User talk:Pesco

Welcome!

Hello, Pesco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

-- Dave C. 02:03, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Pesco 16:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you removed what I had put in on the discussion page for the Coast Guard page. In Wikipedia, you are never supposed to remove information from a discussion page (even your own talk page!) that someone else wrote unless it violates copyright or is libelous. Discussion pages can be archived when they get too long but the content should not be changed --- Skapur

I didn't remove or change any comments. I combined similar sections into the same section for clarity and to show that the same issue has been an issue for a while, that it has been repeatedly been brought up. Otherwise you have one issue brought up in four different places on the discussion page. While we're talking, I just want to say good job on all the work you've done on the CG page. I'm still getting used to Wiki, but I've got the best intentions. Pesco 20:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see what I did wrong. thanks for fixing it. --- Skapur

IP address 152.121.17.5 has been blocked, and I think for decent reason. Could we have a soft-block instead (ie only blocks users not logged into an account)? Pesco 16:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons: Block converted to anon-only, per request. Account creation is still frozen, but accounts grandfathered or registered elsewhere shouldn't have any problem editing. Feel free to throw another template if you have any more problems. Sorry for the trouble! Request handled by: Luna Santin 19:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this might be of interest, and well, I'm procrastinating: these rewrites are like pulling teeth. Fortunately, the existing articles are so bad that it'd be almost impossible to make them worse. :) Anyway, here's a second mate article that's within a couple of days of being ready for prime time. Feel free to scale it as you see fit. Cheers Haus42 03:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pan pan. Pan pan. Pan pan. Attention all vessels. This is WikiProject Maritime Trades. Please be advised that the project has been created to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to shipping and the diverse maritime trades. Assistance is requested. This is Maritime Trades standing by on Channel 16.

Hey Pesco, though this might be of interest! Cheers. Haus42 13:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Virginia, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 22:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia, thank was most kind of you.Quick Reference 13:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome. Happy editing! --Pesco 02:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I need assistance should I come here?Quick Reference 12:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can, although I'm no expert, either. You can also go to the Help pages and find the right category. --Pesco 23:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind add some references of the Inter-service decorations of the United States military?

Thank you.--东北虎(Manchurian Tiger) 04:28, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MMA banner logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This has been addressed. I am greatly annoyed by this bot. --Pesco (talk) 03:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pesco.

I noticed you have recently removed a paragraph from Northwestern Michigan College's wikipedia page because it did not conform to Wikipedia's NPOV. I am a journalist with Northwestern Michigan College's student newspaper the White Pine Press. My name is John Parker. The paragraph you removed was rather inflammatory. Could I ask you some questions about how you came across it, why you edited the page, and how you are affliated with Northwestern Michigan College? That would be very helpful, thank you Pesco!

Parke139 (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sure. I came across the page because I have edited maritime-related pages in the past and I have them in my watch list. Northwest Michigan College is the home of Great Lakes Maritime Academy, so that's the connection that led to my previous edits. I saw the article name and previous editor's name on my watchlist. I saw that the account did not have a user or talk page. I often create talk pages for new users by putting a welcome message on a new user talk page. I also checked out the user's contributions, which led me to discover the nature of his edits. His other edit regarding the school's radio station was similar in nature and was reverted that day. I reverted the edit on Northwest Michigan College because, as you noted, it was an inflammatory edit that did not cite any references. I have no affiliation with Northwest Michigan College. The only motive for my edit was to preserve the reliability and integrity of Wikipedia. Thanks for your question, feel free to ask more if you have any. --Pesco (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pesco, I'd be interested in learning wiki better. That way I could upload verifyable docs to support the facts of NMC's failures to honor free speech and due process rights. Docs from the college, elected representatives of state and federal government,and federal governmental agencies. I am also an Eagle Scout. I was accepted as an alternate to the US Naval Academy by MI Senator Levin in 1972. The college's actions to deny due process and civil liberties disturbs me greatly. Many docs were shared with John Parker to encourage the college newspaper to cover these long-standing problems with the college.

I'm not sure that this message will get to you, its my first attempt to communicate through the website. I'd appreciate a response if you do get it. I can't promise that I'll check in again soon though.

Also, I no longer see my comment about the college radio station. Was this deleted, or moved to another page? Thank you.18:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)±Politicaldiscrimination (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up U.S. military pay grades! That article had been bugging me for quite some time, but I had no idea where to even begin cleaning it up. It makes a lot more sense now. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:36, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the clean-up of the 9/11 GI Bill page. I have several messages in with VA to fix some of their FAQs. Have found forum after forum incorrectly quoting incorrect info from elsewhere. Effectively nobody reads the law, which is not so hard as legal docs go. Anyway, just so you know not ANY Reserve Active duty that counts, it must have the specific sections in the orders as things stand now. Not to complain, but myself and many others are planning our lives around this funding. With so many thinking they are not entitled to it, its just a screw-up on the part of VA and Military.com for putting out bad or misleading info. Thanks again uaflyer (talk) 14:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and I think I'll use a "note" to clarify the specific sections that qualify. I just try to edit from the perspective of the uninformed reader: If I didn't know anything about the topic, or if I wasn't even in the military, would the article make sense? I appreciate your help trying to get the right information to reservists, and I'll work to make sure important details don't get edited away. ~Pesco^{So say•we all} 15:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The links seem to be working for me. I noticed a while back that they weren't working, but the Template generates all links as expected. It appears to be a periodic problem with the Thomas servers.DCmacnut<> 20:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Are the problems continuing?—Markles 00:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's working now, thanks. I think it was a THOMAS server problem like DCmacnut said. ~Pesco^{So say•we all} 00:29, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Worcester State College James M. Gavin Western wear Barbet (dog) Multi-speed Europe The Lords of Discipline Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences City clerk The Money Pit Philippine Coast Guard Grant Wilson Ukrainian Sea Guard Comic Strip Classics Diana Mocanu Californian (schooner) Intrawest Silverado Peter Hedges Samuel Meredith

Cleanup United States Maritime Commission Honus Wagner Military doctrine Merge Cylinder-head-sector Canada Border Services Agency Persistent world Add Sources American Water Spaniel Michael Hillegas Pariah dog Wikify Military of the Gambia Plymouth Brethren Military of the United Arab Emirates Expand Cognitive therapy Emilie de Ravin Structure and agency

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pesco, thank you for your recent edit (→Hurricane Katrina: Removed unlikely tagged sentence.) I was the one who originally tagged the sentence and meant to get back and remove it. It's very unlikely that Admiral Allen used Katrina in EVERY speech he has made since then. Again, thanks for watching my back, and next time I'll write myself a note. Semper Paratus! Cuprum17 (talk) 23:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, very unlikely. It was a sarcastic little comment, anyway. No problem! ~Pesco^{So say•we all} 22:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A pleasure, congrats ;p. My userpage vandalism is about 63 now ;p, all the best Spitfire^Tally-ho! 00:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All settlements are inherently notable, see WP:INHERENT and WP:OUTCOMES. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Your point has been raised, been debated, and been rejected numerous times at WP:AFD - the last I got involved in was this one which generates drama and there's no way it'll get deleted. A nomination will be likely be viewed as WP:POINTy. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your comment was uncivil. If you disagree with my interpretations, so be it. If you think that you'll be successful deleting settlements, at the risk of WP:BEANS go ahead and nominate them for deletion to prove your WP:POINT. The community has said again and again that inhabited places are notable and that articles on them should be created (even if they are stubs at first; nothing wrong with a stub) and to run into critics rather than useful assistance is not helpful. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • You call articles I have created as pointless and carp about politeness? Look in the mirror. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • What's the use of any article? These are useful for historians of the California Gold Rush, as many of these places arose, roared, boomed and busted during that time - lots of colorful history to be written on them, just not all by me. Some geneologists like to know where their ancestors were and perhaps still are. Some are interested in the settlement of California and how various gold rushes amid the big one prompted the sporatic settlement patterns still affecting the state. Some are political historians who may be interested to know the context in which the careers of at least 2 California Assemblymembers arose (yes, in these small towns) - just like we want to know what makes our politicians tick, some historians like to know where the politicians that steered California into the Union not the Confederacy came from. And then there's the locals who like to see their names in print - to add details, to do research into the history of their places. In short, these articles are as much use as their readers put them. Judging by the response to the various other geographic projects, there's a fair consensus that these are useful. In your new page patrolling, you'll find it more profitable to focus on unreferenced stuff than on these. For a geographical place, take Dzolo for instance. A you know what, we're not going to delete that either if someone can (and probably could) find a reference that it exists/existed. You may want to try further references yourself, or just move on to something else. Whatever. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see it now, the article was such a mess, with so many repetitions and other woes, I missed that and then with your edit, only saw the lack of a "Freddie Mac." Cheers, Gwen Gale (talk) 01:12, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your addition to the United States Coast Guard article of the Creed of the United States Coast Guardsman written by Admiral Hamlet. I linked his name in the article after you posted. I had put the Creed in his article several months ago. I don't know why I didn't think to add it to the CG article but I failed to do so. I have been wrestling with the term "Guardian" for several months now. I am, and will always be, a Coast Guardsman; I don't care what the Commandant wants to call it. The Guard has become so politicially correct these days that they don't want to offend anyone except us old retired "Guardsmen" that don't count anymore anyway. The Marines wouldn't change their name for members of their service because they value tradition; so why, after almost 95 years of being referred to as Coast Guardsmen does Admiral Allen decide that we are "Guardians" now? I have great respect for the Admiral, but I think he is making a mistake. I believe that changing the name that service members are referred to violates the first Core Value: Honor. Thousands of men and women have been proud to be called Coast Guardsmen for the last 90+ years, and to change the name diminishes the great history of service to country that the Coast Guardsman has provided. Thanks also for letting me vent...and Semper Paratus... Cuprum17 (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cuprum! No problem. After 5 yrs of service I sadly just encountered the Creed the other day... When I found it, though, I was hit by its powerful prose. "I shall sell life dearly to an enemy of my country, but give it freely to rescue those in peril." I love it. I've been trying to wrap my brain around "Guardian", also, and I'm still on the fence. Seems to tread too close to "National Guard" for my liking; I don't want to take anything away from them. I believe in Coast Guardsmen, formally, and Coasties, as the officially embraced nickname, instead of something to be shyed away from. Thanks for your many years of service, Chief! ~Pesco^{So say•we all} 23:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm posting this notice here since you're listed as a member of the Shipwrecks project. A merge proposal has been suggested on the project talk page here. Suggestions and ideas are welcome. Thanks. --Brad (talk) 23:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In an answer to your question in the USCGA article: these are Officer Candidates, not 1/c cadets. They have similar shoulder boards. There is no ceremony in which 1/c cadets would don full dress white w/ swords on Washington Parade field. Further evidence is that there are several personnel with a large set of medals in this picture, this would be highly unusual for a group of 1/c cadets. This could be relabeled, but I dont think that would fit in the page as it is about cadet issues in general and not officer candidate school. (O1eqlsfun (talk) 19:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pesco. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir Skate Longboard Shop, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muir Skate Longboard Shop (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 02:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Creed of the United States Coast Guardsman has been deleted by User:Bearcat. Initially, the deletion was about a "blatant copyright violation". I contacted him about it on his talk page and reminded him that the Creed was in the public domain (at least I think it is!) His reply to my talk page was more about copying verbatim from source. How do you have an article about a creed without quoting the creed? On 17 June my talk page was pinged by User:CorenSearchBot notifying me about copyright violations on the Creed because I had supposedly copied it in whole from Jack's Joint! I replied and thought the issue was taken care of. My question is will you help me in getting this reinstated and add some further research to the article so that it will stand by itself like other Creed articles? Examples include Rifleman's Creed, Airman's Creed, U.S. Soldier's Creed. You have far more experience than I on issues dealing with deletions. If I'm in the wrong on this I will let the deletion stand, but I as well as you and every other Coast Guardsman have lived the words of the Creed and I can't let the thing drop without a try. Will you give me some advice on how to proceed with this? Thanks. Cuprum17 (talk) 19:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chief. I'm not sure Pesco is around, so I might just jump in here. First off, there is some coverage of the creed here. Second: did the article have any content beyond the actual text of the creed itself? If so, we can get a copy in userspace to develop a bit before putting it back in article space. If not making a copy of United_States_Coast_Guard#Creed_of_the_United_States_Coast_Guardsman in your sandbox (for example User:Cuprum17/creed) might be a good start. The key to making an article about a piece of text like this is to have a few reliable sources that discuss the creed itself. The references used on the creed section of the USCG article are probably a good place to start, the The Coast Guardsman's Manual probably says some things about it, this is an official copy that can be cited, and this book might be useful. This discusses the creed a bit. Page 14 of this shows another use. Well, that should be enough for a start. Cheers. Haus^Talk 21:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tricare logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Native American Indian Dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Native American Indian Dog (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TKK ^{bark !} 23:05, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the article for GA status four days ago and left some comments, here. I'll leave it open another six days of so for your feedback. —Ed!^(talk) 13:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) (2nd nomination) (cf. [1]). EEng (talk) 04:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for additions to List of offshore wind farms in the United States. I've gone ahead and started article Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind. If you feel inclined to add to it, that would be great. Djflem (talk) 21:53, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]