User talk:InternationalSupporter3

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:InternationalSupporter3/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! InternationalSupporter3, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kelle Roos, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kelle Roos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:39, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jay Spearing. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InternationalSupporter3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 20:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InternationalSupporter3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Kieran Moran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hull

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barrow Raiders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Dawson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cenk Tosun, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 21:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheffield Eagles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ike Ugbo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 16:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sheffield Eagles. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jayron32 16:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This block is to enforce Wikipedia's policy on verifiability of additions to Wikipedia articles. This talk page is evidence that you have been warned repeatedly over several months that you are making changes but not supporting those changes with reliable sources. You have, as far as I can tell, never acknowledged these warnings, or ever attempted to seek help or communicate with any user over their concerns. Given that, I have blocked your account for 1 week. If you can explain that you understand the problem, and agree to improve your editing and communication skills in specific ways to avoid these problems in the future, you may be unblocked early. --Jayron32 16:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

InternationalSupporter3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20514 was submitted on Feb 02, 2018 16:59:06. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remy Marginet is no longer a Sheffield Eagles player, his contract was not renewed at the end of the 2017 season. Therefore, my recent edit of his information page is justified. InternationalSupporter3 (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. It's been endlessly explained to you on this page that you need to cite reliable sources when making these claims. As soon as you were unblocked, you went straight back to doing what you were blocked for: repeatedly making changes to many articles, citing no sources whatsoever. Our own first-hand knowledge of something counts for nothing here: you must provide citations. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is Mark Aston a reliable enough source for you? InternationalSupporter3 (talk) 11:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If he's quoted in a WP:Reliable source, yes. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The Mighty Glen (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, or content that is not supported by provided sources..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In defence of this person, the sources do now back up the claimed stats. Hopefully this will allow the editor in question to continue to edit, or at least have a path back to being a valued contributer.Fleets (talk) 21:03, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

InternationalSupporter3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There was a website outage, which was rectified afterwards. The stats were shown to be correct at that point. Is there a path for this individual to return as a permanent block seems a little excessive, perhaps a tutorial from an admin, not the permanent loss of a contributer.Fleets (talk) 22:09, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't accept proxy unblock appeals. If InternationalSupporter3 wants to appeal this block, they need to do so themselves. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:59, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would start with reading the Guide to appealing blocks. SQL^{Query me!} 23:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InternationalSupporter3. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]