User talk:CyberTheTiger

I have some constructive feedback to offer on your addition to Wisconsin Highway 78.

1. Most importantly, we write route description sections south-to-north or west-to-east to follow the direction of the mileposts. This entire section was written north-to-south, so it needs to be flipped around.
2. Per MOS:HEAD, the section headings are rendered in sentence case on Wikipedia, meaning "Route description" and never "Route Description".
3. The first time that a highway of a specific type is mentioned, it should have its designation spelled out in full followed by the abbreviation in parentheses. Afterwards, any additional highways of that type can be abbreviated on first mention.
4. We provide conversions for measurements. You can use {{convert}} to simplify this.
5. When linking to local communities, most of those articles would include ", Wisconsin" the name. Leaving it out links to a disambiguation page in many cases. You can pipe the link to customize the display: [[Merrimac, Wisconsin|Merrimac]] will link to "Merrimac, Wisconsin" but display as "Merrimac".
   1. The same concepts work on highway links. We should link to the specific state-detail article on US Highways instead of relying on the redirect from US 14 to the national-level U.S. Route 14.
6. Last, but not least, we need to cite our sources for our content. What maps or other sources did you use to write this? I can help you to insert proper footnotes to the sources you used, but we need to know what they are to start.

Imzadi 1979 → 23:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The introduction paragraph was written in reverse. Also I want to source Google Maps. CyberTheTiger (talk) 15:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That whole section is written in the wrong order. It needs to be reversed so that the description starts at the Illinois state line and progresses northward. Until then, the tag in that section needs to remain. Imzadi 1979 → 16:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Route 51 in Wisconsin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock River and Expressway. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manson Lake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 00:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, CyberTheTiger! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 00:56, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Village on Park Street and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wingra Creek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin Lake (Wisconsin), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 07:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Musicians with Masks (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CyberTheTiger. Thank you for your work on Three Women at the Spring. Another editor, Kentuckian, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article. I would suggest fixing the concerns that have been raised. Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kentuckian}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Kentuckian |💬   03:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect NOT:DICTIONARY has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 13 § NOT:DICTIONARY until a consensus is reached. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 01:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page U.S. Route 12 in Wisconsin, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Chicago and North Western Railroad municipalities has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand. Why are you saying it’s not called a ship in the Bible? Doug Weller talk 20:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In no place in the Bible does it refer to Noah's big boat as a "ship". Cyber the tiger (talk) 22:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's just not true.[1]. We can only rely on translations. Doug Weller talk 10:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Chicago, St. Paul and Fond du Lac Railroad. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:07, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Memorial Union (University of Wisconsin-Madison), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madison Area Technical College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madison Central High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyberTheTiger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Covenant Point Bible Camp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Musicians with Masks (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If such a redlink exists I made it redirect to Three Musicians (Picasso) as Musicians with Masks already redirects there Cyber the tiger (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Covenant Point Bible Camp. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 06:56, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Lake Ottawa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 07:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lake Ottawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyberTheTiger! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 01:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those were all correct beforehand and should not have been changed to dashes. If you can read a construction and substitute the word "to" in place of the dash, then it's correct. "I-39" can't be read as "I to 39", but "east–west" can be read as "east to west", thus the former is a hyphen and the latter is a dash. There are a few exceptions to that general rule, but those didn't apply in the article. Compound adjectives like "two-lane" always use a hyphen, and so do compound words like "re-route", which can also be "reroute". I switched them all back. Imzadi 1979 → 22:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plants vs. Zombies (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plants vs. Zombies (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuantumFoam66 (talk) 00:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Plants vs. Zombies (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Per WP:AVALANCHE. All contributors in AFD unanimously vote delete.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheWikiToby (talk) 02:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CyberTheTiger,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Taylor Swidt for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Taylor Swidt to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cities formerly served by Chicago and North Western has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 14:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dog poop (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog poop (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walsh90210 (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyberTheTiger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mount Zion Baptist Church (Madison, Wisconsin), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect MOSHEAD has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27 § MOSHEAD until a consensus is reached. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Burglar (disabmiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 29 § Burglar (disabmiguation) until a consensus is reached. Killarnee (talk) 06:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Grabage truck has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 29 § Grabage truck until a consensus is reached. Killarnee (talk) 06:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Eva Gouel, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wingra Creek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wingra Creek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:01, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CyberTheTiger. Thank you for your work on Westgate Mall (Madison). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. Needs more sources and content. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Tsylor Swift has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5 § Tsylor Swift until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Mileu Cyrus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5 § Mileu Cyrus until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:27, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Template:Please stop move has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 9 § Template:Please stop move until a consensus is reached. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CyberTheTiger,

Please stop creating random redirects as many of them have been nominated for deletion consideration at WP:RFD. You are encouraged to participate in these discussions where you can explain your decisions to create these redirects and why you think they are appropriate. But for now, please stop creating them at all as the message that you are receiving is that many of them are unsuitable for this project.

I also invite you to visit the Teahouse where you can bring any questions you have about our deletion processes or about redirect creation. There are experienced editors ready to answer your questions and provide advice and support. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CyberTheTiger, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Goodman Pool, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goodman Pool.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 03:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CyberTheTiger! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Deletion tag, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CyberTheTiger! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Sockpuppet, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CyberTheTiger! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Why is editing other users' talk page comments inappropiate?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toyota Sienna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Center console.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your bold move of Big-game hunting has been reverted because an editor has found it to be controversial. Per Wikipedia:Requested moves, a move request must be placed on the article's talk page, and the request be open for discussion for seven days, "if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested". If you believe that this move is appropriate, please initiate such a discussion to form the appropriate consensus. Again, please note that moving a page with a longstanding title and/or a large number of incoming links is more likely to be considered controversial, and may be contested. Note that such consensus is particularly required before moving a title with incoming links in order to create a disambiguation page at that title. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]