User talk:Jappalang

Archives

Automated messages Barnstars and awards Do You Know (DYK) stuff Good stuff Featured stuff 0 1 Articles stuff Peer review stuff Media related stuff 0 1 Policy and guidelines stuff Social messages

I have lost all interest in contributing to the Wikimedia Foundation projects; I find that the time and effort required of me to deliver and ensure the existence of quality work here fail to come close to my valuation of other things in life (family and career). A hearty thanks to all who have striven to deliver quality products; I find your works a joy to read. I might rediscover the enthusiasm to participate in the distant future but not now... 12:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Another great loss. I wish you well, and if things turn around in here, it would always be a joy to see you back. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jappalang, the effort/research you invested in your work here and on the Commons was absolutely superlative. Yours is indeed a true loss. Эlcobbola _talk 18:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my ... both of you on one page to remind me of what Wikipedia has (not) become ... :( Happy New Year to you as well, Elc! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all you did here Jappalang - I wish you the best in whatever you do, and hope that some day you might feel like coming back here. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same from me. You're going to be missed. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hear, hear to all the above, specifically for your role as an images reviewer at FAC. Sadly, our best reviewers are increasingly likely to follow suit, faced as they are with increasing ingratitude and even abuse for their selfless efforts. My best wishes and grateful thanks. Brianboulton (talk) 15:52, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I add my good wishes. I shall miss your advice, and I hope you will be back. Tim riley (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have greatly enjoyed working with you, and I will miss you. Best of luck in whatever you do. With respect and admiration... Finetooth (talk) 21:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted contributions to the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured article reviews for the period October–December 2011, I am delighted to award you the Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Buggie111 (talk) 17:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Conan the Barbarian (1982 film) know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on March 16, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 16, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Conan the Barbarian is a 1982 fantasy film. It is based on the stories by Robert E. Howard, a pulp fiction writer of the 1930s, about the adventures of the eponymous character in a fictional pre-historic world of dark magic and savagery. The film adaptation was written and directed by John Milius, and produced by Raffaella De Laurentiis and Buzz Feitshans. The film stars Arnold Schwarzenegger (pictured) and James Earl Jones, and tells the story of a young barbarian (Schwarzenegger) who seeks vengeance for the death of his parents. Filming took place in Spain over five months, in the regions around Madrid and Almería. Conan grossed more than $68 million at box-offices around the world, though the revenue fell short of the level that would qualify the film as a blockbuster. Academics and critics interpreted the film as advancing the themes of fascism or individualism, with the fascist angle featured in most of the criticisms of the film. Critics also negatively reviewed Schwarzenegger's acting and the film's violent scenes. Despite the criticisms, Conan was popular with young male audiences, and the film brought Schwarzenegger worldwide recognition. The film spawned a sequel, Conan The Destroyer in 1984, and a remake in 2011. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were the image reviewer at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/A Rugrats Chanukah/archive1 which was promoted to FA on 25 January 2010. This included a review of the infobox image File:Rugrats Chanukah.jpg. I am in a debate at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 April 15#File:Pilot .28The Cosby Show.29 monopoly lesson.png, which is a debate over the infobox image for a television episode. The reviewer believes that the image currently violates WP:NFCC. I was hoping you might weigh in on this debate.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:28, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice this? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Jappalang. Hope to see you around again sometime. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 07:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	bold and cheerful increase of "the world's sum of knowledge"
	Thank you for leaving us quality articles such as today's timely Battle of Bosworth Field, and for your wonderful way to propose it for FA in lambic poetry, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (17 August 2009 and 30 September 2010), sadly missed! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 221st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 221st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:37, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Today, we read Battle of Barnet, with thanks to you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 221 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Six years, and missed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:19, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Meetup
Meetup 6
Status: Planning Date: 4 September 2012 Please indicate your interest on the meetup page.
v • d •  e

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Tuesday evening (4 September). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 6. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 00:44, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

Singapore Meetup
Meetup 7
Status: Confirmed Date: Wednesday, 31 October 2012 Time: 7:30 pm Place: Singapore Hackerspace Please indicate your interest on the meetup page.
v • d •  e

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on Wednesday the 31st of October. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 7. Hope you can make it. JVbot (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

Thanks for uploading File:NGB Meeting Alma.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ninja Gaiden DS Prep.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Since you give comments on music-related articles that are listed at WP:PR, I was wondering if you could give some helpful comments to Wikipedia:Peer review/Cher/archive1? Thanks, Lordelliott (talk) 05:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Jappalang has (sadly) not edited since January, so I don't think he will respond to your request. Regards, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 07:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Air France Flight 4590.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Sword of Shannara, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. As the apparent last GA peer reviewer, I am notifying you per policy. Cheers. N2e (talk) 20:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jappalang,
WP:VG's Newsletter department is looking for editors to interview for our Featured Editor column, and your name has come up in discussions during previous quarters as a likely candidate. From your edit history it is apparent that you are not currently as active an editor as you once were, and it's completely understandable if you don't have the time to be interviewed any more. But if possible, we'd love to hear your story from you.
The interview consists of some 15 questions that you can answer however you like and which you can tinker with up until the newsletter is published. Our hope is to have a small number of interviewees cued up for upcoming Featured Editor columns so your interview would most likely appear in a future issue. You can review previous interview questions here to get a sense of the kinds of questions you would be asked. If you see this note, plase let me know at my talk page if you would be willing to answer some questions for the Newsletter. Thanks! -Thibbs (talk) 14:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jappalang last edited on 5 January 2012. He shows no signs of the projected to which he contributed so effectively for five years. Brianboulton (talk) 23:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless, if he happens to drop in and notices this post he should feel free to contact me. This is an open-ended invitation and the Newsletter would love to hear from him even if it takes quite a while. If he is too busy that's OK too. -Thibbs (talk) 13:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Although you have not edited on wikipedia since January 5, 2012, I am notifying you since you were the image reviewer at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cloud Gate/archive4 and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/BP Pedestrian Bridge/archive3. File:Cloud Gate boy reflection.jpg and File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg are part of a mass deletion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cloud Gate (note that you have to scroll down past a couple of closed discussions at the top).--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sins of a Solar Empire - Diplomacy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Karas Nue CG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Karas Shinjuku Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Karas spirits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Internment at Scapa Flow.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:53, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know you're long gone, but I'm leaving this notification for consistency. Happy travels, wherever you are. - Dank (push to talk) 00:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:At a Sikh Wedding by Lat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hussein and the Pay Raise by Lat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Keluarga Si Mamat by Lat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Hello. I don't think we've met, but I want to thank you for your contributions during your time here. You have been a valuable contributor and I'm sorry you felt inclined to leave the project. Keep up the faith and if you change your mind, you can always come back anytime. Vaya con Dios! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:22, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conan the Barbarian by Renato Casaro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

we miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for Kampung Boy (TV series), introduced (in 2010): "A couple of months ago, the article on Lat the Malaysian cartoonist knighted (in his country) was brought here and became an FA. What made him internationally famous was his book The Kampung Boy. Now, I bring the adaptation of his book for judgment as a possible FA. Kampung Boy the animation is, in the words of a Malaysian animation critic, "the one that best portrays the country's image in terms of its culture and traditions" and a benchmark for the industry. This article is a comprehensive look at the animation from its conception to reception, drawing from academic sources and journalistic articles with its creator."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Game of Cootie has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wizardman 23:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FreeSpace 2 has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Toa Payoh ritual murders for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]