where you delete a bunch of content without explanation, no matter how quick you add it back in. TheGEICOgecko (talk) 04:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dakar-class submarine, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please read the following MOS:HYPHEN, MOS:CAPITALIZATION, MOS:OVERLINK Llammakey (talk) 13:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Llammakey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Invincible-class submarine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Llammakey (talk) 12:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at KSS-III submarine. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Llammakey (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TAI/AgustaWestland T129 ATAK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justice and Development Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This unreliable website says EW suite made by DRDO is spelled SHAKTI and you are writing SHAKTHI. Please clear it. Please stop editing from unreliable sources.I ame Shears (talk) 05:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dakar-class submarine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dakar-class submarine, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kishore Editing! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dakar-class submarine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:26, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand the use of the compound adjective (i.e use of hyphenation in ship class names), overlinking and that the See also section is for links not previously mentioned in the article. Llammakey (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Kishore_Editing reported by User:Llammakey (Result: ). Thank you. Llammakey (talk) 10:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Hope you are doing good. First, I am sorry I didn't mention the reason, I intended to but somehow I pressed the enter before I noticed that no reason was mentioned. I edited the part because it was plain and simple bunkum.

1. P17a does house internal bay for RHIB, the user you quote did mention in some other tweet. Moreover, you can't use any tom dick and harry views on Wikipedia. The source has to be WP:RS complaint.

2. Shivalik class has VLS Barak-1. Not sure why you are quoting random stuff.

3. P17 and 17A are not related. Its just a follow-on. P17a is built around P15 design albeit a bit smaller. Also you have put random ref around the text and none of the source corroborate what you said. Shashpant (talk) 07:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note WP:FILMPLOT recommends 400-700 words. You expanded the plot section considerably beyond that. If you are going to add something to a plot section you will need to also remove something else to keep within the recommended plot length, or your changes are likely to be reverted. -- 109.77.195.1 (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. All the articles follow the Wikipedia:Article titles policy. When you are boldly moving a page to a new title, please specify the reason according to the policy, and not that [t]he previous title appears unsatisfactory as you did at New Indian parliament building (see log). Thanks! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 09:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tughril-class frigate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commodore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that this revision made by you is tagged with "use of deprecated (unreliable) source". Please be considerate enough to use acceptable sources and remember that Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Thanks. 🔮Plpm2021💬 07:15, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the deprecated source. Thanks for notifying me. Kishore Editing (talk) 07:31, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Project-75 (India) submarine acquisition project, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golda (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Air transports of heads of state and government, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wing of Zion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have lifted the word count warning since the word count is at 685 words, and not the max of 700 words. It is okay to do so? TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 04:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is okay to lift the warning. Such a move could be compelling for other editors to stop interfering in making edits to the film's plot.

Thank you Silver Pavilion (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome :) TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be prudent if you recommended any action against such an editing fest. Even after the warning I gave on 19 December, editors still continue to morph the plot's writing to satisfy their own perspectives. Something should be done to stop and discourage such action.

Thank you. Silver Pavilion (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I still watch the plot editing fest daily and change if it doesn't fit the criteria for how it should be written. 1. No extending sentences via semicolons and commas. Keep it how it should be. 2. Inferencing and unneeded info should not be used, such as saying that the standoff in the film should be called a Mexican standoff. 3. No trying to make the plot writing seem forced or poetically, such as overusing transition words. And obviously, for number 4, there should be no vandalizing. I think these 4 rules should apply for writing a plot essay for a movie. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 21:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you lock the page? I came back today, and the hive has grown worse again. Also, I think Mike Allen is on a alt account. TheEpicApartmentLord (talk) 21:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief of the Naval Staff (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secretariat Building.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kalvari-class submarine (2015), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Kalvari-class submarine (2015) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 01:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Acknowledged, but nevertheless, the contents of the attached article forms a part of the subject's history and is thus, in my opinion, worthy of being mentioned. Is it agreeable to re-mention the part that was erased, provided it is from a different news outlet.? Silver Pavilion (talk) 12:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not which news outlet you used; it's that you copied material directly from your source. That's a violation of our copyright policy. Everything you add to Wikipedia needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa (talk) 17:08, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief of Defence Staff (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Command.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chiefs of Staff Committee (India), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]