User talk:Khips

==

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 2011 Alexandria bombing. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Lihaas (talk) 03:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

just restoring info that was also sources and reverted without explaination. If you hae speciric clarifications i can answer them onthe talk page.(Lihaas (talk) 03:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

do you know how 3rr works? you should read WP:3RR first.(Lihaas (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

On my understanding, when you redo things on the same page more than 3 times, this is what 3RR means. --Khips (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

youre biting yourself. you didnt give a warning which show you didnt attempt any conflcit resolution adn liable for a block yourself.

i also said youre welcoem to add back the citwes without removal(which was clear accmodation to resolve disputes).(Lihaas (talk) 04:15, 2 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

What do you mean by I'm biting myself ? --Khips (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

because you just showed to the admins that you went to them without attempting to resolve the dispute yourself. (ie- between us). this is just helpful advice. i dont think the 2 of us are at war at all. i told you to add it back which there is no opposition for and where i explained why i reverted.

i think well both agree the other new editor is at faulr on both for not attempting to resolve conflict by discussion.

to reiterate youre welcome to add back the cites content to the page(Lihaas (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Thank you. Please tell me about the edits that were removed and you would want to add back and I will add them back. --Khips (talk) 04:24, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]