User talk:Itsramhere

Hi Itsramhere! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like RhinosF1 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hasn't entered production yet, doesn't meet WP:NFF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarileru Neekavvaru and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sarileru Neekavvaru, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sarileru Neekavvaru, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itsramhere. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarileru Neekavvaru".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahesh Babu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baahubali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you added row numbers to the table for Nandamuri Balakrishna filmography. There is a template called Template:Row numbers which would be very handy as the manual numbering may sometimes be mixed up due to human errors. It's better to use the template, also making it easy for maintenance! -- DaxServer (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, would you mind stopping the addition of numbering? I have asked if we have a consensus for it. You can follow and leave your comments here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Numbering for the films table under Filmography -- DaxServer (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Chiranjeevi filmography, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I have reverted the edits you made. You have been asked to achieve a consensus at WP:ICTF for adding numbering to the tables. You have not participated in the discussion and has continued editing. Please stop editing in this regard and achieve consensus before you edit any further. -- DaxServer (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reverted the edits at Venkatesh filmography (revert), Nagarjuna filmography (revert) and Nandamuri Balakrishna filmography (revert). Please achieve consensus -- DaxServer (talk) 16:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting back to your edits. Please first participate in the discussion. Read more why Wikipedia requires a discussion: Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. -- DaxServer (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In the article Sri Venkateswara Creations, I have reverted the section in the lead that you have added (edit and revert). Wikipedia needs reliable sources for the content. I request you to find the sources and then add content. The responsibility of providing the sources lies on the editor who adds the content. You can read more about the policies here: Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources -- DaxServer (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DaxServer. Your recent edit(s) to the page Naresh (actor) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- DaxServer (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DaxServer, here is how I came to the conclusion that Naresh (actor) was born in 1964, and not 1960.

1. He mentioned in this chit-chat with Krishna and Ali recently that he was 7 when he acted in Pandanti Kapuram.^[1] 2. In his interview with RK on ABN, he mentioned that he made his debut as a hero at the age of 17 in 1982, and he got married at the age of 19. ^[2] 3. During the launch of Vijay Krishna Green Studios at Nanakramguda, producer Adiseshagiri Rao mentioned that both Jayasudha and Naresh (actor) made their debut with this film about 50 years ago.^[3] 4. In her interview with Yamuna Kishore for iDream, Jayasudha mentioned that she was around 12 or 13 during the making of Pandanti Kapuram, her debut. ^[4] 5. Finally, in the movie, Pandanti Kapuram, which was released in 1972, you can clearly see [[Naresh (actor) was about half the size as Jayasudha.^[5]

Do you still think that I am wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsramhere (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the links. I have actually watched the first two. I was looking at if he mentions his DOB anywhere, but he didn't. I haven't really made the calculations like you did. Although two things I heard is that he mentioned his debut at 17 and marriage at 19. I haven't added them back to the article yet. Would you mind posting at the Wikipedia:Help desk and ask how to consider the primary sources like this one? (And possibly ping me as well so I could also participate. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 19:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Itsramhere and DaxServer, I have restored the year as before per this source which calls hims 59 in 2019, ie, 1960.

If we are using WP:BLPSELFPUB for birthyear, we might very well cite his twitter bio (verified) that says 20 January 1963. Personally, I wouldn't have any objection, if its accompanied by atleast one other reliable source. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ab207 If you could find some sources, please do so! I haven't done any research on Naresh yet. -- DaxServer (talk) 17:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Itsramhere! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ravi Teja filmography that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Please do not unnecessary split the tables; see WP:FILMOGRAPHY for guidelines Ab207 (talk) 16:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Venkateswara Creations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Love Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]