User talk:Schofield GT

I don’t often edit pages, so my apologies for making the error of citing a Wikipedia page as a source. Of course, I wouldn’t consider it when writing an academic paper, but I thought if I were ever presented with the opportunity to do so this would be the place. For what it’s worth, the article on civilian awards/decoration in the United States is nicely done, although this point is irrelevant now.

I certainly didn’t intend on ruffling any feathers and I don’t suggest the quote be removed; however, it does seem important enough to follow-up with factual information. I’m happy to find a source that is not Wikipedia-based and do so if you are amenable to the update. Even though his statement is an opinion, it doesn’t make it any less important to correct (of course, this is my own humble opinion).

I certainly have no idea what Mr. Stewart would think or want in this case. I do know if I had misspoken and a direct quote was in the public domain, I would want accurate information to follow it.

Thank you for your time. I appreciate the information about proper citations in Wikipedia articles and will make use of it in the future. ScienceJohn99 (talk) 04:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SolarFlash. Your recent edit(s) to the page John Lydon appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SolarFlash^{Let's talk about it} 19:16, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit of the Michael Caine article. If you read the Cockney article you will see that Michael Caine is mentioned several times as an example with a Cockney accent. Registreernu (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]