User talk:Po Mieczu

Hello, Po Mieczu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ravensbrück concentration camp have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 16:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stanisław Julian Ignacy Ostroróg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please add your sources to Józef Gawlina? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 14:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mostyska, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Persian and Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Polish people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corpus Christi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent additions to Lillie Bridge Depot. I have moved the 2018 info about Ashfield House to the redevelopment section, rather than leaving it in 1907, and have added fact templates to some of it, as the text was not supported by the existing references. Please can you add your sources for the changes you have made. Bob1960evens (talk) 23:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Bob, done. Incidentally, the Ashfield mock-up station is actually very recent and has its own article here, West Ashfield tube station.--Po Mieczu (talk) 00:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In the light of the above, I have rejigged the tense of that bit a little. I also found a bit more about the Piccadilly line offices on the English Heritage site. Cheers. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poles in France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Czartoryski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Count Xavier Branicki, Po Mieczu!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A useful addition to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wanda Gertz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page People's Militia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Halszka Wasilewska. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 19:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamara Tchinarova, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Halszka Wasilewska, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 23:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kazimierz Poniatowski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Royal Army

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited January Uprising, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bismarck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Through for now it still stays at C-class, since B-class for WP:POLAND requires full density for inline refs. But it reads better now! Thanks for helping out! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. I'd encourage you to nominate it at WP:GAN for a GA-level review! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wanda Wasilewska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish Communist Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Divine Mercy College, Po Mieczu!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Evangelical is a horrible translation of "evangelisch", but Evangelical Lutheran is worse, because in Germany, many are United. I prefer Protestant. However, the German church gave itself the misleading English name, - what can we do? If you have too much time study the many futile discussions on the article talk. I have better things to do ) ----Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gerda Arendt. Nice to hear from you! I so agree, we have other fish to fry. I only did it because I corrected the Evangelical Cemetery, Vilnius. I suppose they reverted that too. I haven't had time to look. Best wishes, --Po Mieczu (talk) 17:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Vilnius, things seem to be different, and "Lutheran" might be the term to use, vs. Calvinists. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:59, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited German minority in Poland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashubian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Szlachta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tartar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you've asked about [1] edit by User:Sphilbrick. It would be best to ask him (hence I pinged him) but I assume he has concerns over some content that might have been copied from that page? See WP:COPYPASTE. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. I think it's sorted. The problem arose because I had used slightly altered (not copypaste) material from another Wikipedia article, Polish Hunting Dog which turned out to have an extant copyright violation in its History section, not picked up since 2007! Obviously, I had no idea it was so. I explained this to who told me about "rollback" which had resulted in the reverting of all the many edits that followed. I have re-edited the "offending" section and reverted the revert. I have left it to User:Sphilbrick to deal with the old violation in the dog article. Kind regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 03:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Po Mieczu, Yes I believe this is sorted out now. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Sphilbrick for the message and pushing me up the learning curve. Hmm., more vigilance in future. --Po Mieczu (talk) 00:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the Szlachta article... Took article to higher level... - Exxess (talk) 06:43, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your appreciation, Exxess. I believe we are but half-way to a decent article, so there is more to be done! Best wishes, --Po Mieczu (talk) 13:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stefan Kieniewicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iberian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

In relation to historic states in the Holy Roman Empire, there are a number of articles titled, e.g. Margravate of Meissen and then others titled, e,g. Margraviate of Brandenburg. The OED lists "Margravate" as the territory ruled by a Margrave. This is the historical and primary form in English of the German translation. If there is already an established word, Margravate, is it not confusing to introduce another expression, "Margraviate" for the same territorial definition by adding an "i", making it a secondary form? Moreover, in the case of Brandenburg, there is a map that refers to the "Margravate of Brandenburg", even though the article is called as above. The secondary form appears to stem from the adjective, "Margravial" and seems to be an unnecessary Neologism.

I would like to suggest that in the interests of uniformity and precision the original English form of "Margravate" be applied throughout on en.wikipedia. Where can we discuss this? Thank you. --Po Mieczu (talk) 00:57, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd probably start by asking at the talk page for the Manual of Style, WT:MOS.331dot (talk) 01:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, 331dot (talk). Done. --Po Mieczu (talk) 02:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Decimus Burton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Inner circle and Martinstown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wlodimir Ledóchowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Page (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Politeja, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Citrivescence (talk) 23:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, I have to agree with the delete votes: the journal fails Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals). Not all academic journals are notable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Politeja should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politeja .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 00:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
		The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class is a herby awarded to you for your significant Poland-related contribution. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
		this WikiAward was given to Po Mieczu by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here on 10:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cleo Nordi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Miniapolis. I noticed that you recently removed content from Augustín de Betancourt without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Miniapolis 16:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Earl's Court, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polish Hearth Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wojnicz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarnow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kazimierz Dąbrowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Lublin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Franciszek Ksawery Branicki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chatelaine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of Kresy born Poles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Po Mieczu, Greetings. Pls note that List article do need independent reliable sources just like any other articles - pls see Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists. Once you have provided the inline citations than submit the draft for review. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CASSIOPEIA, thank you for pointing it out. I was hoping others would help in the task as I can ill afford the time on screen. Anyway, I have done it. Now I really must have lunch!. Regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Po Mieczu, Saw your inline citations and they are good. I also notice the discussion between you and another reviewer on Talk:Kresy. "List of people from Kresy" would be a better fitted name. You could resubmit it and I could review and change the name for you if you like. Just ping me. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CASSIOPEIA, thank you for your appraisal. Another editor has moved the piece into the mainspace. His view is that "List of people from Kresy" would not be correct in this context. However, there is a case for creating a category with that title. I do not know how to do that. The advantage of the category would be that, as long as it was confined to pre-1945, it could assemble members of all the diverse communities that inhabited the macro region. Kind regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 10:33, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs to be discussed at the Kresy article whether there should be a list of only those born in Kresy and now live in Poland. Also whether this article should be renamed to List of people from Kresy

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Kresy born Poles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Kresy born Poles, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts should not be forced on people, I think this is fine for the mainspace, much better sourced than most other lists I've seen. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Piotrus Greetings, When I move to draft it was no a source to be found and that was the reason for the moved - pls see [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Kresy-born_Poles&diff=prev&oldid=900374882&diffmode=source]. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:26, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CASSIOPEIA: No biggie, but I don't think the policies actually support userfication like that? It's one thing with new editors, but when someone is more experienced... of course, it is probably preferable to some deletion process. As long as it is all fine now, then it's all good, eh? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Piotrus, Would not want to send it to AfD, the article just needed sources as most editors do not aware stand alone lists need sources to support the content claimed just like any articles - see WP:STAND. It is all good Piotrus and thank you for the message above. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Po Mieczu! You created a thread called List of Kresy born Poles - declined at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kresy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inflanty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:17, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Patrick Beurard-Valdoye, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mościce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FTSE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grupa Azoty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grzybowo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Beurard-Valdoye, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Real tennis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moreton Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please make sure to indicate where it was translated from MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful to know which particular edit was allegedly a copyright infringement. Anyway, I have now discovered it was a translation I made from the original article on pl.wikipedia and have accordingly made an additional Interwikilink in the history of the article on Aniela Pawlikowska which already had a language link to the original article.--Po Mieczu (talk) 12:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aniela Pawlikowska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SOE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Józef Maksymilian Ossoliński (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Seneca and Leopolis

Lviv National Art Gallery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jan Stanisławski

Wrocław (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Epos

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Women in Maya society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complementarity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Po. I noticed you had a bunch of DAB-link notices here. There is a tool available which turns disambiguated links a different color when editing articles, so you catch them immediately. It works in the background once installed. If you are interested, I can steer you toward it. Let me know. Regards, GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feliksa Kozłowska, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Clare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Poles in the United Kingdom. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stara Wieś, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blessed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu

Thank you for creating Rosemary Gordon.

User:Blythwood, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've linked to a pre-existing page on her on the Spanish-language Wikipedia, and upgraded the Journal of Analytical Psychology obit by creating it from the DOI-this forms a weblink to the article. The article could do with inline citations at the end of every sentence–I've put in a name for the JAP reference to facilitate that. I've also moved the bibliography above the reflist, in case someone wants to add references into the bibliography section. As she appears to have been sometimes known as "Rosemary Gordon‐Montagnon" post-marriage, I've put that in the body text and as a redirect in case anyone's searching for it. Hope that all makes sense!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Blythwood (talk) 18:00, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Blythwood: Hello Blythwood, Blythwood (talk)

Thank you for the review and finding the Spanish connection I did not know existed. Thanks also for the doi and movements. I have done the in line refs and added ISBNs. Her extant colleagues and others will be pleased. I may be able to dig out an old snap of her. She was tiny. --Po Mieczu (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Please can you add citations to each of the people in the notable staff section you have added - as required by WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 20:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now done but please ensure you included citations in future edits. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dormskirk (talk), I really appreciate your kind service. You are right. Thank you and Season's greetings.--Po Mieczu (talk) 22:12, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Season's greetings to you too. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a tag to J. W. T. Redfearn regarding tone: it reads a bit too laudatory and familiar, when it should be dispassionate and neutral ("proud Yorkshireman" and "profound struggle" are subjective). It reads like an article written by friends and colleagues of Redfearn: I suggest paring back reliance on obituaries, and extracting just the facts, not the chummy tone. Close paraphrasing of Thomson 2012 should also be scrutinized and avoided. (talk) 19:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello --Animalparty!. I've made it less "chummy". Would you like to see if in your opinion it passes muster? Thanks.--Po Mieczu (talk) 19:15, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've made it even less so. It can still use work, but I've removed the tag. Note also that subjects should generally be referred to only by surname after first mention, per MOS:SURNAME. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tutoring!--Po Mieczu (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Analytical psychology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Mother (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That of course is an invalid argument, but 1) per WP:LEAD, this content may belong in body, not in the lead per possible issues with WP:UNDUE and 2) from [2] "prekursorki feminizmu" - precursor of feminism is probably not exactly the same as a " proto-feminist". I suggest you restore it with the better (direct) translation in the article's body, not lead. Also, the best place to discuss this is article's talk, where you can ping me. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:00, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of liberal theorists (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Adam Czartoryski

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barons Court tube station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to North End

Polish Social and Cultural Association (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Polish Communist Party

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bad news is that Józef Retinger does not meet WP:DYK criteria for being either created within last week or so, or being expanded 5-fold in that period (I count ~3x). Good news is that it is eligible for WP:GAN, which if successful, also allows an article to be DYKed :) So I recommend a WP:GAN. Mind you, reviews are backlogged due to lack of volunteers doing them, so you can wait between few days to half a year for someone willing to review your work... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please clarify how I could help? Would you like me to copy-edit the article? Or insert your translations from the French (where are they now?)?

Thanks. Nihil novi (talk) 02:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Józef Retinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Central European and Soviet occupation of Poland

Barons Court tube station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hammersmith tube station

Boy Capel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Anglo-French alliance

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job, I left some comments on article talk that will surely be raised by any GA reviewer so might as well get them addressed early. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:29, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Józef Retinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-bolshevism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Józef Retinger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boy Capel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Var (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Po, why isn’t Loyola College in Chennai, India listed in the list of prominent Jesuit organizations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) 03:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vikramjairam, thank you for your pertinent question. I think it's because after a surge of editing years ago, Jesuit themed pages have been somewhat abandoned. With more interest now, your point has a good chance of being included. Kind regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC). In fact, Vikramjairam, it is listed if you go into Society of Jesus and then [reply]

See also: List of Jesuit educational institutions § Tamil Nadu

There is also a photograph.--Po Mieczu (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Lulworth Castle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RC

Thomas Weld (of Lulworth) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Benefactor

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jasia Reichardt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ubu Roi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbara Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fahr Convent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torricelli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Double monastery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anomaly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archibald Knox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including St Andrew Bobola Church, Hammersmith, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus. Thank you for the assessment guidance. I try to do it when I start an article, but as I don't have a handle on the arborescence, it's a bit hit and miss. So for example I have just done a major re-edit on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_in_England_and_Wales#Polish_Catholic_immigration, but I would not know how to alert the WikiProject about a section in a broader article. Anyway, let me know what you think. My next few challenges are Józef Gawlina, whom I rather abandoned and Polish Catholic Mission both of which require expansion and improvement. Thank you as ever.--Po Mieczu (talk) 14:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Brompton Oratory

added a link pointing to High Mass

Catholic Church in England and Wales

added a link pointing to Blessed

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope it is clear that instead of creating "Edward Weld (of Lulworth)" you should have gone to the entry for "Edward Weld", which was redirecting to the middle of "Maria Fitzherbert", and replaced the redirect code with the your biography of Edward Weld. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 12:53, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well exactly, Bmclaughlin9, if you know how. It was also redirecting to the terrible Weld-Blundell Family page and to Thomas Weld (Cardinal) and it was doing my head in. Anyway, all's well that ends well as Anthony Appleyard kindly put it right.--Po Mieczu (talk) 19:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Weld family article before you edited it had several people named Weld with no clear connection to the Boston Welds. Rather than try to rationalize the article by putting them in chronological order, I think it makes much more sense to remove them entirely. If there is some demonstrable and reasonably close relationship, that can be mentioned without incorporating multiple paragraphs of text about them. --Macrakis (talk) 23:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Macrakis (talk), I tend to agree with you. Apart from the huge glitch dealt by site maintenance, the article was already higgledy piggledy, with a tinge of self-promotion from the English Weld side. The original Welds, as I put in the lead, are an English family going back to the Duke of Mercia (12th c.) and the American Welds are obviously descended from them, but we don't know precisely how, as one editor put it, unless a 16th c. genealogy comes to light. What we know is that the Boston Welds were probably Protestant and the English Welds, mainly Catholic. The Irish Welds came back from America and then on back to England, but they are still Protestants. Essentially, there are two sets of Welds. So maybe call the American Welds (American) and the English Welds (English). What do you think?--Po Mieczu (talk) 00:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just stumbled upon a useful book that can be used to add information on places notable Poles are buried in UK: [3]. I don't have the book, only online snippets, but perhaps you may live in a location where you could get a copy and expand related articles? (I live in Korea, no chance of finding it here). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Weld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilworth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:48, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cresta Run, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Fischer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Weld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watten.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Edward Weld (Senior) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 10:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DGG, I cannot find the speedy deletion tag to which you refer. Can you please guide me to it? In any event, I have added material to the article with citations. The subject of the article, albeit perhaps less notable than some of his ancestors and descendants, was involved in two unusual legal interventions in Georgian England and is a member of a highly notable family. While I understand your urge to keep Wikipedia free of dross, this action comes across as precipitate. For your information, I have created upwards of 100 articles and improved many more in several languages, but I generally take heed of helpful advice.--Po Mieczu (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the tag was removed by another editor--it's now at AfD. As usual, when people here disagree about an article, the right thing is to let the community decide. DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Weld (Senior) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Weld (Senior) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Recusancy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southgate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bernard Łubieński, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manresa House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits, Po, but I'm afraid I had to revert them. The section in the list that you added information to relates to Richmond town and Richmond Park, not to Ham or to Barnes. Best wishes Headhitter (talk) 21:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Analytical psychology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Complexity theory.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Analytical psychology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Synchronism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Analytical psychology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symbolism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Main, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barnes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Astronomer Copernicus, or Conversations with God, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aula.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Institut d'histoire du temps présent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greater Paris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antonina Niemiryczowa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Late Baroque.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yazlovets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu

Thank you for creating Jełowicki family.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:53, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ✠ SunDawn ✠

Thank you for your kind message. I have only just seen it due to the notification about the Arbitration Committee election, so forgive the delay in acknowledging you. It's so nice to have a positive comment, in contrast to the spleen sometimes encountered between editors. As a result, I am only an occasional contributor.

Best wishes, --Po Mieczu (talk) 15:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Synoman Barris was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

also the BLP has unsourced sections

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christine Paul-Podlasky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 18:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. Any chance you could add some references to this article? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Prokonsul, good to hear from you. I have put in three for starters. Kind regards. Po Mieczu (talk) 16:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please consider uploading the logo of the PES to the article to help illustrate it. Since the logo is copyright, the image must fall under WP:Fair use and be uploaded to English Wikipedia itself, not Wikimedia Commons. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip, MatthewVanitas. I'm not sure how to upload straight onto Wikipedia. It may be obvious, but I need a steer, please. Regards. Po Mieczu (talk) 09:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the left margin links on your article, there is an option toward the bottom which says "Upload file." If you click that you can then select "Upload a non-free file -- Uploads locally to Wikipedia; must comply with the non-free content criteria" and that will walk you through the process. MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Christine Paul-Podlasky, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Mieczu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Christine Paul-Podlasky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferdinand de Géramb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Procurator General.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest thst you discuss "ludicrous" claims on the talk page? Stonyhurst College now reads that is was started at the date you prefer by a person who died a 100 or so years before. That seems ludicrous too. Victuallers (talk) 12:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]