User talk:Rastongi

Hello, Rastongi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 19:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rastongi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Not sure my ID was blocked

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:47, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't change the titles used in sources to something they aren't. If a source is used, you cite it correctly and accurately. Your edits [1] and [2] did exactly that. I can understand if you don't agree with what the title says but you cannot change it. Simply put, you are pushing your POV in a subtle way into the article. Per NPOV, you cannot do that. If you continue to do so, I will ask for an administrator to review this. 65.197.19.244 (talk) 20:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Based on technical evidence from the checkuser tool and your editing patterns, you have been blocked for one week for abusing multiple accounts. The sockpuppet accounts have all been blocked indefinitely. Please take this time to review our policies and guidelines. --Versageek 21:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]