User talk:Gregorik

Please take a quick look at the archived talk pages at Budapest, this may help to avoid unnecessary disputes, deletions etc. 'Little Paris' or 'Paris of the East' are common nicknames for Bucharest and if you look at the page history, you will realize others tend to confuse the two cities[1]. Nicknames are already mentioned in the infobox anyway.

Your contributions are welcome, the article really needs some attention and you cited sources. Lack of these is one of the main problems here. Squash Racket 09:19, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the info. I hope a consensus will be reached on the intro at Budapest. Gregorik 09:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gregorik! You've worked a lot, and the article starts to look good. I also think districts should have their own article, they are basically cities on their own right. Budapest will still be a very long article if you cover just the most important things. Squash Racket 04:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to work on part of the article calmly, you can create a subpage. For example User:Gregorik/Highlighted Districts. When you're ready, you just copypaste it into the article and delete the subpage. Squash Racket 11:09, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Gregorik! A Budapestről szóló article-be beraktam egy képet a Duna Towersröl. Amit te rögtön átmozgattál egy másik helyre a lapon. Megtudnád mondani hogy miért nem volt jó helyen? Bocsi, ha letámadásnak tűnik a kérdésem egyébként nem az, csak érdekel mért tetted arrébb. katonams^{ide írj} 2007. november 18., 21:56 (CEST)

Write on the talk page, not on editor's user page, it may be considered vandalism. I copied your message on his talk page. Be careful with that next time. Squash Racket (talk) 17:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to my deletion of the section expansion tags? I took those out because each section already contained a link to another article where the history was described at much greater length; it seemed to me that the main article provided an appropriate summary. If that's not what you're referring to, perhaps you have me mixed up with another article. In any case, you should assume good faith--I am, in face, trying to improve Wikipedia, just as you are. Nareek (talk) 12:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

Visszavontad a képcserémet a Hungary szócikkben [2]. Miért? Ami most ott van az szerintem minden, de nem dobostorta (sápadt és bedöntött karamellborítás, alatta mogyorószemek(!), szintén mogyoró az oldalán stb.) Az én képemen sem egy tökéletes dobostorta van, de legalább hasonlít az igazira. Üdv, Hu:Totya (talk!) 09:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess there are too many red links in there. Some of the unimportant ones may be removed, but some backup articles should be written. Squash Racket (talk) 16:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

come on, how can you say the intro is ok? the trird paragraph is nothing more than unrefferenced bragging. it has 10 examples of some -est that are completely irrelevant to the overall image of the country. it's like saying japan has the longest bridge in the world; while this is really impressive, and possible implies something about the technologic level of the country, there are other more 'addequate' isssues that could be put in the intro of the Japan article. I am trying to be helpful, but I do not have too much patience with such biased viewsNergaal (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of December 13, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

   1. Well written?: NO WAY. List of the administrative divisions and of the public hollydays should not be on the main page of a country. Introduction is way too long. History might not be too long, but it is obviously overrepresented in the article (i.e. this article is not entitled History of Hungary).
   2. Factually accurate?: It is GROSSLY underreferenced. There a lot of places where there is one reference for an entire subsection. I guess means it fails to be factually acurate
   3. Broad in coverage?: There is nothing about education. Economy section barely gives some information (come on, it is a member of EU, it must have something relevant)
   4. Neutral point of view?:
   5. Article stability?
   6. Images?: the article almost abuses the use of images. The images should be relevant more than a little to the subsection.

Please check other articles on countries that are allready a GA.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Nergaal (talk) 22:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)"

Read point 6 (the article almost abuses images) meaning it's flooded with non relevant useless images like a (not very good) drawing of the battle of muhi, or turkish soldiers in ottoman hungary that you lifted from the ottoman hungary page. Didn't you see how much better the article looked without those pictures? Hobartimus (talk) 11:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gregorik thank you very much, youve done a GREAT work in every article relating to hungary, ive really noticed you are always looking how to improve the articles and how to make them look better. Youre doing an excelent work. Now id like to ask you something. Since you are so involved in the hungarian things, wouldnt you like to do the visa free lists on the hungarian passport page?? maybe you have some source of the visa free lists, it would be so great if you could, so please answer me if your interested or if you have some source where to get the visa free stuff. Thank you--Philip200291 (talk) 16:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey i got the source to do it....but I dont know how to do it, so ill leave you the sourve here, and maybe you can do it:http://mfa.gov.hu/kum/en/bal/consular_services/Entry_of_Foreiners_to_Hungary/visa_exemption/, thank you--Philip200291 (talk) 02:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You remove Business Week/Mercer's Quality of Life ref and replace it with prleap.com? For GA/FA status every single ref will be questioned and believe me most references for this article should be dropped. It is misleading to present any city of two million as the most livable, but Budapest reached an acceptable ranking. Squash Racket (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to move it from the lead if you find it reflects negatively, but an encyclopedia is not for advertisement. This ranking is based on 39 quality-of-life criteria, it is posted every year, it is a reliable source often cited. If you read some FACs, you'll see reliable sources are a key factor. Squash Racket (talk) 18:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noted that you had upgraded the rating on an article which you had edited. Not that I have never done it, but I think we can agree it does put you at a bit of a conflict of interest. I'm going to take a look at the Budapest article as it's a shame that a top priority article like this would not be at FA-status. You deserve recognition for the amount of work you have invested in the article. Thanks for your contribution! Alan.ca (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• FYI: I have responded to you on my talk page. Alan.ca (talk) 03:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the changens in the talk page first. --Olahus (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#A7 Board who is noble (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

Főleg külföldi cégeknek dolgozom, itthon tényleg kevés a lehetőség. Vannak neten ezek a fordítói adatbázisok, azokba érdemes regisztrálni, és időnként van melólehetőség, többnyire ideiglenes, de begyűjtöttem már hosszabb távra szólókat is. Ha rákeresel, hogy translator database, találsz ilyet milliót. Sok sikert! :) – Alensha ^talk 21:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(huh, erre meg elfelejtettem válaszolni, bocsi :) Nem tudom megítélni, mennyire lehet megélni belőle, mert nem egyedül élek, de szerintem ha összeszedsz pár állandó megbízót, akkor igen. Csak ez ugye olyan, hogy még ha állandó megbízóid vannak is, akkor is néha egy hónapig nem küldenek semmit, néha meg elhalmoznak melóval és legyen kész azonnal :) engem erre a hétre most alaposan elláttak tennivalóval, de utána ki tudja, mi lesz. De ez már csak így van ebben a szakmában... – Alensha ^talk 15:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

nem forgatókönyveket, regényeket és DVD-re filmeket, meg majd fogok videójátékokat is, ha minden igaz. – Alensha ^talk 21:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most of the stuff here. I am sorry, Alacoshos and others. Gregorik (talk) 20:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I recently noticed your edits to American exceptionalism -- and would like to discuss further:

• I'm not certain what was meant by "The term shifted in meaning to the (far) right during the 20th century, making it hard to reconcile with Tocqueville's original theory." You might want to define what American exceptionalism currently means if it has shifted in meaning from "qualitative differences" to something else entirely. I believe that there are three different uses of the term:
  • At least when I've encountered the term "American exceptionalism", I've seen it used in the "traditional" (de Tocqueville) sense - that the United States differs qualitatively from other nations - that the United States has played a unique role in world history - and that the United States has, at least on a historical level, diverged from the rest of the world in certain areas. This is what I have understood American exceptionalism to mean.
  • There is somewhat of an implicit undertone of nationalism within American exceptionalism - US citizens view the US with pride because they view its history as differing from the rest of the world - that they view the US as an exceptional nation. Is this what you're referring to?
  • Others refer to "American exceptionalism" when they state that certain Americans - specifically the George W. Bush Administration, certain elements of the US Republican Party, as well as various neoconservatives, such as John Yoo or John Bolton - view the United States as being an "exception" to international law, and, for example, incite torture of prisoners, or fail to sign treaties. This is how the term has been used as of late in popular media, especially following a conference at Stanford in 2003. For example, Roger Cohen, a columnist at the New York Times, as well as Nicholas Kristof, at the same paper, have used the term in such a manner.
    • If you're referring to this phenomenon - of neoconservatives believing the US to be an exception or somehow superior to international law - I would wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment that this view of the US is properly described as a "reactionary myth". If this is the case - you might want to qualify your statement by clearly identifying which form of exceptionalism you're calling a reactionary myth - especially seeing as this is a new use of a very old term that goes against what some might view as the history of its use.
• I believe that perhaps it may be better to use a different tone in writing about this subject. Words like "Many identify it as a reactionary myth"...is perhaps a bit strong to be saying in an encyclopedia, except in quoting a critic. It might be better to say something like "So and So states that 'American exceptionalism is a reactionary myth'", or that "Critics, such as So and So, allege that American exceptionalism is a 'reactionary myth'" (with a reference to which critic called it a "reactionary myth").
• I'm also assuming good faith - that there were no implications in your comment that "Article needs huge revision by objective reviewers (that means non-conservatives w/o vested interest)" that somehow I'm a "conservative" or a "right winger". I consider myself to be a "left winger", and a subscriber to the political philosophy of modern American liberalism, which is left-of-center. I believe that my edits were objective, based on what I understand about American exceptionalism - at least the traditional use of the term.
  • I would also say that my tone in some of the comments that I made might seem inappropriate or offensive, when I stated that "This is an encyclopedia, not a discussion board." I was just surprised at the number of edits that were made, and what I viewed as the tone of those edits - and shouldn't have taken it personally. I don't own the article, your view is as valid as mine. If you took offense, then I apologize.
• Thanks for listening.Katana0182 (talk) 02:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that I'm going to take a break from that article for a few months. Upon reflection, it's clear that I haven't been as objective as I should have been in some of my writing - there are other areas of the project that I'll work on for the time being. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.Katana0182 (talk) 03:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm notifying you as a courtesy that I have requested editor assistance to review the article American exceptionalism, the verifiability of the sources you have cited, and the following diff. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_exceptionalism&diff=267363076&oldid=267362550) 72.70.226.132 (talk) 02:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm notifying you as a courtesy that I am renewing my request for editor assistance - that I am not going away, and I believe the article is in major need of revision due, in part, to your editing practices. You stated that you are not willing to discuss the matter with an IP user, but I'm sure that others are willing to discuss your conduct with me. If necessary, I intend to pursue the dispute resolution process.71.127.15.202 (talk) 08:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add poorly sourced material to Mark Steyn, per WP:BLP. If you persist in doing so you will be blocked. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gregorik. I checked your sources, and found that some, possibly all of them are writers' personal blogs, which are not acceptable on Wikipedia. However, if some of them were not, or you can find mainstream sources, please bring them to our attention at Talk:Mark_Steyn. Viewfinder (talk) 07:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. That article needs way more balancing though. Excuse me, Mark Steyn and Jayjg. Gregorik (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pink Sziget 2007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 23:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded to your message at Talk:American exceptionalism. Cordovao (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Puszta, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.  —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 11:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The video does not mention anything like the part of the article it allegedly supports does, the ref was deleted. If you find antoher better one, feel free to add it.  wlad 17:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hope my reformating did not interrupt what you were trying to edit on the article's page. I will seize editting on it to allow other editers to contribute. Sorry for any inconvience it may have caused. Thanks ♠ B.s.n. ♥R.N.contribs 07:49, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've written (rather a long) comment on the MTV Generation article in response to Peregrine981's request for comments on the discussion page. You don't have to read it, but it struck me that there is also little agreement on what constitutes a pair of shorts (e.g compared to trousers, kneebreeches, knickerbockers etc) , but little controversy in having a decent page about them. If you have time, could you please add any further comments you might have on the MTV Gen issue to the page? I found your previous comment quite helpful. Centrepull (talk) 22:00, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gregorik, thanks for making that report to AIV. I noticed that you warned the IP using the standard vand warning templates, while this is appreciated I'd like to remind you to sign your posts using the four tildes ~~~~ when leaving said warnings and to warn IP's on their relevant talk pages only as opposed to the warnings that you left on User:82.95.205.208. If you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page. Reagrds, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 21:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gregorik, I was out of Wiki for quite a long time; hope to be able to help you. Best regards, Montessquieu (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me out and show me where this was discussed on the talk page? I only see one person asking a question. Was this discussed elsewhere? I am gathering a list of sources that indicate that she was in fact a former model. Thanks! ∴ Therefore cogito·sum 22:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Beast in not a reliable source whereas the Associated Press is. I'm going to move this to the talk page, if you don't mind. Please come and discuss it there Talk:Elin Nordegren#Model so we can get this resolved. Thanks! ∴ Therefore cogito·sum 00:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's done i guess. My apologies, Therefore. Gregorik (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have joined into Christian theology work group. I hope that I will help to make better articles in area of Christian theology. If you have some suggestion or propose be free to write. Best wishes,--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 16:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Miloš Forman appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Erik (talk) 16:20, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to American exceptionalism, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:12, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn to format bare URLs appropriately for American exceptionalism. Your bare URLs added to the article do not give proper timing information (was it said last week or last decade?) and they make extra work for others. See WP:CITEHOW for pointers, especially Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners with citation templates.

Also, a reference can be used twice if it is named: see WP:NAMEDREFS. You do not have to repeat it in full.

I noticed that you found two URLs to back up Nicolai Ouroussoff saying America was "an empire enthralled with its own power and unaware that it is fading." Your two URLs were very poor ones, with one having half the quote and the other a blog. It was fairly easy for me to find the right URL with the full quote in its original source. Please do not resort to multiple weak references when one good one suffices. Quantity is not the answer. Every time you put up two or three references in a row I will trim them back to just one, if appropriate, especially for simple things like direct quotes. Binksternet (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not refer to me in such a way, I take strong offense to such labeling, I did not add any of the content you are removing. Any further such references to me and I will report you. Off2riorob (talk) 16:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is MTV Generation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MTV Generation (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Pareto principle. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gregorik. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 17:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kant Pan, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://theoscarsite.com/whoswho7/pan_k.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's the deal with this edit of yours? You marked as minor a reversion of poor quality sources and citation needed tags replaced by Rjensen with a better source, and trimmed way down. You are faced with two editors who agree that the Rjensen edit is suitable, me and Rjensen, but you have reverted twice without taking the issue up on the talk page. Please do not mark such edits as minor. It would be best to raise the issue on the talk page, seeing as how you are outnumbered at the moment. Only successful argument of your views will win me and Rjensen, not edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 16:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recorded here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive645#Twinkle_abuse_by_Gregorik ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 08:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not sure what you've done in your signature, but you should be aware that in Google Chrome it shows up as basically a bunch of boxes, rather than your username. In Firefox it's fine. Cheers, Rd232 ^talk 15:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've added "mirroring the nationality and preference of its voters and making the list less than comprehensive." to the The 500 Greatest Songs of All Time article. What is the source of this opinion?--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 17:41, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Common sense. Now please don't contribute to WP's famous systemic bias by reverting it. And I'm sure there are sources for this fact. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 19:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The preferences of the voters, and how comprehensive the list is (or is not) are opinions, and must be attributed. If you have a source for these opinions, they can be included in the article. See WP:Neutral point of view for more detail.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you're among the more frequent updaters of File:Smoking bans.png, so a couple of things: 1. Spain's legislation has changed, it would be nice if someone updated this. 2. Several people have asked what brown means, since it's not on the legend. Would it be possible to clarify this? Many thanks. Lampman (talk) 15:44, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gregorik! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the project and please let me know if you have any comments, questions or suggestions. --Kumioko (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 03:29, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also:

1. Portal:United States
2. the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard
3. the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
4. and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.

You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 20:46, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Awww. Certainly you've been round long enough to recognize a BJAODN. No biggie. I was just hopin it would be around long enough for somebody to get a from it. I agree it wasn't helpful to the conversation, but it was funny. Probably best that it was reverted. Oh well. 64.40.60.60 (talk) 12:41, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you look at my userpage, you can tell that I do have a sense of humor; but the Libyan Civil War article is a biggie, and is kind of immune to jokes. Agree? ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 15:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. 64.40.61.120 (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The April 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you got a mention in this report, please don't replace any content without discussion and consensus at the BLP noticeboard here, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
.--Kumioko (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

United States National Archives WikiProject

Would you like to help improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the National Archives and its incredible collection? This summer, the National Archives—which houses some of America's most important historical documents—is hosting me as its Wikipedian in Residence, and I have created WP:NARA to launch these efforts. There are all sorts of tasks available for any type of editor, whether you're a writer, organizer, gnome, coder, or image guru. The National Archives is making its resources available to Wikipedia, so help us forge this important relationship! Please sign up and introduce yourself. Dominic·t 15:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you misclick somewhere with this edit? Your edit summary was "messed-up lede back to stable", but you actually reverted the entire article to your last edit of it in October 2010, changing a great deal more than just the lede. I've reverted the edit. --McGeddon (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gregorik- you've reverted the opening paragraphs again. what do you mean by "stable"? It's obviously not stable. Bhny (talk) 17:21, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The July 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 00:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 15:40, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi gregorik. would you please add the colour brown to the legend of this pic? --Ysangkok (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

There is a little "user war" over the Hungary wiki article.

Some users are trying to force that stuff, I guess from Romania.

Can you help them?

Thank you! --Csendesmark (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's perfect :)

I was asking for this before but than we didn't got protection. Thank you for your time :) --Csendesmark (talk) 12:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I assume that you like the subdivision of Europe: http://141.74.33.52/stagn/JordanEuropaRegional/tabid/71/Default.aspx as comparedd with many old ones, relating to the idea of European semi-orientalism. The thing with that Statistical division is that it is nott based on proper research but this: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49.htm. Would you like to help me in collecting sources, and users, supporting clearer division of Europe, which actually gains popularity very fast? BBC uses it, for instance: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/country_profiles/default.stm In short: would you like to ally--Rejedef (talk) 08:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Arthur C. Clarke. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AV3000 (talk) 23:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to Talk:Dohány Street Synagogue because it may interest other editors

Hi. When you recently edited MTV Generation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Informal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To stop the edit warring (you are really in danger of getting blocked!), I have moved the disputed paragraph to its own section on the talk page:

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chiropractic#Scoliosis....moved_from_article_for_discussion

Per WP:BRD it should not be restored until a consensus about its fate has been reached. Thanks for your cooperation in this matter. Collaborative editing works best here. -- Brangifer (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Budapest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to The Door, The Journey, As You Desire Me and The Good Fairy

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Since your are listed in the participants of the WikiProject Hungary, it looks like you might be interested in articles related to Hungary and the Hungarians. Currently, the WikiProject Hungary is quite down with only a very limited active users, but I'd like to add some new impulse to it. So, I would like to invite you to take a look at this proposal, share your opinion and join a task force if you think you might be interested in it. If there are five or more applicants for a task force, it can be set up and by a cooperation of dedicated users we can further develop the task force related articles – at least give a boost to this small part of the project –, the task force itself and by so probably the whole WikiProject Hungary as well. If you have questions, ideas or thoughts you can add them on the talkpage of the proposal, here (I watchlsit your talkpage) or you can contact me directly on my talk page. Your words are very welcomed!

Thank you! Regards,

Thehoboclown (talk) 15:16, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gregorik, could you explain why you reverted changes to the introduction of the Sziget Festival article? You've reintroduced grammatical errors, slightly odd number formatting, and (in my opinion) muddied the attendance figures. It's the second time you've done that, and it's hard to address your concerns if you don't provide any. shellac (talk) 09:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Miskolc International Film Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hello71 (talk) 03:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MPlayer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:01, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedian,

I am Marina. I am writing to you in order to clarify my fears. One of the users have been reverting my edits on Western Europe, as well as other European-related issues. I noticed, that his or her page is full of talk page entries related just to that. Would you mind to stay in touch with me? I read about vandalism on Wikipedia and I fear this is one of these cases... I hope, of course that I am wrong but... the evidence seems to suggest otherwise. By evidence I mean Arcilla's talk page as well as entry, and the fact that rather than move a critical comment from user page to a talk page, it was simply reverted. --Martina Moreau (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fantasy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Horror and Magical creatures (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I notice that you aren't currently subscribed to Ichthus, the WikiProject Christianity newsletter. Witha new format, we would be delighted to offer you a trial three-month, money-back guarantee, subscription to our newsletter. If you are interested then please add your name tothis list, and you will receive your first issue shortly. From June 2013 we are starting a new "in focus" section that tells our readers about an interesting and important groups of articles. The first set is about Jesus, of course. We have also started a new book review section and our own "did you know" section. In the near future I hope to start a section where a new user briefly discusses their interests.--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 21:02, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Gregorik! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Gregorik! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alternative rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transgressive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miskolc International Film Festival, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mephisto and Hanussen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mobygames killed by Gamefly.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 18:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the lead there is the passage:

«Some psychologists argue that the definition of SPD is flawed due to cultural bias: "One reason schizoid people are pathologized is because they are comparatively rare. People in majorities tend to assume that their own psychology is normative and to equate difference with inferiority". Therefore "[t]he so-called schizoid personality disorder is one of the more blatant examples of the APA’s pathologizing of normal human differences."[3][4][5]»

In the "History" section there is another passage saying:

«Psychologist Nancy McWilliams argues that the definition of SPD is flawed due to cultural bias: "One reason schizoid people are pathologized is because they are comparatively rare. People in majorities tend to assume that their own psychology is normative and to equate difference with inferiority."[12] Commentators have responded McWilliams is asking for an impossibility (norms as void as itself normative) and the more philosophically minded psychologists have pointed out, humans functioning well in the absence of norms realistically cannot exist and her argument represents a form of fallacious nihilism. In other words, the counter-argument is human beings have something like a teleological essence, and at least some underpinning of culturally transmitted ethics harmonious with the human telos (in Aristotelian terms), being a necessity inescapable for human beings striving after living well or Maslovian "flourishing", rejecting the predicted social anomie of the unspoken relativistic or nihilistic philosophical assumptions arguably underlying the views of McWilliams.[citation needed]»

I think that does not make much sense to have the same passage two times (and the second passage has the advantage if identifying the author of the quote).--MiguelMadeira (talk) 02:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:586px-CECTA countries.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit to Church of St Lawrence, Rode. Do you have a reference we could use with the neopagan claim?— Rod ^talk 12:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Exorcist (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 99.53.112.186. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Romantic hero because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 99.53.112.186 (talk) 00:07, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Garment District, Manhattan, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. BMK (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• In addition, please review WP:BRD. When your Bold edit has been Reverted by another editor, the next step, if you continue to think the edit is necessary, is to Discuss it on the article talk page, not to re-revert it, which is the first step to edit warring. During the discussion, the article remains in the status quo ante. Thanks, BMK (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andras Gregorik in Uni.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miskolc International Film Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jameson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 08:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Buda Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neoclassical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about my attitude; I didn't intend that "you" to mean you in particular, just the generic "you", but in retrospect it was the wrong place and time to use that.

In the long term, I have had the idea that that article could be improved to GA and eventually FA status, with the idea that it could run on the main page on December 23, 2023—the 50th anniversary of the film's release. Is that something you might want to be part of? Daniel Case (talk) 00:59, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katalin Kariko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Budapest Opera interior.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Gregorik! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! interstatefive  00:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Gregorik! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]