User talk:Passenger88

Your claim of the full name being more common is unsubstantiated and the chosen title, including "(terrorist)", controversial, so I have moved the article back. In the future, please follow the process described in WP:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Favonian (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. Favonian (talk) 15:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing those sources. I was forced to add those citations because someone claimed the descriptions of 9/11 being a “terrorist act” were contentious. Hmm1994 (talk) 03:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Welcome. I would also like to request you to not add citations to the leads per MOS:LEADCITE (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Citations); move unneeded citations to the body. Thanks for your great contributions and continue editing! Passenger88 12:56, 24 July 2023

Again, not something I'd do normally, but I felt my hand was forced because someone else removed the claim that the attacks "seriously" harmed the U.S. economy per their interpretation of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. --Hmm1994 (talk) 01:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:06, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]