User talk:DanganMachin

Hello, Maxime12346, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 16:16, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 July 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 European floods, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 04:09, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 1953 de Havilland Comet crash, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Singularity42 (talk) 17:18, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Felixstowe Fury crash and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Felixstowe Fury crash, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:03, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Brussels Finance Conference of 1920, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1953 de Havilland Comet crash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1953 de Havilland Comet crash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of battles by geographic location, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rus'–Byzantine War. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of battles by geographic location, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franco-Spanish War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Felixstowe Fury crash, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brussels Finance Conference of 1920, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Felixstowe Fury crash".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I just wanted to let you know that an alternate version of Draft:LHS 475 b exists now at LHS 475 b, so you shouldn't feel the need to continue working on that draft. :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 02:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up ! Maxime12346 (talk) 19:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Brussels Finance Conference of 1920".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to François De Smet. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Probably notable per WP:NPOL based on that legislature seat, but has to be properly supported with reliable sources, and the layout and structure needs a complete overhaul to comply with MOS. Please see WP:YFA and WP:REFB for advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:François De Smet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:François De Smet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maxime12346. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "François De Smet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fusajiro Yamauchi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fusajiro Yamauchi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. NatwonTSG2 (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering, where did you get access to the L'Historie de Nintendo, used on Fusajiro Yamauchi? — VORTEX³⁴²⁷ (Talk!) 00:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a book I bought, you can find it there : https://omakebooks.com/fr/l-histoire-de-nintendo/274-l-histoire-de-nintendo-vol1.html

But it also exists in english, althought I couldn't find it sold by the official editors. DanganMachin (talk) 10:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DanganMachin: I've noticed that the review of your article Fusajiro Yamauchi was not done fully in accordance with the GA review instructions; therefore, I've reopened the review and unfortunately delisted the article (for now). In particular, there are some sources and photos that went unchecked (though upon a cursory glance, they mostly look okay), and the prose needs to be heavily refined.

Apologies for the inconvenience, and I hope that you are able to eventually get this back to GA quality. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. joeyquism (talk page) 02:53, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does that mean NatwonTSG2 is still responsible for reviewing my nomination ? Have you contacted them too ? DanganMachin (talk) 11:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Natwon will still be responsible for the review. I’ve contacted them about this already. joeyquism (talk page) 15:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I have noticed that there is still "0 reviews, 1 GA" on the good articles nominations page next to my username, is that normal ? Shouldn't the 1 GA be removed since the article I promoted was delisted ? DanganMachin (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It'll be updated soon; the bot tends to take a while with this. joeyquism (talk page) 18:09, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @DanganMachin. I saw on your userpage that you are trying to get a WP:WAWARD. The W Award system is inactive at this moment as no one has been getting any awards for several years. It could be a personal award that you give yourself but the actual W Award process is inactive. Thank you, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 03:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the head up, I am still going to try to go for it for personal gratification, and who knows it might become active again one day ? (: DanganMachin (talk) 09:07, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. I do plan on asking the old director, TonyTheTiger, if it would be alright for me to take over. Haven’t tried it yet though. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 17:46, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]