User talk:Pokai

It's not usual to completely blank your talk page, including the welcome message you were given. Old messages will not disappear completely (they will always be findable in the page history), but it means that other editors are likely to waste time giving advice you have already been given. Many editors set up an automatic archiving for their talk page, which moves old messages after a set time and keeps them tidily. It's pretty insulting to those who have written on your talk page that you consider all their helpful advice to be "trash". PamD 08:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Lack of notability" is not a valid reason for CSD. Please read the criteria carefully and do not waste other people's time making incorrect nominations. I think you have already been advised about this, so I call this out as disruptive editing. If you continue to edit so carelessly you may find yourself blocked eventually. PamD 08:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you have been told already: see here. Please read and follow the advice you are given, rather than making more mistakes. Thanks. PamD 08:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Syed Gaji Shah, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not nominate for CSD unless the article fits one of the CSD criteria. Slow down and read the rules. PamD 08:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In a short stub where every word of the content is sourced to an extremely reliable source, there is no need to add {{refimprove}}. Are you perhaps more interested in improving your own edit count? Please don't add tags unnecessarily. PamD 09:26, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand {{link rot}} would have been an appropriate tage to add, as the source is a bare URL, and it had a red-linked category (ie in this case wrongly guessed) which could usefully have been fixed. PamD 09:33, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1."Sangsad Television"
Actual name is Sangsad Bangladesh Television (display show) and Sangsad Bangladesh (logo show). I donot no why you change.

2.Ananda TV
That channel have Bengali wiki page (https://bn.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A6%86%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A6_%E0%A6%9F%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%AD%E0%A6%BF) but not in English.so i creating that.But you delete that. why?

3.Atn bangla have 'atn bangla uk' tv channel and it is a another channel, not same.

4.Tejgaon Circle Upazila is not a upazila. it is a circle. BD govt defunct that. now it is part of city corp.

SO why you change that? please undo that 4 topic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Md Moniruzzaman Emon (talk • contribs) 11:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All the editing are done under the policies of Wikipedia. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 12:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If any edit it improper then it will automatically revert by a bot or by an editor Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

comment: No 3. Its basically the same. I don't recommend to create a page for it, just add info into the main artcle. No 4. It's true. No comment/objection for other two. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 16:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomoskar dada. Your userpage says your form Kolkata. If your are bengali, Please help Bangla Wikipedia. There are 30 koti Bengali but only very few (10-15) contibute in Bangla. Bengali is the 6th most spoken language but in wiki, we are 72th and only have 78 hajar article, while for example english wiki have 5.9 million. You can help by translating articles from english wikipedia to Bangla.

In mobile you can use Ridmik keyboard or Gboard to write Bangla. You don't have to learn anything, both key board have a option called avro. so, if you want to write for example আপনি কেমন আছেন?, you will need to type "aponi kemon achen?" and keyboard will convert that into Bengali text. Please help Bangla Wikipedia. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user, I am from Kolkata but since my childhood I don't use to live in Kolkata, I only lived in the outside states. I know a little bit of Bangla which I use for only spoken communication. Thank you so much. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 04:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Ok. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was wrong. You can add [[:Category:American rappers]] with a colon to stop it operating on the draft, or put a category commented out, for info, but drafts shouldn't be appearing in category listings. PamD 11:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you so much for updating my knowledge. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 11:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sangsad Television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rampura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your great contribution, specially for Army Public School Dinjan. Bharat Ki Jai (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, this is a great Christmas gift for me.Pokai (talk) 08:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Žarko Rakčević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:40, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the link Pokai (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Priyanka Reddy Rape Case. Since you had some involvement with the Priyanka Reddy Rape Case redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:27, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you recently removed content from National Register of Citizens for Assam without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the content should be removable, now it's your decision Pokai (talk) 12:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read MOS:OVERLINK and stop linking commonly-understood words like "American" as you did here. Thanks. PamD 23:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okk Pokaiᗙ Happy New Year! 03:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What further categories do you think are needed here? He has birth and death, and two defining categories for what he is notable for. It might be possible to add a "People from xxx" category, but that really isn't necessary: if you think it's needed, you could add it yourself instead of tagging the article to suggest that someone else needs to do so. Please don't tag articles unnecessarily. PamD 12:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And also here: the article has just one category, but it's a very exact one and is the child category of everything else which might be appropriate. What other categories do you think it needs? There is no rule to say that just one category is not enough. Please don't add that tag unless you can think of other appropriate categories: if you can do so, please consider adding them yourself. Thanks. PamD 12:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Similar question regarding Roggwil-Berg railway station. It's categorized by owner (Südostbahn), geographic location (Thurgau), and structure type (railway station). What categories do you think are missing, given the available information in the article? Mackensen (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANd here. Please stop wasting everyone's time by adding irrelevant tags. PamD 17:33, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nature Park of India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If an article is about a living person and has no sources, you should use the specific template{{Prod blp}} - always "subst"ing it, so you type: {{subst:Prod blp}}. Thanks. PamD 00:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Pokaiᗙ Happy New Year! 18:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When an article like Bahram al-Armani has plenty of sources but has just not specified any of them as references, it's better to use {{no footnotes}} rather than {{unreferenced}} as it makes clearer what the problem is. Thanks. PamD 00:18, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tanveer Ashraf Bhatti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tanveer Ashraf Bhatti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rajeshwar Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rajeshwar Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pokai. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Incredible India (movie) 2, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ek Mahanayak: Dr. B. R. Ambedkar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:49, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kamlesh Patel. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamlesh Patel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kamlesh Patel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required declarations.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kamlesh Patel. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kamlesh Patel (dancer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Moved into article space without AFC review after being declined. Written to praise the subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Does not satisfy general notability or entertainment notability in its current state.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The 23 December Celebration requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Indian wikis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Indian wikis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Incredible India (movie) 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarika Bahroliya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ICCECE International Conference 2020".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article NUJS International Model United Nations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Asia Youth International Model United Nations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable conference.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Asia Youth International Model United Nations, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guffutherider".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Air Force Station Jodhpur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Fridays For Future Virtual, is not suitable as written to remain published. Obviously, you are working on it, but right now it's got quite a few errors in it. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Asia Youth International Model United Nations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tayi Arajakate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 16:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Narendra Modi that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 07:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The 23 December Celebration, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asia Youth International Model United Nations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC) (talk page watcher): @Liz: On the briefest of glances this look like a possible viable article subject so I've requested a WP:REFUND. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The 23 December Celebration".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Asia Youth International Model United Nations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:21, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Rajeshwer Singh, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajeshwer Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajeshwer Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

331dot (talk) 08:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, V-Awards, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, let me clear this honestly, neither it's a case of WP:UPE nor it's WP:COI. I've attended two ceremonies of this award function and I true believe that there should be a page on Wikipedia about them as it's notable initiative by United Nations India and Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Government of India, it's all what is true. Pokai (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on UN India Yuwaah Advocates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A00:23EE:2048:8306:E427:74FF:FE7E:FC59 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 UPSC Same Roll Scandal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 UPSC Same Roll Scandal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Doom Patrol (talk) 09:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:V-Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pokai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "V-Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 19:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Kolkata building collapse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Kolkata building collapse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sohom (talk) 19:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Shaunak Chakraborty per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shaunak Chakraborty. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Army Public School, Jodhpur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army Public School, Jodhpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Newhaven lad (talk) 17:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]