User talk:Photographerguy

The deletion of an article you created, Aether Game, has been proposed for the following reason:

Game with no claim of notability.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 18:46, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photographerguy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Srleffler (talk) 02:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Coconut run requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 01:08, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Keynote Remote, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Mainly due to lack of notability. This information does not need its own article as it would fit in nicely with the existing Keynote article. Secondly due to lack of references, orphaned, and other reasons given in the posted maintenance tags.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 07:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed you moved the article on Logan, the native American, and redirected Logan to a disambiguation page. I don't really care one way or the other, but you have left quite the trail of misleading and incorrect links. If you are going to make such changes, please check the what links here page and clean that up. Thanks. Rockpocket 01:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry about that. Photographerguy (talk) 02:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to discuss this first - I am moving this back until it is discussed on the Logan talk page, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I was a little too bold.... Photographerguy (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My main objection is that you copied content from another article without mentioning in the Summary field where you got it from. All the content that people contribute to Wikipedia is licensed under the GFDL, one of the conditions of the GFDL being that people's contributions are attributed. When you copy and paste content around without crediting where you copied it from, you make it difficult to track who originally contributed what.

Aside from that I'll post my comments on Talk:Mac OS X. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 22:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Raw image format. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 03:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted a number of your edits, most of which had no edit summaries and questionable intent and effect. Please ask on the relevant talk pages if you think some of your edits should be re-instated. In particualar, the idea that Exif include some raw file formats is wrong, even if some raw file formats can embed Exif metadata. But please use edit summaries to give a clue to what you're trying to fix. Dicklyon (talk) 03:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IPod Touch OS. Since you had some involvement with the IPod Touch OS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Creeperparty568 - It and all! 22:19, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Photographerguy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]