User talk:GeneralNotability/Archives/2021/April

This is an archive of past discussions about User:GeneralNotability. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

lol sike jp×g 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Primefac, was not in accordance with the interests of the Cabal, and as soon as we figure out how to do so, it will be reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, or harsh realities and dark truths of Wikipedia bias you'd like to expose, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Majavah (talk!) 06:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

^{[April Fools!]}

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

admin aboose. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 15:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Okay. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:21, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

• When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
• Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

• A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

---

--ԺՐՊլՅՏ (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

• Fancy, huh? Drmies (talk) 02:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

  I see Drmies is currently beating TonyBallioni on Arturo's "best people" list. You're gonna need to work on those poll numbers, Tony! GeneralNotability (talk) 02:10, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

  Drmies deleted me once, so it's fair he's ranked above me. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:06, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

  And I'll do it again. I don't know if you know this, but I sent him an Easter basket. Drmies (talk) 13:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

  Remember, Arturo, these two have both run checkuser on you, I haven't. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

19:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

	The Downlink	The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
		1 March 2021 — 31 March 2021

Volume 2 — Issue 6
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News! On March 7 the Wide Field Camera 3 on Hubble Space Telescope entered safe mode after a software error was detected. And took days until the camera was fully active again. read more The Space Launch System completed a full-duration (8 minutes and 20 seconds) static fire of the core stage on March 18, after an earler test in January failed to complete the test. Featured Content The Apollo 12 article was promoted to a Featured Article on March 27, 2021. After being nominated by Wehwalt who is a significant contributor to the article.
Article of the month. Hubble Space Telescope The Hubble Space Telescope was launched into low Earth orbit in 1990 and remains in operation. It was not the first space telescope, but it is one of the largest and most versatile, renowned both as a vital research tool and as a public relations boon for astronomy. The Hubble telescope is named after astronomer Edwin Hubble and is one of NASA's Great Observatories.	Image of the month. Astronaut Roger B. Chaffee is shown at console in the Mission Control Center, Houston, Texas during the Gemini-Titan 3 flight.
Members New Members: Bop34 (Joined on the 2nd March) Ninney (Rejoined on the 16th March) Askeuhd (Joined on the 22nd March) Ben MacTavish (Joined on the 27th March) Number of active members: 104. Total number of members: 316. March Launches All times stated here are in UTC. Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L17 (4th at 08:24:54) Success Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L20 (11th at 08:13:29) Success Long March 7A – 7A-Y2 (11th at 17:51:28) Success Long March 4C – 4C-Y42 (13th at 02:19) Success Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L21 (14th at 10:01:26) Success Soyuz-2.1a – CAS500 1 (22nd at 06:07:12) Success Electron – "They Go Up So Fast" (22nd at 22:30) Success Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L22 (24th at 08:28:24) Success Soyuz-2.1a – OneWeb 5 (25nd at 02:47:33) Success Long March 4C – 4C-Y36 (30th at 22:45) Success April Launches Launch dates can change. See a current list: here. Falcon 9 – Starlink V1.0-L23 Soyuz-2.1a – Soyuz MS-18 GSLV Mk II – GISAT 1 Vega – Pléiades Neo 1 Falcon 9 – Crew-2 Soyuz – OneWeb 6 Delta IV Heavy – NROL-82 Long March 5B – Tianhe 1	Article Statistics This data reflects values from the 31 March 2021. Spaceflight articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 18 4 7 36 FL 4 4 8 FM 97 97 GA 11 22 36 53 122 B 1 48 37 45 131 C 55 160 529 491 9 1,244 Start 38 158 1,118 2,223 374 3,911 Stub 6 245 2,185 227 2,663 List 14 130 79 211 434 Category 1,033 1,033 Disambig 48 48 File 199 199 Portal 55 55 Project 57 57 Redirect 1 1,123 1,124 Template 493 493 Other 37 37 Assessed 126 542 2,052 5,220 3,148 610 11,698 Unassessed 52 52 Total 126 542 2,052 5,220 3,148 662 11,750 Monthly Changes Since February, 28 new pages have been added to Spaceflight and Apollo 12 has been promoted to featured article! 1 more article has reached GA-class, with 1 more file, 6 more C-class, 14 more start-class and 8 new stub class articles.
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list. Newsletter contributors: Ninney & Terasail

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I was recently doing a review of all the page restrictions I've placed or taken ownership of over the years, and I noticed that a majority of the pages were no longer battlegrounds and didn't require restrictions anymore. I was looking backwards a couple of months on the article history and talk page looking for major diputes, and for the most part things were pretty quiet. I've removed the BRD restrictions from about 70% of the articles that I had put them on, and the 1RR restrictions from probably 90% of pages.

I figured while I was at it I might as well try to track down the other pages with active sanctions and see if the admins who placed them might also be interested in doing a similar review. The following list might not be complete, but it's the best I could come up with by tracking usages of the American Politics AE template. (Perhaps you can compare it to whatever system you have for tracking your active sanctions.) For convenience I'll put links to the edit notice page and the talk page.

• Template:Editnotices/Page/Kimberly Klacik - Talk:Kimberly Klacik

I'm hoping that removing some of these restrictions can help restore some sense of normalcy to the topic area. In any case I hope this list is helpful. ~Awilley (talk) 00:03, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Awilley, thanks for the note. I think that the situation regarding Kimberly Klacik has died down, so I've lifted the restrictions. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:50, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, that user reverted your edits trying to possibly promote that non-RS app/social media link [3]. I've reverted them and issued a level-2 warning for WP:PROMO here. I replaced that source yesterday with RS sources and expanded that part. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Fylindfotberserk, thanks for the heads-up (and thank you for taking the time to add RS!). I'll deal with it tonight. ^{SubjectiveNotability} _{a GN franchise} (talk to the boss) 13:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Fylindfotberserk, I see they've backed off for the moment, so I won't be doing anything...but I'll be asking COIBot to keep an eye on that particular domain, just in case. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

That would be a very good idea. Yes, they seem to have backed off, even apologized [4][5] for their behavior. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi GN - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Baingan Curry - all socks are blocked and tagged, but it looks like it needs merging into another case. Want to walk me through it (or do it yourself and then tell me what you did)? Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 14:50, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Girth Summit! So here's what you need to do:

• First, does the entire case need to be merged, or is there just one section that was filed under the wrong master? If the latter, copy the section with attribution (i.e. edit summary to the effect of "Copying incorrectly filed case from (link to source page), see that page's history for attribution). In this case, it's the entire case, move on to step 2.
• Make sure the pages don't have any overlapping history (last edit on target page must have been before the first edit of the current page). If they do have overlapping history, you copy with attribution instead - merging pages when they have overlapping revisions leads to a messy history. In this case, there is no overlapping edit history, so you're good to proceed.
• If you're here, you can use spihelper's case merge! Go to the case that needs to be merged, open up spihelper, under the date dropdown click "All Sections," then check "Move/merge full case (Clerk only)". You'll be prompted for the name of the correct sockmaster, have to acknowledge that you want to perform a histmerge, and then spihelper will take care of the merge for you (since the target is older than the current page, you can't use Special:MergeHistory, you have to do the old-fashioned delete + copy + undelete).
• If the case you were merging had an archive, check the new case's archive and reorder as necessary; not needed in this case.
• Retag socks as needed.

I know this sounds complicated, but once you've done it a couple times it's pretty painless. If you do run into any issues, ping me and I can help you sort them out. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

GeneralNotability, thanks - I think I've done that right, appreciate the steer, that was fairly straightforward, good old spihelper :). If you come across a case that requires a more complicated histmerge at any point, I'd appreciate the chance to watch you work on it so I can get a handle on what needs to be done. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 07:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Greetings. I saw that you blocked user:Pealnotch, and part of the reason was "yet another member of the Camella spam group, possibly also block-evading". An article they created was moved to draft by MER-C as a UPE concern. That article, Lessandra, was moved back to mainspace by another new user, user:DaveSkylar. The article was also worked on by another blocked editor, user:Theniftymom2021, as well as by another new editor, user:Repaypolk. My question is, is the appropriate venue to report something like this SPI? Or is there a better way to go about it? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Onel5969, that's a good question. I don't think we have a proper SPI for this group, but it would not have been wrong to file it at SPI. Posting to my talk page works too :). Repaypolk has my attention, but behavior is inconsistent with the rest of this farm. Blocked DaveSkylar, moved Lessandra back to draft, ECP move-protected it for good measure. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Will also keep my eye on Repaypolk. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Hey. Could you possibly check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arturo Ungaro? I opened the case about five days ago and the user has continued their vandalism spree. A large part of the vandalism are several intentionally incorrect page moves that need to be reverted (preferably without leaving a redirect back). If you don't the time for latter, I can handle parts of it, though I cannot always G6-deleted. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 14:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

IceWelder, handled the SPI, working on reverting the page moves. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi! Would you care to take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ichika Kasuga#15 April 2021, seeing as you're familiar with the case? TompaDompa (talk) 08:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

TompaDompa, handled. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! TompaDompa (talk) 08:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Montgomery's doctrine and Nick-D on Mussolini's wars

Can you delete the template/script created page at User:Tataqp? The sock issue seems to have been resolved, the unblock has been granted and I don't think that userpage in that form is justified any longer? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Piotrus, done. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I grant you #4 top spot. But always Praxie is #1 best. --IHeartPraxieMost (talk) 21:16, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

I can live with that. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi. If there a way to make sure that the SPI helper script checks if there is already a global lock request at SRG before requesting a global lock? m:User:Xiplus/TwinkleGlobal does this, so is it possible? aeschyIus (talk) 13:15, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

AeschyIus, That's maintained by User:GeneralNotability. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

AeschyIus, yes, that's something I can look into. Tracking here. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

I was about to open an SPI but decided not to because I felt the suspected master sock is now “stale”. My question is, why are some SPI's declined because the master sock is stale? and if you can, how long constitutes “stale” ? Celestina007 (talk) 22:10, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Celestina007, "stale" can mean a few different things at SPI. From a technical (that is, CheckUser) perspective, an account is "stale" if it has not made any actions in 90 days (this generally can be found by seeing when their last edit or log action was, though it includes deleted edits). For IP addresses, we'll usually call them "stale" if they haven't edited in a week or so and the IP appears to move around frequently - that usually means the editor is on a different IP now and there's no point in blocking it. And in general...if none of the accounts in the SPI are blocked and the majority haven't edited in a long time, we usually won't bother with blocking them, since at that point a block would be punitive rather than preventative. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Math on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)