User talk:Dudo2

Regarding the Pachyrhinosaurus skull, the copyright info I got from the page says, among other things (and it's all on the Wikipage): "The photographs may be used for any non-commercial, non-profit use without prior permission." I thought that qualified for Wikipedia, but if it doesn't, I will be glad to delete it. I'm a little new to adding photos.

I am less sure about the Byronosaurus, but it does say: "The images may be used for the personal education of website visitors." and so I was hoping that worked too. Sorry if I made a mistake!

Devotchka 16:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(As you mentioned on my talk page). You're absolutely right about commons:Image:Allosaurus2.jpg it is a Ceratosaurus! I did not read the article where I found it too carefully! I have already used it in Wikijunior_Dinosaurs/Allosaurus and will revert the change.

But from the other sources that I have seen, this looks to me like a more accurate picture of the Ceratosaurus than the one currently present on the Ceratosaurus page. Maybe it should replace the image. But you seem to have more knowledge about dinosaurs, so I'll leave it up to you. (The source link was: http://www.lindahall.org/events_exhib/exhibit/exhibits/dino/gil1920.htm) --Konstable 08:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia & to Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs! I hope you have an excellent time on the project. If you need help with anything, don't hesitate to ask me at all. Right now, the project is trying to create an article for every single dinosaur on the List of dinosaurs list. Have a good day, Spawn Man 23:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]

I've successfully created an open list of tasks on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs main page for those who would actually like to know what to do with their time on the project. Add tasks as you wish, no too long though! Add your name to tasks you wish to be part of & that's as complicated as it gets... Thanks, Spawn Man 23:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No we cannot use any of the images off the site you posted on my talk page. Unfortunately, without permission from the site or creator, we cannot upload them. If you do, they will probably be deleted. Sorry, Spawn Man 07:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasnt being personal with you. The violation of NPOV probally wasnt on purpose, but things suchs as 'beautifull', 'amazing', etc etc violate WP:NPOV. Sadly i was in a bad, and ADHD, mood, so i just reverted the lot of it. If you wish to revert me, please do so, but please follow WP:NPOV and rewrite most of what is there. Ley Shade 17:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dudo!

There's currently less than 100 dinosaurs left on the Missing dinosaur page. We've come a long way! I was thinking that since there's just under 100 dinosaurs left, and since there are 25 of us signed on for the project, if we each wrote about four articles, we'd be done! Well, not "done", obviously, as many of the articles are in need of expansion. But then we could focus on expansion and other things.

You could take, say, Marshosaurus, Mendozasaurus, Microhadrosaurus, and Mongolosaurus.

It's just an idea, of course, and you're of course not obligated and can do whatever you like; I just figured I'd mention the idea, and see if you were interested. No harm, right?

Take care, --Firsfron 06:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, yup - done :) --Dudo2 13:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that was fast, Dudo. Great job. We can add more to these, but you have created some nice stubs. Thank you! :)--Firsfron 17:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Youre welcome :) And thank you for correcting my english mistakes, english is not my mother tongue, but though, I try to do my best. I dont know if its essential to concentrate on these four dinos, since they seem to me a bit unimportant in the sence they are whether dubious or little known. Instead, later on, Im planning to spend some time on adding info or re-writting some non-theropod articles (mostly Ornithischian), since I think a stub on my beloved Lurdusaurus is not enough :) Thus my little slovak "mother wiki" has to wait a while. --Dudo2 20:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Your English is pretty accurate. Thanks for the fixes on my Noasaurus article. The edits look good. If you visit the List of dinosaurs page, and start clicking, you'll find many articles in great need of expansion, and I know you said earlier that you wanted to concentrate on dinosaur articles mostly in your native Slovak tongue, but you're still more than welcome to add to any article. Thanks for participating in the doing-four-articles collaboration, and good luck with Lurdusaurus! --Firsfron 21:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Please accept this invite to join the new WikiProject Bodybuilding, a WikiProject dedicated to improving bodybuilding related articles. Simply click here to accept! Addbot (talk) 02:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help - I've now changed the name of the article to Chirotherium, with a 'redirect' from Cheirotherium. - Ballista 06:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edit - great stuff - Ballista 04:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) --Dudo2 11:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for joining! Firstly, please add {{WikiProject Bodybuilding}}, {{User WikiProject Bodybuilding}} or simply [[Category:WikiProject Bodybuilding Members]] to your user page which adds a banner, userbox or simply our member's category. Then please take a look here to see how you can help! Please contact me if I can assist in anyway, and thanks again! - Glen 09:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but you have to add it. Have you read the discussion page? There have been attempts to delete the page and an agreement was reached that new ppl need sources adding with the name.Halbared 13:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dudo!

I'm planning to send Stegosaurus to Featured Article candidacy. The article failed its first nomination, but user:Casliber and I have been hard at work fixing stuff. As you're listed as a member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Dinosaurs, I figured I'd drop you a line and see if there was anything you thought should be added/removed/cited on the article before it is sent to FAC. We definitely want it to pass! :)

(Feel free to make any edits on the article itself, comment on the talk page, or leave a note on my talk page). Thanks for your time, Firsfron of Ronchester 19:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have recently created a template which can be used on their user pages by those, who contribute to the Slovak Wikipedia as well. If you are interested, you can have a look at Template:User wikisk. Jan.Kamenicek 22:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Slovakia, an attempt to build and maintain a large and neutral database of Slovakia-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the members section of WikiProject Slovakia.

≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 08:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dudo2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dudo2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dudo2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, absent user, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]