User talk:General Wesc

Welcome to Wikipedia! There is a wikipedia listserv where more discussion takes place, if you'd be interested in that. --KQ

G'day, General! In addition to the mailing list, there are two places within Wikipedia you might be interested in. If you have a specific question that you think others might be asking, simply add it to the bottom of the Wikipedia FAQ, and someone will answer it. There's also Wikipedia chat, for less structured general conversation. Welcome, and have fun! --Stephen Gilbert

Remember: Wikipedia is not Everything 2. Also, when linking to a whole web site, it's best to link to a Wikipedia page about the web site that in turn links externally to the site itself. This helps to put the web site into a more neutral context. --yerricde

Welcome! If you want to revert an article, click on "History" at the top of the page, select the version you want to revert to, edit it, and save. -- Zoe

Great, thanks. (Of course, I've already relinked that entire darn thing, but in the future I'll know better) -- LKBM

I have a question regarding your change of <i>...</i> to ''...'' in my article on the First Age. I know that the italics and bold tags have been deprecated, but they're endorsed by How to edit a page. I wanted to achieve specifically italics, because they're the convention for foreign-language phrases, rather than emphasis.
You know what? I'm taking this to the talk:How to edit a page.

I really don't know what's best; I just blindly convert HTML to Wiktax, ignoring sementic diffences. There's been discussion of outlawing HTML on Wikipedia completely, but if we do that, I'd hope for a separate Wikicode for italics and emphasis. Taking it to How to edit a page is probably a good idea. I've been here over a year, but I'm still a newbie. -- General Wesc 18:20 30 May 2003 (UTC)

A sparkling gem? Golly! Likewise, I'm sure! :) Uyanga 13:15, 10 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Hi. I undid your Henry Jackson redirect because it's Wiki policy to use the most common version of a person's name. Unless Henry M. Jackson was almost always called Henry Martin Jackson, it's not accepted to put the article at the latter version. RickK 21:43, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

I did absolutely nothing with the article. All I did was avoid the double redirect of Henry Jackson->Henry M. Jackson->Henry Milton Jackson. But thanks, it is better this way. General Wesc 21:52, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Your list of Middle-earth articles is good. -Itai 15:32, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Hi there General! I noticed that you have made a lot of terrific contributions to articles about philosophy, especially philosophical skepticism. I'm trying to organize those of us who are philosophically inclined over on WikiProject Philosophy, in the hopes of sprucing up the philosophy pages around here, and I'd like to invite you to join us. If you're interested, drop on in -- there's no obligation, I'm just trying to form a nexus and central meeting point for philosophically-minded 'pedians. Thanks, and good luck! — Adam Conover † 20:56, Apr 8, 2004 (UTC)

Good evening. You recently weighed in with an opinion on the discussion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/User:Tim Starling/Password matches. On the basis of that discussion, I have proposed some changes to our privacy policy at Meta:Draft privacy policy. I would appreciate your thoughts if you have time. Rossami 22:19, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Greetings from the real Middle-earth! You've not done much on that subject for a few months but your article list (which features on a "Shire (Middle-earth)" redirect page in "what links here") is impressive and I see you contributed lots in previous years. It's likely some of your work may be getting added to the LOTR Wikicity. Appropriately acknowledged, of course. You may like to help with the process! Robin Patterson 04:52, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’m Seahen and you’re not. Neener neener!

On Talk:Castle of the Winds, you say you have the game’s source code. Can you read it? If so, can you tell us about the specifics of battle calculations and what goes into them?

Much sadly, my hard disk went kaput! and the source code was gone, just like that. Dreadfully sorry. -- General Wesc 02:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revolution within the form is up for deletion. Can I ask for a vote to "Transwiki". Thanks.WHEELER 23:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I have just come across your list of Middle-earth articles at User:General Wesc/List of Middle-earth articles. I hope you don't mind that I have taken the liberty of adding it to Category:WikiProject Middle-earth, and to the list (similar, but of a slightly different sort) that I have been building over at User:Carcharoth/Tolkien_categories. I have also been tidying up the Tolkien category system (top level: Category:Tolkien), and wondering what to do with List_of_Middle-earth_articles and List_of_Middle-earth_articles_by_category. Hopefully all this will be updated/merged at some point, and a more up-to-date list will emerge. I was also wondering if you know of any other such lists of articles? It was only by chance that I stumbled across your list! Carcharoth 20:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I first created my list, we didn't have the category or anything. I stpped worrying about it when I discovered that the more-complete List of Middle-earth articles appeared. I know of none beyond what you've listed. I actually didn't know about many of those. -- General Wesc 21:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thanks. I do like some of the headings you used, so I might borrow those for some new categories! I particularly liked the lists of redirects and disambiguation pages - is there an easy way to find the redirects, apart from clicking "What links here"? Carcharoth 07:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try searching for site:en.wikipedia.org Middle-earth OR Tolkein "redirected from" on Google. I'm not sure how much use it will be for the harder-to-find redirects, though. -- General Wesc 15:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm at a disadvantage as my broadband is down due to huge storm and won't be back until Saturday at earliest. I tried looking in fish forums etc. but dialup is too slow. PalmCraft 20:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:

• Using an age group category, such as Category:Wikipedians in their 30s
• Using a decade category, such as Category:Wikipedians born in the 1970s.

If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 13:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Those both strike me as pretty bad options seeing as I was born in 1982 and I'm in my twenties. ;-) Thanks, though, I'll update momentarily.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dominion War, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Dominion War. Judgesurreal777 19:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominion War, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Dominion War satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominion War and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Dominion War during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 21:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found your old user page while checking out some old edits. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 12:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I've also updated an some old links in your welcome messages. Graham87 12:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	A Targ for you!
	For creating the Worf article - first Targ to be awarded by me Kate (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, General Wesc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, General Wesc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, General Wesc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, General Wesc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear General Wesc,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:47, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barahir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barahir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jughead (search engine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]