User talk:It's Been Emotional

Hi all! Drop me a line here, and I'll wake up soon and get around to answering you. Also, I'll reply here, unless there's a good reason not to.

---

Hello It's Been Emotional, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ecoleetage (talk) 16:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Hey, it is my pleasure to welcome you to Wikipedia. If you have any questions about the site, feel free to drop me a line. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you so much for the extract at the reference desk about price/quantity as the x/y axes!! I was about going mad. I'm really glad I took the time to come back and look at the responses. Thanks again for typing all that out. forever indebted. 82.120.227.157 (talk) 05:26, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, glad to have at last been of help in answering a question, rather than just asking them all the time :) It's been emotional (talk) 16:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(I was going to add this to the discussion at the Language Reference Desk, but it has been archived.)

You can learn Sanskrit online here: Learn Sanskrit from Sanskrit Tutors on eduFire.

Here are six online Sanskrit dictionaries.

Sanskrit, Tamil and Pahlavi Dictionaries, The Sanskrit Heritage Site, Sanskrit Dictionary Page,
Sanskrit Dictionary for Spoken Sanskrit, Online Sanskrit Dictionary, and Apte Sanskrit Dictionary Search.

This website is entirely in Sanskrit: कर्माधिकारः. -- Wavelength (talk) 05:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians by language has a link to Category:User sa. -- Wavelength (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for this. I can't check this out just now, as it's about 5am here, but thankfully it's now in a convenient place, so I'll be sure to visit these sites soon. Regards, It's been emotional (talk) 20:23, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have decided to make it personal by suggesting that I haven't understood the sources given in the article. Let me allay your fears by saying that I have indeed understood those sources. I would be happy to cooperate with you in bringing additional sources to both articles. The issue here seems to be that you are of the opinion that most authors take as part of the definition that the Gateaux derivative/differential must be linear. I will grant that many do, but the cited sources by Max Zorn, Einar Hille, and Ralph Phillips do not, and neither does the Springer EOM entry. I have adjusted the Gateaux derivative article to indicate the different usages in mathematics. The EOM entry made a rather bizarre distinction between the differential (possibly nonlinear) and the derivative (linear) which was adopted by our own encyclopedia article. I don't know if this is just an unfortunate byproduct of a poor translation from the Russian, but I find the distinction less than helpful, and have excised it. I have also completely restructure the Gateaux derivative article to improve the presentation of content. Sławomir Biały (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I request that anyone reading this post have a look at | this talk page and see what is presumed to constitute a personal attack in this particular case. I apologise for any ill-feeling on this matter, as I did not wish to start anything personal. It's been emotional (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or perhaps it was here. I'm really hoping I can avoid such troubles in the future, since it interferes with what I really want to be doing here, which is editing and improving the articles :) It's been emotional (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And of course reading them! It's been emotional (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel 3.1

mlk? dwr?

Daniel 3.2

mlk? l?xšdrpny? sgny? wpxwt? ?drgzry? gdbry? dtbry? tpty? mdynt? lmt? clm? mlk?

Daniel 3.3

?xšdrpny? sgny? wpxwt? ?drgzry? gdbry? dtbry? tpty? mdynt? clm? mlk? clm?

Daniel 3.4

wkrwz? qr? ¿mmy? ?my? wlšny?

Daniel 3.5

b¿dn? qrn? mšrwqyt? sbk? zmr? dhb? mlk? -- AnonMoos (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for this. It must have taken you an awfully long time typing that, with all the fancy characters :):). Much appreciated. It has also given me a lot of practice at reading, because I can compare with your transliteration. My error was reading the Hebrew/ Aramaic full stop as a letter, so I missed two words that ended in "aleph - fullstop."

However, try as I might, I still can't work out the missing two aleph-final words in Daniel 1:1-5. I can only find one in each of verses 1 to 3. Could you possibly tell me in which verses the missing two are? I'm wondering if maybe you are counting aleph-final words in the middle of hyphenated words, but even that wouldn't change my count - I can't even find any aleph-final components of hyphenated words. Thanks, It's been emotional (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check out Institute of Actuaries of Australia--SPhilbrickT 23:49, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll look into this, It's been emotional (talk) 19:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck --SPhilbrickT 19:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re [1]. I share your sentiments exactly. I loved the series and admired the great writing and acting up until series four, then it unraveled but there still was the occasional great episode during seasons 5 and 6 (although I've now completely given up on the show and haven't even watched season 7 at all).

I've looked over the episode list, trying to remember which episodes I could recommend, but it's too long ago for me to tell from the plot summaries.

At any rate, since we apparently share the exact same opinion about the series, I thought I'd recommend other comedy series I've greatly enjoyed instead.

Things like Black Books, Louie, Arrested Development or Episodes and of course 30 Rock ([2]) come to mind. If you haven't watched one or more of these, I'd give them a shot rather than holding on to the unfortunately and ungracefully deteriorating HIMYM. I also hear fantastic things about It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia although I never managed to quite get into it for some reason. Another series I liked, but I know it's not for everyone, is Californication -- not a comedy, but enough comedy to offset the drama for more than a few good laughs, if you like the humor (s04e04 "Monkey Business" comes to mind as a great episode that showcases the best of the series). --195.14.197.88 (talk) 19:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google returned this IGN article about HIMYM season 5, recommending certain episodes. --195.14.197.88 (talk) 19:14, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for those tips. Glad to know someone agrees and that there isn't much point hanging on to something that's pretty much gone anyway. It was the same with Friends, after about season 6 at the latest, and it was teetering a little before that. It's been emotional (talk) 23:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I'll keep this notice: I didn't know such a template existed, IBE (talk) 14:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I answered your question back there, again.:D--Irrational number (talk) 17:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Answered you again!--Irrational number (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support with the scapegoat thing, IBE. -- Jack of Oz ^{[your turn]} 20:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, there, thanks for acknowledging it. The ref desks are more fun with more chilling out, and will always attract people if the culture is right. IBE (talk) 06:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You expressed interest on WP:VPR in an essay to help out newbies. I've started a rough draft of this essay. Could you please take a look? Feel free to make changes.--v/r - TP 00:25, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I actually directly asked for my first barnstar, believe it or not. Prodego ^talk 06:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - this is one of the nicest things I've experienced on Wikipedia IBE (talk) 06:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar and that awesome conversation on the reference desk. Sorry it took me so long to respond. Also, I'm sorry if you tried to email me, I hadn't confirmed my email yet (I thought I did); if not, disregard. Thank you once again :-) Phoenixia1177 (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't get mine to show up either, email me at WikiPhoenix1177@hotmail.com. I completely understand about time, I would be happy with even just one more hour each day...:-)Phoenixia1177 (talk) 11:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't see the post, as I was away for a couple days. I'll take a look later tonight. Warm regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 13:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go ahead and incrementally improve the page. I have a lot of pages on my watchlist, so I may miss your edits, so if there is any specific edit you would like me to check, let me know. Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 04:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! We've all been slowly adding to WP:The End and now it's becoming quite long. It occured to me the other day that we might be able to split it into a guide instead of a single page with the same down-to-earth language and helpfulness. I've started a prototype, please check it out and let me know if it's worth doing.--v/r - TP 16:04, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look over time - I've made this one of my priorities on Wikipedia, but I don't get a lot of time. From a brief glance, love the format and the look, but not totally sure about the need to split it up so much. But still we could try both. I'm really all for keeping it short, because we run the risk of creating longer policies, and adding to them when what we really need to do is streamline. Still, I'll keep popping my head in to try and refine it, because I do agree it's needed - all of the current introductions/ tutorials seem to be quite long, and no one emphasises the need to learn as you go, and take policies like occasional vitamin supplements. Cheers, IBE (talk) 03:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If we break it up, we can emphasize on each page that the user can stop and finish the guide later. I also wonder if we could set up some kind of "Bookmark this page" button so they can come back to it later.--v/r - TP 13:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My point is that we can have the broken up version, as well as the unbroken version. With the broken up version, basically I think some things should be left out, such as "Have patience" - by all means say this, but I don't think it should get a separate page. As far as people knowing they can stop and finish later, my belief is they will tend to want something complete. At least, if you wish to adopt this approach, although I would advise trying to limit the number of pages, I would also suggest having an index, either at the end or the beginning, with a one sentence summary of each point on the index page. That way, at least they have an overview. The problem for them is to decide just where they will give up and return later. I once did a ridiculously long internet survey, answering over 100 questions, just because I'd started, so I wanted to get to the end. I didn't want to waste the time I'd already spent, and I figured if I didn't complete the survey, it was definitely wasted. Then I got to the end, and found I didn't have JavaScript turned on, so it was all lost anyway - and the form didn't preserve my clicks when I went back. I never tried it again. Our problem is to try and keep those sorts of people who want to get to the end of the overview. Once they've started, many people won't stop, just to see what's going on. Then afterwards, they'll say, well, never again. I'm keen on the idea, and above all the visual format - this will hold people for a while longer because it looks good. I would suggest if it is to be broken up, keep the number of frames to about 6-8, include a photo on every page, and above all, include a marker at the bottom: "page 3 of 6" etc. I also like the text "You can continue on to the next page of this guide or you can stop here, it's up to you," but (as you have done so far) I would only put this once (though I'm assuming you already agree?). Basically I agree mostly with this format, especially with the idea of teaching them how to understand the user interface. That is a potentially brilliant idea, but don't tell them everything - just get them started. Presumably you agree here also, though. I wouldn't know how to do the graphics side of things here, but I would suggest bright red circles around the key bits, especially the things at the top of the page, such as the tab for the talk page/user page. Then, if someone can do it, just a bit of simple text clearly associated with the circled component, explaining it, in a format that clearly stands out on the page - but I don't know if there's a graphics whizz out there. Perhaps we could try recruiting someone within Wikipedia? Let me know if you think this is too elaborate. IBE (talk) 14:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I mostly understand what you mean. So if I understand right, you want the essay and guide to be sort of "companions" with basically the same message but tailored a little differently. Whereas the essay would be a little smaller, less detailed, and easier to get through; the guide would be more comprehensive with a little more graphics and instruction? Give the user full knowledge beforehand what exactly the guide consists of. Is that the general idea?--v/r - TP 15:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely :). As far as giving the user full knowledge beforehand, it could be done at the end, so long as the guide clearly states "page 4 of 7" etc. But at the beginning would be good (arguably best) and the position of it could be decided later anyway. IBE (talk) 16:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		Merci beaucoup for your help translating the sources on Muhammad Ilyas Qadri. J'espère que chapeaux élever votre gaufres intelligent! Yunshui 雲‍水 23:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that's a way cool barnstar :) IBE (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!

Miss Bono ^[zootalk] 19:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for helping my article!!!. Rezashirazz (talk) 17:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just came across this exchange. Nice try, though I can't say I'm surprised how it came out. But Bugs certainly did answer your question, didn't he? :-\ —Steve Summit (talk) 16:40, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he was certainly in form that day ;)

Hi there. With reference to your recent post on WT:RD, I recently had occasion to report Medies to ANI ( here). Nothing came of it, but if you're building up a dossier... Tevildo (talk) 21:24, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou - I am "building up" a dossier, although I would prefer to say that, as things come to hand, I file them away. I don't go searching for evidence, and for a long time I had only a mild problem with Medeis. It just got out of hand, and now needs to be monitored. That said, I don't think Medeis was trolling in that particular instance. I think that edit is a case of: too many troublesome edits have put her fellow Wikipedians a little offside, although maybe she'll quibble with me that I don't understand the offside rule, or something like that ;) IBE (talk) 05:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... the problem is that Medies has the potential to be a very useful contributor, if she would just stop behaving in such an obnoxious fashion. It's not just a question of getting rid of someone annoyning and useless, which would be much easier. Let's hope that we get a positive result next time (or, indeed, that she decides to change her behaviour without official steps being necessary, although I wouldn't put money on that). Tevildo (talk) 09:58, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In respect of your query four years ago, the reason why you couldn't find them is almost certainly because she was a fake. --Viennese Waltz 18:13, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that's some good detective work by those people concerned. But a very clever deception, if such it was. She might have been more than one person, although with one only doing the final draft of any post, for literary consistency. IBE (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]