User talk:Suslindisambiguator

Hi Suslin, you can check the category talk pages (I suspect you are duplicating some of my effort) where I have already listed the speakers upto 1912. The format in the ICM list is odd and it took me quite a while to figure out some of the names. Solomon7968 18:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Solomon7968 62.240.62.182 (talk) 07:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

I noticed your recent edit to Leach Botanical Garden does not have an edit summary. While your contributions are helpful, not providing an edit summary creates extra work for editors reviewing recent changes, an article's history, your editing history, etc. in determining whether your edit is likely vandalism or helpful. Please help collaborate. You were reminded about no edit summaries in 2010. If you continue, you are editing disruptively.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —EncMstr (talk) 16:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neot Kedumim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Menorah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your last comments at David Eppstein's talk page. Please note that while you do decent work here, your peculiar approach to signing is hindrance to effective communication. You are long enough here to know to use the four tildes ~~~~ for signing.

Btw don't know whether you noticed it or not but both of us made the last edit to the speakers list at 23:20! Thankfully I avoided an edit-conflict. Solomon7968 02:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning (Redacted)

KoshVorlon, this seems to be some sort of mistake. Can you recheck please? Solomon7968 20:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck -- and yes it is a mistake! My bad ! KoshVorlon 20:33, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Takashi Ono (mathematician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institute of Advanced Study. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have been using the {{translated page}} template for some articles you create (most of them translated from their German counterparts made by Claude J). While that is ok for our attribution/licensing requirements, I have some small concerns:

• Can you consider using the edit summary, say, translated from the German version, in the first edit/the edit in which the enWP articles get created? Most of our editors will find that more useful while looking in page history.
• The pages you create are not getting linked via Wikidata. This is actually more serious than my first point. We are already lagging behind deWP in ICM speakers/AMS fellows (mostly again due to the efforts of Claude J). The pages should be linked to Wikidata by following the "Edit links" option in the bottom-left of any page. Solomon7968 15:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for what you did at Shinzo Watanabe, just as I expected . I wrote a note at the list article talk page (about syntax, grammar etc.) and implemented that at Shinzo Watanabe (check the most recent edit). The goal is to link using the User:Edward/Find link tool. Please do notice. Solomon7968 02:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Shinzo Watanabe, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:23, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arno Kuijlaars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catholic University of Leuven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see what you are trying to do with this edit but it breaks the harv linkage to the full reference. I will leave you to fix the problem. Keith D (talk) 14:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you recently made an edit to Francisque Sarcey in which you included In which you enter

• *{{EB1911|Sarcey, Francisque|volume=24|page=208}}

Which due to recent changes produces errors if an unnamed parameter is used. This is how all the standard citation templates behave, so it makes scence to pass the content of unnamed parameters on to {{cite encyclopaedia}} (around which this template wraps). Instead of using a unamed parameter (which is not and has not been documented for many years) use the named parameter wstitile= (which has been documented for many years) along with title= for articles not on Wikisource.

Without wstitile=

•  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 24 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 208. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

With wstitile=

•  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Sarcey, Francisque". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 24 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 208.

BTW I made this edit on a phone. It would be helpful if you archived the older content of your talk page (see help:archiving).

--PBS (talk) 12:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Fathi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Herman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Kogut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kenneth Wilson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franco Brezzi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maurice Heins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Function theory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexey Parshin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shafarevich conjecture. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eberhard Freitag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Function theory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please use reviews published by high quality sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:42, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hans Goldmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rector. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would be good to get images like this [1] placed right within Wikipedia articles. Do you know if you can get them released under an open license (CC BY SA)? Happy to help if needed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alfred Vogt

added a link pointing to Leopoldina

Barrie R. Jones

added a link pointing to Victoria College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stewart Ranken Douglas

added links pointing to Henry Dale and St Mary's Hospital

William Bulloch (bacteriologist)

added a link pointing to Medical Research Council

Willy Marckwald

added a link pointing to Promotion

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edgar Hartley Kettle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Mary's Hospital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marmaduke Alexander Lawson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durham County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re this: is a 105-year old reference book really a useful external link? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:32, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your many expansions of the occurrences of the [Cite ]EB1911 template. It's important to identify the right source article, and every bit helps. Some comments though:

• When there's a title parameter with a URL, and it's replaced with a wstitle, it's conventional to remove the URL parameter. It's not visible in the resulting text and has very little value in the source.
• This resulted in an invalid sentence. Best to check the preview first.
• In general, since you are presumably referring to the wikisource entry, can you add the volume= and page= or pages= parameter, for completeness?

Thanks again; we're just striving for consistency and completeness. Some more in-depth edits are underway to specifically footnote those sentences that are verbatim copies of EB1911 (using inline ref or {{sfn}} tags), but that is a slow process and your complementary breadth-first updates are welcome.David Brooks (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Thomas Botfield (geologist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Choinierenate (talk) 14:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Archibald Paton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ragusa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for all you work on EB1911 articles. Langston-lemon (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this edit, but if the page does not have inline citations to EB1911, it would help the project if you would run earwig on such pages: like this and add them if needed. If not then convert the {{EB1911}} into {{Cite EB1911}}. If this brief explanation is not clear then please feel free to leave a request for clarification on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Encyclopaedia Britannica -- PBS (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An example: Earwig comparison and my edit to add citations. -- PBS (talk) 16:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know you've done great work before on helping to drastically reduce the number of pages in the "Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica with no article parameter".

There's another one: "Category:Articles incorporating text from the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia with no article parameter" (currently 1665 pages and declining) that needs work and I've started from "A". If you feel so inclined, your input would be appreciated! There's a number of advantages working on articles in this category compared the EB1911 category; all the articles for the CE13 have been created already in Wikisource and the personal articles are "firstname lastname" format which matches Wikipedia. Typically, I've been replacing the use of {{Catholic}} with {{Catholic Encyclopedia |wstitle= |volume=1 |first=|last=}} and filling in the parameters. Thanks in advance. DivermanAU (talk) 05:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roberto Conti (mathematician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You would find it useful to learn the markup language, similar to mathematical notation in LaTeX, that Wikipedia uses. You wrote:

i) ${\displaystyle Prob}$ ({${\displaystyle \int _{0}^{t}f(W_{s})\,ds}$ < ∞,  for all t ≥ 0})   >  0

I changed that to this:

(i) ${\displaystyle P\left(\int _{0}^{t}f(W_{s})\,ds<\infty ,{\text{ for all }}t\geq 0\right)>0}$0}"/>

Similarly, you wrote:

let ${\displaystyle F}$ = (${\displaystyle {\mathcal {F_{t}}}}$)_t≥0 be an increasing family

and I changed that to this:

let ${\displaystyle F=({\mathcal {F}}_{t})_{t\geq 0}}$ be an increasing family

Michael Hardy (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have put your new article about Doob's theorem on Deletion because it is similar to Doob's martingale convergence theorems LCGVM (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doob's martingale convergence theorems, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martingale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Frederick Blake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lenton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.64% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities this month: WiR Loves Pride Singers and Songwriters Women in GLAM Geofocus: Russia/USSR #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 11:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just thought I'd give you a quick update on this category. It's now down into double digits, 97 at time of writing; at the start of last year it was 4,682. Thanks again for the great work you did in helping to reduce this number. regards, DivermanAU (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Albert Marden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Epstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
2. Then click on "templates",
3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
4. If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help with what I started in my edit to Shmuel Friedland? Article titles in quote, journal titles and book titles in italics. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:06, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia needs articles for Sue Dan Lin-Chao, Maria Isabel Colombo, Luisa Lina Villa, & Erika L. Pearce. English translations are needed for Britta Nestler, Irmgard Sinning [de] & Ulla Bonas [de]. Suslindisambiguator (talk) 28 May 2019

I had an article on William Kantor at AfC, and crossed wires with your translation. I'd also looked at the German article, so my draft is not so far away from your translation. I took another pass, and made it match what you have a little more closely. The main differences at this point are

• formatting (sections, infobox, significant pubs broken into books and articles)
• I left out the Oberwolfach and Ohio State conference organization, which don't seem so notable to me.
• I have a somewhat different list of significant pubs, which I chose IIRC by looking at citation counts.
• I left out the disambiguation note at the end about Seligmann Kantor. Now that I look at this, it should probably be handled by a hatnote, which I just added :-).
• I have more references.

Is there anything there that you don't like? Would you mind if I copied most of my draft over?

I probably should've just moved my draft to mainspace myself, but I'm a bit new here. I appreciate your work in translating articles, particularly the math bios! Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding so quickly (on my own talk page)! I brought the merged draft over to William Kantor, with a redirect on the draftspace. Take a look and make sure that you're happy with it. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 11:25, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Kari Astala, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kazuya Kato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Takeshi Saito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator, Thanks for being so responsive in finding a citation the infobox fact at Walter Prescott Webb. However, I am getting a message that the web site is not secure when I link to the article cited. Unfortunately, I don't know what the course of action should be, other than asking for help. Best, Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Xuhua He, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brittonia (journal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Xuhua He".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Suslindisambiguator,

I am impressed with the enormous amount of editing you did for Wikipedia. Allow me to point out an error (which is probably one of several of the same type), the source of which is the German Wikipedia, and whose relevant pages were translated by you.

The ICM 1962 in Stockholm allowed its participants to make what was called a `short contribution’. There were about 700 of those and while the names and titles are mentioned in the Proceedings, the contributions themselves do no not appear there. It is likely that this was meant to make it easy for participants to justify their expenses at home, but unlike having been invited as a speaker, this is not the kind of thing that deserves mention in the biography of a mathematician.

This kind of error is for example made in the lemma on Tonny A. Springer, where it says:

"In 1962 he was an invited speaker at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Stockholm (with lecture on Twisted composition algebras) and in 2006 at Madrid (with lecture on Some results on compactifications of semisimple groups)."

His case is remarkable, for he was indeed an invited speaker at the ICM in Madrid (at the age of 80!), but in Stockholm he merely made a short contribution. I do not want to make such changes myself (I am sure you have a better overview).

Similarly, the lemma on Frans Oort incorrectly asserts:

"In 1962 Oort was an Invited Speaker with talk Multiple algebraic curves at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Stockholm."

Since you were involved the editing of the ICM speaker list, I take it that there is no need for me to link you to the official ICM site. Beauxartisan (talk) 14:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add links to Google Books from book citations. Instead, add the ISBN. Did you know that if you click the ISBN you can then choose to view the book on Google Books, various Amazon sites, and other places. For example ISBN 978-0393652673. Try it. Linking to Google books indicates a preference which Wikipedia doesn't have. Adding ISBNs is the preference free way to allow interested readers to find more information about the book, on Amazon rather than Google if that's what they prefer. The only time a link to Google Books is appropriate is for old books which don't have an ISBN. Even then, Internet Archive is preferred if the book is available there. Thanks you. Skyerise (talk) 12:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Suslindisambiguator,

The surname of Wilberd van der Kallen is not Kallen. That is an entirely different family. See also

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tussenvoegsel

It may be the case that in the Netherlands it is acceptable to write

Kallen, Wilberd van der (1993),

but nowadays that is not the international convention. It must be

van der Kallen, Wilberd

Yours, Wilberdka (talk) 07:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flower of the Dust 38.34.90.249 (talk) 09:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC) If the question means, "Is Suslindisambiguator the same as the Wikipedia editor Darorcilmir, who created the page Kalanchoe pumila (the flower dust plant)?", then the answer is "No." "Flower of the Dust" reminds me of a stanza from Witter Bynner:[reply]
Though a flower of the dust
   Droop and die,
Who'll be moody with mistrust?
   You? . . . I?
https://books.google.com/books?id=XGJLAAAAMAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA61
As of Nov. 14, 2021 C.E., Darorcilmir is credited with about 30,740 Wikipedia edits. The Daror depression is located S. of the Cal Miskaat and about 24 km E. of the road from Karin to Ganda.
https://www.mindat.org/feature-61279.html
https://www.mindat.org/feature-53870.html Suslindisambiguator (talk)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arkady Migdal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nauka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can not view this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u36-iKApko — Preceding unsigned comment added by Werner Fink (talk • contribs) 14:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ Werner Fink: Thanks for alerting me about this video, which was taken private after I added the link for it. I commented out that particular link, and replaced it with a link to a 2019 YouTube video. Suslindisambiguator (talk)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Drummond Ellis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Wang algebra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uricdivine^TalkToMe 13:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Wang algebra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uricdivine^TalkToMe 13:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Suslindisambiguator,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Walter M. Nielson for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xx236 (talk) 09:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for creating Willis A. Wood. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for your contributions!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 01:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruxton: Primefac recently deleted on the grounds of copyright deletion about 23 blockquotes that I added. I can understand that the blockquotes might violate Wikipedia standards for blockquotes — but I am still baffled how any reasonable person might think that the blockquotes are copyright violations. Consider Wikiquote — there are vast numbers of blockquotes in Wikiquote that are nearer to copyright violation than the blockquotes that Primefac deleted. Furthermore, I think that the offending articles should have been moved to draft space instead of having the blockquotes deleted and also blocking the blockquotes from open review. What is your opinion on this? Suslindisambiguator (talk) 10:58, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for creating Richard Chandler Alexander Prior. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on these academic bio articles... keep up the good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for creating House of the Good Samaritan. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for creating Stuart Mudd. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, American Association for the History of Nursing, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Melvin I. Simon. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Sandra Herbert. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on John Colhoun (plant pathologist). User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Great job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 17:52, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Louise Riofrio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a joke. Not a single publication is peer reviewed, this person has no presence in science except as a self-promotion sideshow

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Riofrio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Riofrio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kj cheetham (talk) 19:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praseodymium-141 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still largely relies on primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Association for the History of Nursing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

¹⁴¹Pr {^contribs/_{Best page}} 07:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 141Pr {contribs/Best page} 07:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Anthony P. J. Trinci is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Martin Beazor Ellis is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	he Wonderful Mr Willughby: The First True Ornithologist is a very good page. Great work! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page M. Daria Haust, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:42, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Roberta Bondar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Robert James Lee, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I appreciate your interest in the article A.L Bacharach - but not entirely sure why it was necessary to move it to Alfred Louis Bacharach. I can find no significant reference to the German A.L. Bacharach, certainly none in Wikipedia. As the English A.L Bacharach wrote under that name, and not his full name, I feel that perhaps it would have been better to leave it where it was.(talk)

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Marcel Froissart. User:Reading Beans, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thanks for creating!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Reading Beans}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Reading Beans (talk) 19:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:American Association for the History of Nursing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Association for the History of Nursing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on David G. Gee. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 14:51, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Richard G. Gordon. User:Timothytyy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Timothytyy}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Timothytyy (talk) 13:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Whitney Allen House. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:00, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on John B. Johnson House. CactiStaccingCrane, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Amazing article! Kudos

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CactiStaccingCrane}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 14:06, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator, I just wanted to say that I'm impressed and inspired by the mathematician biography pages you create. Keep on keeping on! GanzKnusper (talk) 08:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Anne Innis Dagg, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Erwin N. Hiebert. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Expertly constructed and a well-warranted page.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 04:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suslindisambiguator,

Thank you for creating Erwin N. Hiebert.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

As an APS Fellow he is notable. However, large parts of the page are unsourced. There is a strong possibility that someone will delete everything that is unsourced. Please repair this. Also, the format is different from normal, please revise so it is more readable including things like a scientist infobox and picture.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 05:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on Aaron C. Waters! Happy editing! :) —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 16:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blakiston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Roger Kenneth French. Another editor, Lightburst, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checking the edit history, it seems that you created the page for [Howard Wright Alexander]. I was wondering if you'd have any more info about him? Wizard of the World Wide Web (talk) 03:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Arkady Tseytlin. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please reduce the number of papers to at most ten

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:59, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John William Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Institute of Acoustics.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for all your work on creating academic biographies. These are an important, and often-over looked area when compared to other topics on Wikipedia.

However, you must always keep in mind both copyright and Wikipedia's own non-free content guidelines. These can be hard to understand, so feel free to ask me any questions you may have. Wikipedia's rules about non-free content are strict - in many ways, even stricter than copyright law itself. However, it is important that we all comply with these guidelines.

1. When translating articles from other language Wikipedias, we must always follow the instructions at this page. From now on, whenver you translate an article, you must always insert a link to the original source of your text in the edit summary. For example, if you translated a German Wikipedia article to a new Wikipedia page, you should place the following text into your edit summary.

Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:de:Exact name of German article]]; see its history for attribution.

If you ever forget, you can still meet this attribution requirement by following the instructions at WP:RIA.

2. You may not copy-paste external sources into your sandbox. Copyrighted content ins not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia- that includes your sandbox. If you want to copy-paste an external source so you don't loose it, you can use a word processor on your own computer.

3. You may not closely paraphrase or plagiarise content from your source when you are writing a Wikipedia article. You may only take facts, not creative language. This can be hard to figure out. For now, please take this course. It was made by the Wikimedia Foundation for students, but it is a well-written course that you would learn a lot from.

Thank you for reading this. Please let me know if you have any questions, or ask at the WP:TEAHOUSE. It's billed as a help desk for inexperienced editors, but the editors there can answer questions from anybody. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have an open CCI, was that not enough for you to understand that you can't violate copyright? We very likely may have to expand the CCI to include your current contributions. I'm sorry but, until you show us that you really understand what GreenLipstickLesbian has outlined above, I don't think you should be editing. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 14:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Given that I just had to revdel a a copyvio, all contributions need to be examined. -- Whpq (talk) 21:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq, I had a feeling when I warned them last month that they still didn't understand copyright. Suslindisambiguator, we've given you chances to stop and try to fix what you're doing wrong, and you've showed us again that you clearly don't understand. I'm sorry but until your CCI is finished, I don't think you should be unblocked. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 21:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Subir Sarkar. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The first long paragraph on his career cites as a source his own CV. We need to have other, independent sources. For instance, a link to his PhD, prior announcements of his appointments etc. In principle the whole 1st paragraph of his career could be deleted as unverified.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Frederick Ernest King. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It is a bit wordy, and probably should be trimmed. Please add a scientist infobox.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 08:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator. Thank you for your work on Robert E. Kohler. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add sources to the 3rd paragraph or it may be removed

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Whpq (talk) 21:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You already have a CCI investigation open, and now you've added copyrighted material when creating Frances K. Hutchinson Medal. -- Whpq (talk) 21:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, all accusations of copyright violation against wikipedia edits that I have made are incorrect. It seems to me that the lists of recipients and citations (although perhaps I should have used quotation marks for the citations) that I used for the Frances K. Hutchinson Medal are well within the standards of fair use. Are there any lawyers among Wikipedia editors that can give their opinions? https://copyrightalliance.org/faqs/what-is-fair-use/Suslindisambiguator (talk)

I'm interested on knowing why you believe that the content you copy and pasted from the website is "fair use". Even then, you have a history of copyvios. Your intent is obviously to copy and paste content from the website into the article whether the content falls under "fair use" or not. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 22:48, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the following: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Stephen_King . The number of words copied from Stephen King does not seem to me to greatly different from the number of words copied in the Frances K. Hutchinson Medal citations. Furthermore, the citations seem to me to have negligible commercial value. Is copying a list of prize winners "copyright violation"? Why should copying a list of brief award citations be any different than copying a list of Nobel Prize winners or Academy Award winners? Suslindisambiguator (talk)

Wikiquote is not the English Wikipedia so is not really relevant. What is relevant that Wikipedia goes by a stricter standard than fair use. Exceptions for the use of copyrighted material is governed by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Simply putting quotation marks around all of the copied content would not be acceptable either. -- Whpq (talk) 01:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"What is relevant that Wikipedia goes by a stricter standard than fair use." Language should not be abused. Instead of accusing me of "violatingg copyright law", I should be accused of "violating Wikipedia policy for copying material from non-Wikipedia websites". Question for Whpg — do you have any legal training whatsoever? Suslindisambiguator (talk)

Wikipedia is not a court of law so my legal education is not relevant. "Copyright violation" is a term used on Wikiedpia to refer to non-compliance with copyright policy, and is generally used this way in dicussions here. You've made you objection to the owrding knwn here, but that does not negate the fact that your edits are no in compliance with policy. -- Whpq (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I say: Copyright violation is fundamentally a legal term — I object to Wikipedia editors who define words according to their own subjective standards. "Copying", "plagiarism", and "copyright violation" have specific meanings, although there are similarities in their meanings. I think I now understand Wikipedia policy. Some of my edits involve more copying than the standard Wikipedia policy — but it probably only about 1% of the 2000+ articles under the "Suslindisambiguator" aegis. Suslindisambiguator (talk)

The article Frances K. Hutchinson Medal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyvio

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Electrou (formerly Susbush) (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Electrou: Ask Whpq about Copyvio question. Suslindisambiguator (talk)