User talk:P2dwight

Hi P2dwight! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 19:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P2dwight! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, relationship sections of one article when there is a main article of the same name and topic, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

great work on History of Pernambuco Theroadislong (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello & Welcome, this, my friend is your own talk page. Cheers Celestina007 21:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You also have a User page. Many editors put content there describing their intentions and accomplishments as a Wikipedia editor. It is not intended to be a profile page. David notMD (talk) 02:23, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P2dwight! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Should I expect any feedback when editing an article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your excellent work at History of Pernambuco. DoomLexus (talk) 05:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P2dwight! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Stopped editing History of Pernambuco, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi P2dwight thank you for reaching out to me on my talk page! I may not be able to help content-wise, I don't have a proper knowledge concerning the History or the events that transpired in Pernambuco, but I try to work on copyediting and hopefully making the page more comprehensible for the general reader. I've taken a look at your recent changes and they seem to be generally constructive. The only comment I have is, between the lines, I somehow got lost or confused because of the many pauses and details.

For example, "...which occupied by Napoleon’s army, could no longer function as the metropole and, immediately no longer a colony Brazil’s ports were opened to foreign trade, government functions became America centered rather than trans-Atlantic, and countless functions and services formerly located in or focused on tiny Portugal necessarily needed to be performed in Brazil."

Maybe it's just me, on the other hand, maybe it would be better to improve it for the general reader. What do you say? Anyway just my opinion. Have a great day :) SyrOrange88 (talk) 03:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		For focused and diligent work that is certainly much better than what I did when I first started editing, please accept this small token of appreciation. Also, a reminder to not get bogged down in the minutiae of editing; there's a whole world of information out there in countless different subjects! Sincerely, Fritzmann (message me) 12:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fritzmann (message me) 12:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For the huge effort you have put into improving History of Pernambuco, especially providing comprehensive references. And going out of your way to engage other editors and keep it a collaborative process. Gronk Oz (talk) 02:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brites de Albuquerque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeronimo de Albuquerque, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 04:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]