User talk:IamIRAQI

Hello, AsadGhali2200, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Karmell (company), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TonyBallioni (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Saif Nabeel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Amani Alaa, IamIRAQI!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A good start on the new article, but it could really use a bit of expansion based on the sources that we have.

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

— InsertCleverPhraseHere 15:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Barbie Medical Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 18:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al Ain Foundation for Social Welfare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Ain Foundation for Social Welfare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafeef Al Yasiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafeef Al Yasiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:08, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Firas Alsarray is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firas Alsarray until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syrian Professional Players is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syrian Professional Players until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oras Sattar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oras Sattar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:37, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nour Al Zain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nour Al Zain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:09, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Alaa Al Ansari requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 216.235.231.28 (talk) 13:48, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.1% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for September: Hispanic and Latina women Women in the Olympics Women from New Zealand Coming up in October: Women and disability Healthcare Geofocus: Nordic countries Continuing from month to month: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 12:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Tazerdadog (talk) 19:12, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Jawad (Journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Jawad (Journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HINDWIKI • CHAT 03:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahad Alshemari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahad Alshemari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Ammarpad (talk) 06:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fareed Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

references are in Urdu language. Add more reliable sources and translate it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HINDWIKI • CHAT 01:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HINDWIKI Thank you -I've edited the article completely--IamIRAQI (talk) 16:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! IamIRAQI, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! HINDWIKI • CHAT 01:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the creation of Erbil Polytechnic University! Keep working towards making Wikipedia a better place! Operator873CONNECT 04:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mr.Operator873--IamIRAQI (talk) 04:16, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Page nominated for speedy deletionMwinog2777 (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OKAY - Thank you User:Sir Sputnik.--IamIRAQI (talk) 17:43, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaafar Al Ghazal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaafar Al Ghazal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- HindWiki^Connect 12:56, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Abishe. IamIRAQI, thanks for creating Federation of Journalists of Iraq!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello IamIRAQI: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 09:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 09:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Khalid Jassem, IamIRAQI!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

==Happy New Year!==

IamIRAQI,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Abishe (talk) 02:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 02:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abishe Thank you--IamIRAQI (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Miss Iraq in America, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 07:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cmr08 OKAY - Thank you--IamIRAQI (talk) 20:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry if i vandalise your iraqi singers articles, i don't mean to vandalise it, but you must know that some artists don't work (With MBC, Music Box, etc.) Best Regards and good luck to your next article DRKLY2760 (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Aldelfi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Aldelfi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- HindWiki^Connect 10:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahdi Al Aboudi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahdi Al Aboudi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- HindWiki^Connect 10:37, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IamIRAQI,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nazar AlQatari for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IamIRAQI,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jafar al-Kashmi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IamIRAQI,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rafat Albdr for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IamIRAQI,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Khaled Alhnen for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IamIRAQI,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ali Alsalim for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Luxor hot air balloon crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Luxor hot air balloon crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen that you've created multiple new pages recently. However, these often include a large number of references (10 or more) presented in a row, with no indication of what the references are supposed to represent. This isn't helpful to readers or to people reviewing newly-created pages. Please try to make sure that references support claims made in the article or are to reliable sources that support notability. Having references to things like Youtube videos or the iTunes store only looks like WP:REFBOMB and will possibly cause your pages to be deleted. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Power~enwiki: Okay.Thank you to notify me--IamIRAQI (talk) 22:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohamed Al Helfi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamed Al Helfi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Civil Society for Reform you wrote that the party was founded in August 2018 which is obviously incorrect. Should it be 2017? You give sources but they're in Arabic which is of no help to me! Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 18:42, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pichpich: Oh Thanks Man for notify me--IamIRAQI (talk) 18:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IamIRAQI,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Zaid Al Habib for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Enwebb (talk) 04:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Ali Faisal Alfayadh, IamIRAQI!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please clean up the sources. For more information please see WP:CITE

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IamIRAQI. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mouin AlKazmi, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murtada Almoussawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murtada Almoussawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:39, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaafar Al Ghazal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaafar Al Ghazal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:53, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hanan Saeed Mohsen al-Fatlawi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 90 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IamIRAQI. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Maritta Hallani. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 02:47, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronz: Thank you to notify me--IamIRAQI (talk) 10:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IamIRAQI. After looking a bit more at Maritta Hallani and some of the other articles you've created, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 03:20, 8 April 2018 (UTC) Thank you very much[reply]

@Ronz: I will try to develop myself - thank you for passing on other guidelines and tips--IamIRAQI (talk) 10:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As far as External links go, WP:ELNO#10 says to avoid social media links. When no official website exists, one social media link may be appropriate. --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Jawad (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Jawad (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SmartSE (talk) 20:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IamIRAQI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was surprised by an administrator @Smartse: who was prevented from editing the English Wikipedia definitively !!!! Although I am in English Wikipedia since 2016 I have more than 1000 edits and more than 150 articles. I hope to intervene and to express an opinion and equitable relief @TonyBallioni: @Arthistorian1977:@RingtailedFox:@Abishe:@Anarchyte:@Narutolovehinata5:@Operator873:@Hebrides:@Onel5969:@Onel5969:@Derek R Bullamore:@GrahamHardy:@Rich Farmbrough:@Cmr08:@Ronz:@GoodDay:@Rathfelder:@Meatsgains:@Natg 19:@Vincelord:@MarnetteD:@Tom.Reding: IamIRAQI (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ALso, please do not ping people like that. It's inappropriate. Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 19:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IamIRAQI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have read the guide and I did not promote anyone but at the same time I Created an article for an Iraqi famous singer (Ahmed Jawad) in Arabic (احمد جواد) and I think through this article I was blocked. I have not added sources in English. This is just the problem IamIRAQI (talk) 20:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block is valid, and has nothing to do with the language of the sources; in fact, the article remained longer than it otherwise might have because the sources were in Arabic. It has to do with the fact that you are creating articles about non-notable musicians, which indicates you are not familiar with or are ignoring the notability guidelines for musicians. I think you also may have a conflict of interest and/or a paid editing status that you haven't declared yet. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I firmly endorse Smartse’s block. I have been of the belief this editor was using the English Wikipedia to create spam articles that would be rejected on ar.wiki for quite some time, and was reviewing their creations to eventually make an ANI case. Smartse can speak to his own reasoning here, but having reviewed more of the articles after this block, I am confident this is a paid editor based on the link spam and churnalism, which I don’t want to go into too much detail on for BEANS reasons. In my mind, this is good both as a WP:NOTSPAM block locally and to enforce the global TOU under WP:UPE, namely, even if they declared that alone wouldn’t justify an unblock. I will not review this since I was building a case to block myself, but I did want to note this for the reviewing admin. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • All also note that from my review of the articles here, the exact opposite of what they claim to be the case is true: these articles survived as long as they do because they have no English sourcing and Arabic is notoriously difficult to machine translate into English, so no one was able to evaluate them. In some cases I had to consult with native Arabic speakers on the subject to confirm my analysis of the sourcing. The game here is taking advantage of our desire to avoid systemic bias. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TonyBallioni This is not logical.I strongly reject this action because I did not do anything wrong I swear--IamIRAQI (talk) 20:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

IamIRAQI (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi all, To this moment, I am surprised by your decision to prevent me from editing in Wikipedia, but I hope you will reconsider the block. Why was permanently prevented? Prevention should be for days or weeks or at least one alert!!!???!!IamIRAQI (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you have not attempted to address the reasons for your block, despite making three appeals, your ability to make further unblock appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 19:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Anybody to revoke the TPA, please?~ Winged Blades^Godric 16:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Winged Blades of Godric: The decision of administrators of the English encyclopedia is very incorrect and I wish them not to take such decisions unless they are voted by members.Please kindly remove the block from my account.--IamIRAQI (talk) 18:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)--IamIRAQI (talk) 18:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , i need an article on Wikipedia, could you please contact me on Ossama2005a@yahoo.co.uk Muhsen2020 (talk) 19:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghassan Alshami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghassan Alshami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BD2412 T 02:53, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raed Abu Fatean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raed Abu Fatean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Alaa :)..! 08:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Iraq in America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Iraq in America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

فيصل (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shimaa Qasim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

According to WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mohammed Qays (talk) 04:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]