User talk:SE KinG

If you leave me a message, I will respond on YOUR talk page.

Thank you, I was just about to add the download from DuBCNN. --JpGrB 20:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, how do you source a publication? because F.U. was confirmed in Rolling Stone magazine. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 12:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it in the magazine. Not the website. Could you kindly tell me how to cite a publication? Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 12:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & paste is not how you move a page. Especially considering that "like" should not be capitalized and that the "Stuntin Is a Habit" part is shown in the iTunes title. ILikeMusicaLot (talk) 13:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You missed my point. If you want to move a page,copy and paste is not the right way to do it. ILikeMusicaLot (talk) 14:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well,if you believe that it should be moved,join the discussion on the article's talk page. ILikeMusicaLot (talk) 19:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you added a ref, thank you. I had just been wondering if this or this, could be more reliable than a YouTube video? I may be mistaken, but i thought I'd just pass along some possibly helpful links. Happy editing. --HELLØ ŦHERE 09:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to take those off your upcoming albums you are working on, they are already out, lol. It's straight though.

--Piazzajordan2 (Talk.) 03:34, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.

--Piazzajordan2 (Talk.) 03:43, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

—Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 04:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Where?" Ha ha, I said that already. Lol, just kidding. --HELLØ ŦHERE 00:31, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		For your edit summary linked above. I was looking through the history and saw the edit summary, and was interested of what took place in the edit. I saw it, and I laughed out loud. DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 06:24, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The-Dream's myspace is /thedreamteam, NOT /defjamdream!

MySpace lists /thedreamteam as his official page, and his Radio Killa websitre leads to /thedreamteam.

Hey there SE KinG, I noticed you added a 'Lyrics' section to "Dead and Gone", but didn't back it up with a source. Think you can cite a source? DiverseMentality 06:19, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the 'Lyrics' to 'Reception' to correspond with the reference. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 07:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty, thanks. DiverseMentality 07:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		Merry Christmas!
		DiverseMentality is wishing you a Merry Christmas! Hope you have a great Christmas day and a happy holiday season. Stay safe! DiverseMentality 08:34, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You may be interested in commenting here. Thanks, Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 07:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about re-linking Touchdown in the article, my apologies. --HELLØ ŦHERE 22:22, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are we sure that "AftermathMusic.com" is a reliable site? I know the page we have for Aftermath lists two official websites, which I don't think is correct either way. I was just wondering, shouldn't we wait for another form of confirmation (i.e.- SixShot, MTV, etc.)? If you feel it's fine, I'll leave it alone, just thought I'd ask you for your opinion. --HELLØ ŦHERE 04:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I thought. Should I remove it then? --HELLØ ŦHERE 04:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'll let you make the final decision. --HELLØ ŦHERE 04:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i dont know how to cite or source things, bit the interview & mama i love you song are on his official website, allseanpaul.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by DuttyYo (talk • contribs) 12:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The current format is the appropriate format for all wikicharts. This is the same for every other album, billboard chart, single, etc. Your format has no borders, it is not clean, and it doesn't fit the format. I created the Love vs. Money article and I am trying to keep it consistent. Thanks Bmedick (talk) 04:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should we report this once again for continuous vandalism? --HELLØ ŦHERE 02:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm gonna report him then, because I agree. Lol. --HELLØ ŦHERE 03:20, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha. Well thank you for your support. --HELLØ ŦHERE 03:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case you were interested, I started a thread on the talk page how to improve the current article. Thanks, Do U(knome)? ^yes..._{or no} 04:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, I saw your reversion on Flo Rida's "R.O.O.T.S." album reviews that I had posted and I reverted it and changed the format of that link. About, the content, I wanted to reach out to you because I see you have created some other real nice Wiki pages that Wikipedia wouldn't have if it were not for editors like you, people that understand our rap community. I wanted to let you know that crediblemusicreviews.com is owned by Orange Karma Records, who also owns urbansouth.com, who do a ton of marketing and mixtape production and distribution for many hip-hop and r&b artists. In this case, they actually distributed DJ Kronik and Flo Rida's 10 year anniversary mixtape that led up to this album. Crediblemusicreviews.com is an important voice for mixtapes and other street LPs that dont get any popular exposure and they don't run ads or commercially exploit their reviews like just about EVERY other review site you will see on Wikipedia. I appreciate your work as an editor on Wikipedia and I am asking you to research the company and campaign on the side of the hip-hop community. If you still think it needs to be removed, I will not edit it again. Thank you sir, have an excellent day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.170.33 (talk) 01:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The two Lupe snippets that was written in the article had several sources. So why don't you stop removing that? You said they are just rumors, and yet you bring in the acronym that has a source but is still a rumor. You make no sense.69.121.129.97 (talk) 20:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you reverted my edit on the Rebirth album article. My reasons for editing were that the date of November 24th currently listed is without a source. The dates I edited in were all from reliable sources. I was just wondering what your reasons were for reverting the edit. Miles Blues (talk · contribs) 18:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading the same Cover that i uploaded on the young money page and deleting mine . Wow. Why'd do that??123.237.49.152 (talk) 15:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you seem to be good with reliable sources and whatnot, I was wondering if I could obtain your opinion. Do you believe "last.fm" is a reliable source? I haven't seen anything on this, but I thought I'd ask. Thank you and happy editing. --HELLØ ŦHERE 22:52, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's sourcing the length of a song. But I thought the only major sources for such were the actual single releases or the actual CD release. I may be wrong, but that's just what I thought. --HELLØ ŦHERE 23:11, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It actually isn't for the Rebirth page. I accidentally put my comment there, it's about a different page. I totally screwed that up. Lol. But the problem is, I don't think the song in question is a single. I could be mistaken, I think it's just a song that got released. --HELLØ ŦHERE 23:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well an anon keeps trying to use this as a source for the length of the song. Now, I haven't been to the link, because I don't use "Last", or any of that. So I'm just not sure if it's reliable at all. Lol. thanks friend. --HELLØ ŦHERE 23:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, my only deal with it is that sometimes they're off, sometimes it's a second or so, other times it's several minutes. Like the edited and non-edited versions of "Encore/Curtains Down". The edited version fades out before the shooting. So, like, that should be sourced. Know what I mean? But I'll take your side and put it, even without a source. Thanks again for your help. --HELLØ ŦHERE 23:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor commenting on the genre/subgenre issue of the article Straight Outta Compton is interested in advice for a resolution. Do u mind checking it out? (See Talk:Straight Outta Compton) Dan56 (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I FOUND THE SOURCE!!!!!!! Pac a 59 piru-blood here it says this clearly i added 2pac article in category:bloods--BubbleBabis (talk) 11:48, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look man, take these words as a friendly message.

• If the Crips killed Pac, they killed him because 1) he was a member of the Bloods and had allegedly murdered or caused damage in some of them Crips were he was in gang life 2) because Suge Knight was a Blood and his entourage had caused damage to some Crips, and they knew that Pac and Suge were in the same car and planned to kill them both.
• If Suge Knight himself organized the death of Pac, he did it because 1) he owed 14 millions to Pac from royalties 2) because Suge believed that Pac was planning to leave Death Row for his own label as Dre did 3) to get all the profits from the new album The Don Killuminati
• If Biggie organized the murder of Pac, he did it because 1) Pac was planning to establish "Death Row East" and take most of Bad Boy Records' artists 2) due to the suspicions he has about Pac having sex with biggies woman faith evans and her pregnancy 3( because biggie was threatened for his own life, thinking that Pac would kill him first 4) because of the Bad Boy-Death Row feud was increasing, and biggie and sean combs believed that Pac's death would bring an end to Death Row Records' increasing success
• If the police organized the murder, they did it because Pac was black activist and member of the Black Panthers, and his influences were turning his fans straight against the police

Also remember that: Many Crips were in biggies entourage

Plz reply--BubbleBabis (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In a Dutch TV channel on March 29, 2007, Snoop attacked Bill O'Rilley saying "Fuck Bill O'Reilly", and it's shown in many youtube videos. Should we add it to the Snoop Dogg article or the Bill O'Reilly article?--BubbleBabis (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found in ice cube article talk page that ice cube was a crip, then i found here that in his youth back in the 80s ice cube was no gangbanger no crip no blood--BubbleBabis (talk) 18:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I only produced one of those lists. The List of Roc-A-Fella Records artists was created in 2006. I'm not saying that the article stays the way it is, I'm just saying that you should check the history first before saying that I did something. Not trying to be mean, just reminding you so something like this won't happen. Also I created the Grand Hustle list in some weird way to drive off a vandal who kept creating lists for the same reason that you described, in this case Rcool35. Taylor Karras (talk) 07:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, believe me, I 100% agree with you, "Crack a Bottle" totally doesn't seem like it would appear on the album. Once again, believe me, I agree. But, going with policy, it only says MTV has stated it may not appear. But that doesn't mean it won't appear. Just saying, but honestly, as I said, I totally agree it most likely won't be on the album. Also, I understand that source doesn't state the name "Norman Bates Motel", but this source does. Hope this all helps. --HELLØ ŦHERE 21:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article confirms the name "Norman Bates Motel", albeit it's a very old article. --HELLØ ŦHERE 22:56, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The template that you reported does not appear to exist. Could you please clarify your report, thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Blessings in the Sky that fell upon me, so softly and so gently. It picked me up when I fell down when my knees seemed to give out. I was reaching out for help and didn’t know exactly where to start. So I started loving myself and I started to feel alot better. My cloudy skies were no longer hazy, and I started to see clearly again since the fog was gone. Now I take time to send the praises out to the Lord God above. Thank God I got Blessings in the Sky, So now that I am on the road to sucess and happiness i shall; Never stop forever running until I reach the very top, Never stop nor shall I ever quit until this princess gets exactly what she needs, That’s her life back to finally represent. Why you ask? Simply because I am a WOMAN of WAR…..and I am a WOMAN OF WISDOM: And that’s exactly who I am…. Who I shall forever be….. Thanking God everyday in each and every way……. Never got to be the Woman that I wanted to BE….. because others seemed to always get in the way of letting me, and I let others dictate my life for me!!!!!! so pay attention please….. If you want to be REAL you got to be real to YOURSELF first…. Than you got to represent others LAST! Why? If you don’t help yourself first, Who else is going to help you? None, because when you actually take a look at yourself than you can do anything you put your heart into. Never Stop being REAL always being the GREATEST!!!!!!! No one ever Paid attention to me except when I started paying Attention to myself. Thank God for waking me up today, Going to sleep than waking myself up….. Ah-choo……I said God BLESS you! Thank God for making me the Woman that I am and who I want to Be….. Successful and be all that I can BE!!!!!! I am a real Woman and this isn’t no one’s life except mines……. And I shall be all that I can be for ME, mines, and the rest of my family. The greatest gift of all is making me the Woman who I am and that’s REAL……. R= Real excited about living LIFE E= Emma A= amazing L= Laugh out Loud This means to be happy!!!!!!!!!!! Loving God never hurt anyone except make me Run……live life to the fullest…… And represent me…… Thank God for all the blessings in the Sky!!!!!![reply]

Hello SE, I was wondering if I could get your opinion on G-Unit Records. If you quickly browse the history, you will immediately see what I'm talking about. In your opinion, which revision is correct? --HELLØ ŦHERE 03:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, fellow Hip Hop WikiProject members!

This message is being sent out to let all listed members of the project know to re-add your name to the members list, as all current names on the list have been erased in order to find out who is still active on the project. WikiGuy86 (talk) 19:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TheBlueprint3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey King, just wondering if you could settle a dispute on the Aftermath Entertainment page. Thanks. --HELLØ ŦHERE 16:04, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we seemed to have resolved it, although the other editor seems to be having trouble following our guidelines and policies based on truth and not verifiability/reliable sources. --HELLØ ŦHERE 16:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SE King, Do not slander Wikipedia's database with personal removals. Controversies are also taken into account on this website. I have given sources and external links. There isnt any "personal" agenda that I have given towards the article On to the Next One. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjames4040 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mistakenly did not place the sources with the text last time. Sorry. The sources are now with the text. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjames4040 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Swingyarag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article T.I.'s seventh studio album has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball; see TenPoundHammer's Law

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated T.I.'s seventh studio album, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.I.'s seventh studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't have to get rid of the "King Muzik" page, you could've gave it another name. I know "King Muzik" is a shitty name for a album, but hell just about every article about him is saying that's the album name. Oh yeah, you need list his endorsements on his page, because I don't feel like it. Georgia Peachez (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Statlanta.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could that info not be merged to the artist's article for now? I still think it's best to wait until the album has a title, even with a smattering of info. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did copy and paste because I didn't feel like rewriting the damn article. I figured you would do that for me. So kiss my ass. I can do whatever I want. You don't own the damn site. You are getting on my damn nerves, you make a big deal out of little stuff. Georgia Peachez (talk) 16:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIRST OF ALL I DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK ME TO DO A DAMN THING! I KNOW WHAT THE HELL I'M DOING. JUST EDIT THE DAMN THING AND KEEP IT MOVING. DON'T BE ADDING LITTLE MESSAGES TOWARDS ME IN THE EDIT SUMMARY. Georgia Peachez (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have tagged File:LoseMyMind.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 05:20, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am I the only one who thinks T.I.'s Discography page is getting a bit too crowded???

.....Oh, i'm sorry for snapping like that earlier. I was having one of my "female" days. Georgia Peachez (talk) 13:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yesssss..the guest appearance section is killing it. At first it was just a list in ABC order, now somebody went and added a table. I added that soundtrack section back when I was like 15, now I look at it now, it looks.........wrong. I can't really put my finger on it. lol Georgia Peachez (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have no grounds to remove that material. The source is the same one being used to talk about him opening his house to Katrina victims. If it's reliable enough for that, it's reliable for the rest.....and the part about her taking him to court is in the source. You need to read it. You can't just remove it because you don't like it. Discuss it, fine, but removing it without comment is wrong. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:49, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• It clearly had a source listed. So why would you remove it twice without even bothering to look at the source? You use a grammar complaint to ignore the presence of a reliable source? That makes no sense. And it wasn't really a "new thought". He "opened his house" and his ex took the news accounts of that and used them to expose his dishonesty. They're very connected.Niteshift36 (talk) 14:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We may not see eye 2 eye on certain things but i need help expanding the 2010 in hip hop music page it is too strengous to do alone. Will u help by epanding it?? STATicVerseatide (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:STATicVerseatide) 07:26, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Girl55555 appears to have received a level 4 (next time you vandalise you will be blocked") warning in 2007; two and a half years ago. This did not lead to a block. Further warnings were issued in 2008 (level 3) and in May last year. Recently they've made 4 edits, none of which appear to be vandalism and no warnings have been issued, by you or anyone else. Your AIV report says "Has been told multiple times to stop, obviously doesn't listen" which appears a little more current than a year ago. So I'm wondering - did you report the right editor there? Tonywalton ^Talk 00:04, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't start with me today. That person keeps removing stuff saying T.I. is not just black. I never heard any fuckery from Tip saying he's mixed with Native American, and if he is, there should be an article where it mentions such thing. What sense does that make with her/him/it keeps removing the african american category and tells us to cite it when he looks well..black? You don't need to cite that the sky is blue, that's all i'm saying. Georgia Peachez (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:TheAdventuresofBobbyRay.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm just wondering if you will be addressing the issues in the GAN Review? Thanks. -- S Masters (talk) 05:15, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paper Trail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Paper Trail for eventual comments about the article. Well done! S Masters (talk) 04:41, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if www.2dopeboyz.com is considrined a relible source because i have never heard of the site but its been used in hip hop articles as refrences. STAT- Verse 23:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So if a better source is avialble i should use that source? STAT- Verse 00:42, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dont worry about bad sources from me 99.9% of the time I use HipHopDX.com as a source. STAT- Verse 00:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I have deprotected Thug Motivation 103. See how requested move goes. It looks like a reasonable number of refs now support the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of this recent created article? STAT- Verse 01:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rap-Up is a blog, and even the blog entry did not say that it's the album cover, it's just fan-made promo art. When Shady-Aftermath-Interscope releases the actual cover, then you may upload it. In the meantime, please take a moment to check Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. (note "blogs are not reliable sources"). Thanks, Tom Danson (talk) 19:39, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

could u comment at the AfD for Gangsta Grillz: The Album (Vol. 3) at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangsta Grillz: The Album (Vol. 3). STAT- Verse 03:41, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Recoverycover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Taylor Karras (talk | contribs | Rcool35) 05:46, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I started a discussion on the talk page about the image that was added to 50 Cent's article with an explanation on how it is him. Could you please take a look to make sure? If you have any questions, please let me know. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those two images are from slightly different views, so the nose doesn't look exactly the same at that angle and light. I think we can agree that people change and don't look the same in every photograph, even just in a few years time. It took a lot of convincing for me to believe that was him in the recent weight loss images for the new film role, but by studying comparison images, it's helpful to tell. Are you able to see the similar marks on his face? The same marks can even be seen in the current main infobox image as well. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:31, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GotYourBack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:29, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:IMadeIt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:4life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tha Carter IV/version 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WeAreYoungMoney.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:We Global.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For cleaning up Detox_(Dr._Dre_album) Singles and Production section. This cleanup required a lot of diligence and work considering the mess it was! Thanks! ChadH (talk) 23:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Deathofautotune.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Man, I think You should update T.I. discography, like you make to others artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.14 (talk) 02:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:K.O.D.cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]